Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Top 10 Papers in 2020
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • Call for Abstracts 2021
    • 2020 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Top 10 Papers in 2020
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • Call for Abstracts 2021
    • 2020 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Follow aarc on Twitter
  • Visit aarc on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Contributions

The Ear as an Alternative Site for a Pulse Oximeter Finger Clip Sensor

Jeffrey M Haynes
Respiratory Care June 2007, 52 (6) 727-729;
Jeffrey M Haynes
Department of Respiratory Therapy, St Joseph Hospital, Nashua, New Hampshire.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Finger clip pulse oximetry sensors are commonly used to obtain functional oxygen saturation readings (SpO2), but these sensors may perform poorly if the digit is poorly perfused or there is excessive hand movement. I have increasingly witnessed clinicians obtaining SpO2 readings by placing the finger clip sensor on the patient's ear when an SpO2 reading cannot be obtained from a finger.

OBJECTIVE: Determine if reliable SpO2 readings can be obtained from a finger clip sensor placed on the ear.

METHODS: This was a prospective study with patients undergoing pulmonary function testing. The calculated functional oxygen saturation values from arterial blood gas analysis (SaO2) were compared with SpO2 readings from a finger clip sensor placed on a finger (finger SpO2) and on the upper portion of an ear (ear SpO2). SpO2 data were included in the study only if (1) the pulse rate from finger SpO2 and ear SpO2 differed by ≤ 5 beats/min and (2) the photoplethysmographic waveform was stable and acceptable.

RESULTS: Data were obtained from 30 adult white patients. The number of SpO2 readings that differed from the SaO2 values by ≥ 3% were 1 (3.3%) finger SpO2 reading and 24 (80%, 95% CI 61%–92%) ear SpO2 readings (p < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis showed better agreement between SaO2 and finger SpO2 (mean ± 2 SD limits of agreement −2.35 to 2.35) than between SaO2 and ear SpO2 (limits of agreement −7.24 to −0.08) or finger SpO2 and ear SpO2 (limits of agreement −7.56 to −0.23).

CONCLUSION: A pulse oximeter finger clip sensor placed on the ear does not provide clinically reliable SpO2 readings.

  • pulse oximetry
  • blood gas analysis
  • oxygenation
  • monitoring

Footnotes

  • Correspondence: Jeffrey M Haynes RRT RPFT, Department of Respiratory Therapy, St Joseph Hospital, 172 Kinsley Street, Nashua NH 03060. E-mail: jhaynes{at}sjh-nh.org.
  • Copyright © 2007 by Daedalus Enterprises Inc.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 52 (6)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 52, Issue 6
1 Jun 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Ear as an Alternative Site for a Pulse Oximeter Finger Clip Sensor
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Ear as an Alternative Site for a Pulse Oximeter Finger Clip Sensor
Jeffrey M Haynes
Respiratory Care Jun 2007, 52 (6) 727-729;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
The Ear as an Alternative Site for a Pulse Oximeter Finger Clip Sensor
Jeffrey M Haynes
Respiratory Care Jun 2007, 52 (6) 727-729;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Keywords

  • pulse oximetry
  • blood gas analysis
  • oxygenation
  • monitoring

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Reprints/Permissions

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire