Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Top 10 Papers in 2020
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • Call for Abstracts 2021
    • 2020 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Top 10 Papers in 2020
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • Call for Abstracts 2021
    • 2020 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Follow aarc on Twitter
  • Visit aarc on Facebook
Research ArticleSpecial Article

Developing a New, National Approach to Surveillance for Ventilator-Associated Events: Executive Summary

Shelley S Magill, Michael Klompas, Robert Balk, Suzanne M Burns, Clifford S Deutschman, Daniel Diekema, Scott Fridkin, Linda Greene, Alice Guh, David Gutterman, Beth Hammer, David Henderson, Dean R Hess, Nicholas S Hill, Teresa Horan, Marin Kollef, Mitchell Levy, Edward Septimus, Carole VanAntwerpen, Don Wright and Pamela Lipsett
Respiratory Care November 2013, 58 (11) 1985-1989; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.02759
Shelley S Magill
1. Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Michael Klompas
2. Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA.
3. Infection Control Department, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
4. Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America, Arlington, VA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert Balk
5. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Rush University School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
6. Critical Care Societies Collaborative—American Association of Critical-Care Nurses, American College of Chest Physicians, American Thoracic Society, Society of Critical Care Medicine.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Suzanne M Burns
6. Critical Care Societies Collaborative—American Association of Critical-Care Nurses, American College of Chest Physicians, American Thoracic Society, Society of Critical Care Medicine.
7. School of Nursing, Critical and Acute Care, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Clifford S Deutschman
6. Critical Care Societies Collaborative—American Association of Critical-Care Nurses, American College of Chest Physicians, American Thoracic Society, Society of Critical Care Medicine.
8. Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel Diekema
9. Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA.
10. Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee Surveillance Working Group, Atlanta, GA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott Fridkin
1. Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Linda Greene
11. Infection Prevention and Control Department, Rochester General Health System, Rochester, NY.
12. Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Washington, DC.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alice Guh
1. Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Gutterman
6. Critical Care Societies Collaborative—American Association of Critical-Care Nurses, American College of Chest Physicians, American Thoracic Society, Society of Critical Care Medicine.
13. Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Beth Hammer
6. Critical Care Societies Collaborative—American Association of Critical-Care Nurses, American College of Chest Physicians, American Thoracic Society, Society of Critical Care Medicine.
14. Department of Cardiology, Zablocki VA Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Henderson
15. Hospital Epidemiology and Quality Improvement, The Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dean R Hess
16. Department of Respiratory Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
17. Department of Anesthesia, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
18. American Association for Respiratory Care, Irving, TX.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicholas S Hill
6. Critical Care Societies Collaborative—American Association of Critical-Care Nurses, American College of Chest Physicians, American Thoracic Society, Society of Critical Care Medicine.
19. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Teresa Horan
1. Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marin Kollef
6. Critical Care Societies Collaborative—American Association of Critical-Care Nurses, American College of Chest Physicians, American Thoracic Society, Society of Critical Care Medicine.
20. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mitchell Levy
6. Critical Care Societies Collaborative—American Association of Critical-Care Nurses, American College of Chest Physicians, American Thoracic Society, Society of Critical Care Medicine.
21. Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep, Warren Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edward Septimus
22. Department of Internal Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center, College Station, TX.
23. Infectious Diseases Society of America, Arlington, VA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carole VanAntwerpen
24. New York State Department of Health, Bureau of Healthcare-Associated Infections, Albany, NY.
25. Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, Atlanta, GA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Don Wright
26. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pamela Lipsett
6. Critical Care Societies Collaborative—American Association of Critical-Care Nurses, American College of Chest Physicians, American Thoracic Society, Society of Critical Care Medicine.
27. Department of Surgery, Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • ventilator-associated pneumonia
  • ICU
  • epidemiology
  • public health
  • critical care
  • mechanicalventilation

In September 2011, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) convened a Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) Surveillance Definition Working Group to organize a formal process for leaders and experts of key stakeholder organizations to discuss the challenges of VAP surveillance definitions and to propose new approaches to VAP surveillance in adult patients (Table). The charges to the Working Group were to:

  1. Critically review a draft, streamlined VAP surveillance definition developed for use in adult patients;

  2. Suggest modifications to enhance the reliability and credibility of the surveillance definition within the critical care and infection prevention communities;

  3. Propose a final adult surveillance definition algorithm, to be implemented in the CDC's National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN), taking into consideration the potential future use of the definition algorithm in public reporting, interfacility comparisons, and pay-for-reporting and pay-for-performance programs.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table.

VAP Surveillance Definition Working Group Organizations, Representatives, and Federal Participants

The Working Group's surveillance definition algorithm, which is referred to as the ventilator-associated events or VAE surveillance definition algorithm, represents a purposeful departure from VAP toward more general, objective measures of conditions and complications occurring in patients on mechanical ventilation (Figure; VAE surveillance protocol available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/acute-care-hospital/vae/index.html). The VAE surveillance definition algorithm uses a tiered approach, moving from measures of ventilator-associated conditions (VAC), to infection-related ventilator-associated complications (IVAC), to possible and probable VAP.

Figure.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure.

Ventilator-associated events surveillance definition algorithm. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/acute-care-hospital/vae/index.html. PEEP = positive end-expiratory pressure. FIO2 = fraction of inspired oxygen. VAP = ventilator-associated pneumonia. CFU = colony-forming unit.

The first tier of VAE surveillance, VAC, seeks to identify episodes of sustained respiratory deterioration, and will capture both infectious and non-infectious conditions and complications occurring in mechanically ventilated patients. VAC is defined by a sustained period of worsening oxygenation that immediately follows a baseline period of stability or improvement on the ventilator. To meet the VAC definition, a mechanically ventilated patient must have at least 2 calendar days of stable or decreasing daily minimum positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) or fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2), followed by at least 2 days of increased daily minimum PEEP or FIO2, where the increase in the daily minimum PEEP is ≥ 3 cm H2O greater than the daily minimum PEEP during the baseline period, or where the increase in the daily minimum FIO2 is ≥ 0.20 (or 20 percentage points in oxygen concentration) greater than the daily minimum FIO2 during the baseline period. For example, if a patient's daily minimum FIO2 requirement on days 4 and 5 of mechanical ventilation is 0.40, then the patient's daily minimum FIO2 requirement would need to be at least 0.60 on days 6 and 7 of mechanical ventilation for the VAC definition to be met. The Working Group's decisions to set specific thresholds of 3 cm H2O and 0.20 (20 points) for the increases in PEEP and FIO2, respectively, and to define a “sustained” increase as an increase persisting for at least 2 calendar days, were based on expert opinion of what criteria would likely identify clinically important events, while minimizing inadvertent inclusion of other types of events resulting in transient changes in oxygenation—such as surgery or performance of other procedures. Thresholds were also selected based upon published data indicating that increases of ≥ 2.5 cm H2O in PEEP or ≥ 0.15 (15 points) in FIO2 sustained for at least 2 days were associated with longer duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU and hospital stays, and increased mortality.1 Subsequently, additional data have been published that support the Working Group's approach to VAC.2

The second tier, IVAC, attempts to identify the subset of VACs that are potentially related to infection, as evidenced by an abnormal white blood cell count or temperature and initiation of a new antimicrobial agent. IVAC will likely capture patients with pulmonary infections and extrapulmonary infections of sufficient severity to trigger respiratory deterioration. The Working Group recognized the low predictive value of an abnormal temperature or white blood cell count in ICU patients, and Klompas and colleagues have shown that the addition of fever or abnormal white blood cell count to VAC definition does not substantially enhance the definition's predictive value for death.2 Nevertheless, these are objective and readily available signs that are frequently used at the bedside to assess for the presence of infection. The additional required criterion of starting a new antimicrobial, where the new agent is continued for at least 4 days, may add specificity and clinical credibility to the IVAC definition, although data are needed.

The third tier, possible and probable VAP, attempts to zero in on the subset of IVAC patients with respiratory infections as manifested by objective evidence of purulent respiratory secretions (where purulence is defined using quantitative or semiquantitative criteria for the number of neutrophils on Gram-stain) and/or positive results of microbiological tests performed on respiratory tract specimens. The possible VAP definition is met with the presence of purulent secretions or a positive lower respiratory tract culture (showing any growth); the probable VAP definition requires purulent secretions in addition to a positive lower respiratory tract culture meeting certain quantitative or semiquantitative thresholds of pathogen growth. Organisms that are uncommonly regarded as true VAP pathogens are excluded from possible and probable VAP culture criteria (with the exception of lung tissue cultures): Candida spp., coagulase-negative staphylococci, and Enterococcus spp. The probable VAP definition can also be met based upon the presence of a positive pleural fluid culture, lung tissue with histopathological evidence of infection, or positive diagnostic tests for Legionella or selected respiratory tract viruses, without the concomitant requirement for purulent secretions. Although data have shown that requiring purulent secretions or positive cultures in patients who have met a VAC definition actually diminishes the association between mortality and VAC,2 the Working Group felt that it was important to provide definitions within the VAE algorithm that more closely resemble VAP diagnostic criteria used at the bedside.

This tiered approach is believed to be the most appropriate approach in the current environment. It acknowledges limitations in the ability to accurately identify VAP for surveillance purposes—simply labeling an event “VAP” does not make it so—and focuses instead on a more general measure of complications of mechanical ventilation. This approach may also reduce the likelihood of definition gaming or manipulation that could artificially lower event rates.

Two features of the VAE surveillance definition algorithm are of particular note. First, radiographic evidence of pneumonia is not included as a criterion in any tier of the algorithm because of lack of specificity, and the subjectivity inherent in facilities' and individual providers' practices in ordering, performing, interpreting and reporting results of chest radiographs. Second, only VAC and IVAC (and therefore the overall VAE rate—the rate of all events meeting at least the VAC definition—and the rate of all events meeting at least the IVAC definition) are intended to be possible candidates for future use in public reporting, interfacility comparisons, and pay-for-performance programs. The VAC and IVAC definitions use criteria based on data anticipated to be available from most mechanically ventilated patients and less subject to manipulation or gaming. By contrast, the third definition tier, possible and probable VAP, was developed to be used only in internal quality improvement. These VAP definitions include criteria based on documentation of purulent secretions and/or microbiological findings and are more in keeping with traditional clinical constructs of VAP. Because of the substantial variability in the ordering and collection of lower respiratory tract specimens, and in laboratory processing of specimens and reporting of results, the Working Group determined that it was not appropriate to include these data elements in the VAC and IVAC definitions.

An iterative process for refining the definitions must be ensured as experience using the definition algorithm accumulates in the coming years. Although there was clearly a need to establish a new surveillance approach in the NHSN, there is also an urgent need to advance the science of surveillance for VAP and other VAE. The VAE surveillance definition algorithm should be studied, validated, and improved in an ongoing manner. Evaluation and refinement of the definitions should be conducted in collaboration with members of the Working Group and other members of stakeholder communities and organizations. The Working Group is already discussing potential modifications based on user feedback received during the first 3 months of VAE surveillance.

The VAP Surveillance Definition Working Group's new approach to surveillance in mechanically ventilated adults acknowledges the current limitations in VAP diagnosis and the potential benefit in focusing surveillance on an objective, reliable, but more general measure of significant conditions and complications that occur in patients on ventilators. VAE surveillance was implemented by the CDC's NHSN in January 2013. While much work remains, we believe this innovative approach to surveillance has significant potential to increase the validity of comparisons among healthcare facilities and, more importantly, to improve measurement and patient safety in the ICU.

Footnotes

  • Correspondence: Shelley S Magill MD PhD, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, MS A-24, Atlanta GA 30329. Email: smagill{at}cdc.gov.
  • Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the American Association for Respiratory Care, the Association of Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, or the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

  • This article is an executive summary of a report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Surveillance Definition Working Group published in Critical Care Medicine (Magill SS, Klompas M, Balk R, Burns SM, Deutschman CS, Diekema D, et al. Developing a new, national approach to surveillance for ventilator-associated events. Crit Care Med 2013;41(11):2467–2475). The full report provides a comprehensive description of the Working Group process and outcome.

  • Financial support: The work described herein was supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

  • DISCLOSURES: Dr Klompas received grant support from the CDC, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT. Dr Balk received grant support from the CDC and bioMérieux for participation in the EPIC CAP study (CDC) and the Procalcitonin in ICU antibiotic stewardship study (CDC and bioMérieux). Dr Deutschman received grant support from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences. Dr Diekema received grant support from Merck, Cerexa, bioMériuex, PurThread Technologies, and Pfizer. Dr Klompas received support for travel from the CDC, Society of Healthcare Epidemiologists of America, Association of Professionals in Infection Control, and the Duke University Infection Control Outreach Network. Dr Balk received support for travel from the CDC and Critical Care Societies Collaborative. Dr Burns received support for travel from the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN; meeting unrelated to this study). Drs Deutschman and Lipsett received support for travel from the Society of Critical Care Medicine. Ms Greene received support for travel from the Department of Health and Human Services/CDC. Ms Greene consults for INC. Dr Hess consulted for Philips Respironics, ResMed, Pari, and Breathe, and received honorarium from Covidien and Maquet. Ms Greene lectured for Premier, Advanced Sterilization Products, and APIC. Ms Burns lectured for AACN (annual national conference). Ms Greene presented speeches for Covidien and Maquet. Dr Septimus received an honorarium for a lecture. Dr Klompas received support from the Society of Healthcare Epidemiologists of America for the development of educational presentations. Ms Greene is employed by the Rochester General Hospital. Dr Lipsett has board membership with the Society of Critical Care Medicine. Dr Deutschman received a stipend for his Presidency with the Society of Critical Care Medicine. Dr Deutschman received royalties from Elsevier for the textbook, Evidence-based Practice of Critical Care Medicine. Ms Burns receives royalties from McGraw-Hill for books endorsed by AACN. Ms Greene receives royalties from Up-To-Date, Jones and Bartlett, and McGraw-Hill. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.

  • Copyright © 2013 by Daedalus Enterprises

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Klompas M,
    2. Khan Y,
    3. Kleinman K,
    4. Evans RS,
    5. Lloyd JF,
    6. Stevenson K,
    7. et al
    . Multicenter evaluation of a novel surveillance paradigm for complications of mechanical ventilation. PLoS One 2011;6:e18062.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Klompas M,
    2. Magill S,
    3. Robicsek A,
    4. Strymish JM,
    5. Kleinman K,
    6. Evans RS,
    7. et al
    . Objective definitions for ventilator-associated pneumonia. Crit Care Med 2012;40:3154-3161.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 58 (11)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 58, Issue 11
1 Nov 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Monthly Podcast
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Developing a New, National Approach to Surveillance for Ventilator-Associated Events: Executive Summary
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Developing a New, National Approach to Surveillance for Ventilator-Associated Events: Executive Summary
Shelley S Magill, Michael Klompas, Robert Balk, Suzanne M Burns, Clifford S Deutschman, Daniel Diekema, Scott Fridkin, Linda Greene, Alice Guh, David Gutterman, Beth Hammer, David Henderson, Dean R Hess, Nicholas S Hill, Teresa Horan, Marin Kollef, Mitchell Levy, Edward Septimus, Carole VanAntwerpen, Don Wright, Pamela Lipsett
Respiratory Care Nov 2013, 58 (11) 1985-1989; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.02759

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Developing a New, National Approach to Surveillance for Ventilator-Associated Events: Executive Summary
Shelley S Magill, Michael Klompas, Robert Balk, Suzanne M Burns, Clifford S Deutschman, Daniel Diekema, Scott Fridkin, Linda Greene, Alice Guh, David Gutterman, Beth Hammer, David Henderson, Dean R Hess, Nicholas S Hill, Teresa Horan, Marin Kollef, Mitchell Levy, Edward Septimus, Carole VanAntwerpen, Don Wright, Pamela Lipsett
Respiratory Care Nov 2013, 58 (11) 1985-1989; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.02759
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Keywords

  • ventilator-associated pneumonia
  • ICU
  • epidemiology
  • public health
  • critical care
  • mechanicalventilation

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Reprints/Permissions

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire