Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Top 10 Papers in 2020
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • Call for Abstracts 2021
    • 2020 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Top 10 Papers in 2020
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • Call for Abstracts 2021
    • 2020 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Follow aarc on Twitter
  • Visit aarc on Facebook
EditorialEditorials

Oxygen: The Kiss of Life

Stefano Nava
Respiratory Care December 2011, 56 (12) 1975-1976; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.01586
Stefano Nava
Pneumologia e Terapia Intensiva Respiratoria Policlinico Sant Orsola-Malpighi Bologna, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

I am the very air you breathe Your first and last breath

—Roger McGough1

Recent guidelines emphasize the importance of an active life for COPD patients, including those with chronic respiratory failure.2 Oxygen supplementation increases exercise performances and prevents oxygen desaturation during daily activities in patients with “overt” or “latent” chronic respiratory failure.3 This highlights the importance of correctly titrating home oxygen flow for when these patients are at home and/or performing an outdoor activity.

The prescription of long-term oxygen therapy and the titration of the flow rate are based either on resting PaO2 or exertional desaturation, usually assessed during the 6-min walk test, which does not necessarily mimic real-life situations.4 Several conditions may require different oxygen flows,5 and some of them are “involuntary” or “mandatory,” such as sleeping, defecating,6 eating, and digestion, whereas some others are “voluntary,” such as walking, gardening, cooking, traveling, sex, and even watching television. If, during these activities, oxygen desaturations are not adequately corrected, they may result in cardiac arrhythmia and eventually transient pulmonary hypertension that may harm the patient's life.

In this issue of the Journal, Rice et al7 report an elegant randomized trial of a new portable closed-loop oximetry-driven, oxygen-conserving device, the AccuO2, which they compared to standard continuous-flow oxygen and to another oxygen-conserving device (CR-50). They tested the 3 oxygen systems' ability to maintain SpO2 at 90%, and compared the systems' oxygen consumption/conservation. Their findings confirm data from a randomized controlled trial8 of a device that automatically adjusts the oxygen flow based on SpO2 measurements during a constant-work-load test, compared to manual titration by a respiratory therapist.

The merits of the study by Rice et al7 are numerous, including their rigorous methods, the use of 2 controls (ie, continuous flow and CR-50), and the real-life testing with patients, not confined to a laboratory setting, as was the investigation by Cirio and Nava.8 By keeping the SpO2 very constant, at a “desirable” value, the AccuO2 may be useful in patients with preexisting hypercapnia, in whom increasing PaO2 above a certain limit causes deleterious changes to alveolar ventilation and gas exchange, thus worsening acidosis.9

The AccuO2 had better oxygen conservation than the CR-50. This is very likely to be associated with a cost saving, which may be considered rather small in absolute terms per patient, but from a larger perspective may result in a quite impressive cost reduction. For example, Rice et al point out that 24 million Americans are affected by COPD, but in other parts of the world the COPD population is much larger: for example, in China it is estimated to be about 110 million.

There are, however, some potential unanswered questions that this investigation7 still leaves open. The first is that the patients were using the oxygen devices for 8 hours during the daytime, so their effectiveness in maintaining the target SpO2 during sleep was not assessed, and in COPD patients' sleep is often associated with more severe hypoxemia and hypercapnia, which in some patients induces substantial cardiovascular effects.10

Second, the 3 oxygen-delivery devices were tested on different days, and the patients' activity levels were measured with an actigraph, which calculates the activity levels as counts and therefore does not consider the actual energy expenditure and activity intensity levels, which are the leading causes of hypoxia.

Third, the AccuO2 provides a maximum flow of only 4 L/min, which is insufficient to guarantee a satisfactory SpO2 in patients with more severe COPD, especially during exercise.

In keeping with the concept that a sedentary life is not recommended in COPD patients, also in this issue of the Journal, Díaz Lobato and co-workers11 present an interesting case report of a patient with overlap syndrome (obesity hypoventilation syndrome plus COPD) who (not on a physician's advice) was simultaneously using night-time noninvasive ventilation (NIV) and supplemental oxygen. The patient also travelled for several days per month. For simplicity he had recently changed from a stationary oxygen concentrator to a portable pulse-dose concentrator, but he reported that during NIV the “no oxygen delivery” alarm was always on. Díaz Lobato et al tested the patient's combined oxygen and NIV system and found that the concentrator did not detect the patient's inspiratory effort (and therefore did not deliver oxygen) at any of the tested settings. This was probably due to the interference of the inspiratory and expiratory pressures with the concentrator's triggering system.

This case report11 is important because it highlights the lack of interaction and exchange between clinicians and manufacturers, which is essential to understand the daily needs of our patients. It is clear to me that the company that developed the portable concentrator was not aware that it might be used during mechanical ventilation, especially in this era where chronic respiratory patients are no longer home-bound. Indeed, the report by Díaz Lobato et al11 focuses our attention on the problem of adding low-flow oxygen during NIV, in ventilators that do not have oxygen blenders. In that setting, supplemental oxygen is often added to the ventilator circuit to maintain an adequate SpO2, but the FIO2 is generally unknown, and is influenced by several factors such as the applied pressures, the oxygen flow, and the site where oxygen is added to the circuit. To my knowledge there has been only one study12 on this issue, and it found that oxygen should be added close to the exhaust port (ventilator side) of the circuit. If the inspiratory pressure is > 12 cm H2O, the oxygen flow should be at least 4 L/min. The lack of studies on supplemental oxygen during NIV in home ventilators is rather surprising. While most of the ventilator manufacturers have focused their attention on the ventilation algorithms, new ventilation modes, ease of use, and connectivity, they apparently forget to deal with one of the most important issues, which is the best technological solution to provide adequate oxygenation to the body tissues. Oxygen is the kiss of life and we badly need to understand how this kiss should be given.

Footnotes

  • Correspondence: Stefano Nava MD, Pneumologia e Terapia Intensiva Respiratoria, Policlinico Sant Orsola-Malpighi, via Massarenti no. 9, Bologna 40138 Italy. E-mail: stefano.nava{at}aosp.bo.it.
  • The author has disclosed no conflicts of interest.

  • See the Original Study on Page 1901 and the Case Report on Page 1950

  • Copyright © 2011 by Daedalus Enterprises Inc.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. McGough R
    . Oxygen. In: Collected poems. London: Penguin Books; 2004.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Ries AL,
    2. Bauldoff GS,
    3. Carlin BW,
    4. Casaburi R,
    5. Emery CF,
    6. Mahler DA,
    7. et al
    . Pulmonary rehabilitation. Joint ACCP/AACVPR evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2007;13(Suppl 5):4S–42S.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Emtner M,
    2. Porszasz J,
    3. Burns M,
    4. Somfay A,
    5. Casaburi R
    . Benefits of supplemental oxygen in exercise training in nonhypoxemic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;168(9):1034–1042.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Nici L,
    2. Donner C,
    3. Wouters E,
    4. Zuwallack R,
    5. Ambrosino N,
    6. Bourbeau J,
    7. et al
    . American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement on pulmonary rehabilitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006;173(12):1390–1413.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Soguel Schenkel N,
    2. Muralt BB,
    3. Fitting JW
    . Oxygen saturation during daily activities in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur Respir J 1996;9(12):2584–2589.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  6. 6.↵
    1. Delmastro M,
    2. Santoro C,
    3. Nava S
    . Respiratory changes during defecation in patients with chronic respiratory failure. Eur Respir J 2004;23(4):617–619.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Rice KL,
    2. Schmidt MF,
    3. Buan JS,
    4. Lebahn F,
    5. Schwarzock TK
    . AccuO2 oximetry-driven oxygen-conserving device versus fixed-dose oxygen devices in stable COPD patients. Respir Care 2011;56(12):1901–1905.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Cirio S,
    2. Nava S
    . Pilot study of a new device to titrate oxygen flow in hypoxic patients on long-term oxygen therapy. Respir Care 2011;56(4):429–434.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Plant PK,
    2. Owen JL,
    3. Elliot MW
    . One year period prevalence study of respiratory acidosis in acute exacerbation of COPD: implications for the provision of non-invasive ventilation and oxygen administration. Thorax 2000;55(7):550–554.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Flick MR,
    2. Block AJ
    . Nocturnal vs diurnal cardiac arrhythmias in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chest 1979;75(5):8–11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Díaz Lobato S,
    2. Pérez Rodríguez E,
    3. Mayoralas Alises S
    , Portable pulse-dose oxygen concentrators should not be used with noninvasive ventilation. Respir Care 2011;56(12):1950–1952.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Thys F,
    2. Liistro G,
    3. Dozin O,
    4. Marion E,
    5. Rodenstein DO
    . Determinants of FIO2 with oxygen supplementation during noninvasive two-level positive pressure ventilation. Eur Respir J 2002;19(4):653–657.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 56 (12)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 56, Issue 12
1 Dec 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Oxygen: The Kiss of Life
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Oxygen: The Kiss of Life
Stefano Nava
Respiratory Care Dec 2011, 56 (12) 1975-1976; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.01586

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Oxygen: The Kiss of Life
Stefano Nava
Respiratory Care Dec 2011, 56 (12) 1975-1976; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.01586
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Reprints/Permissions

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire