Mechanical Behaviors of Flutter VRP1, Shaker, and Acapella Devices

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   1. Macchione M,
   2. Guimarães ET,
   3. Saldiva PHN,
   4. Lorenzi-Filho G

   . Methods for studying respiratory mucus and mucus clearance. Braz J Med Biol Res 1995;28(11-12):1347-1355.

   OpenUrlPubMed
2. 2.
   1. Hess DR

   . Airway clearance: physiology, pharmacology, techniques, and practice. Respir Care 2007;52(10):1392-1396.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Voynow JA,
   2. Rubin BK

   . Mucins, mucus, and sputum. Chest 2009;135(2):505-512.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Van der Schans CP

   . Airway clearance: assessment of techniques. Paediatr Respir Rev 2002;3(2):110-114.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
5. 5.
   1. Hess DR

   . Secretion clearance techniques: absence of proof or proof of absence? Respir Care 2002;47(7):757-758.

   OpenUrlPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. McCool FD,
   2. Rosen MJ

   . Nonpharmacologic airway clearance therapies: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2006;129(1 Suppl):250S–259S.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Farbotko K,
   2. Wilson C,
   3. Watter P,
   4. MacDonald J

   . Change in physiotherapy management of children with cystic fibrosis in a large urban hospital. Physiother Theory Pract 2005;21(1):13-21.

   OpenUrlPubMed
8. 8.
   1. Chatburn RL

   . High-frequency assisted airway clearance. Respir Care 2007;52(9):1224-1235; discussion 1235-1237.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Morrison L,
   2. Agnew J

   . Oscillating devices for airway clearance in people with cystic fibrosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;(1):CD006842.
10. 10.↵
    1. Lindemann H

    . [The value of physical therapy with VRP 1-Desitin (“Flutter”).] Pneumologie 1992;46(12):626-630. Article in German.

    OpenUrlPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Lépore Neto FP,
    2. dE Lima LC,
    3. Gastaldi AC

    . Dynamic behavior of a respiratory physiotherapy device. Revista Ciência de Engenharia 2000;9(1):62-67. Article in Portuguese.

    OpenUrl
12. 12.↵
    1. Volsko TA,
    2. DiFiore J,
    3. Chatburn RL

    . Performance comparison of two oscillating positive expiratory pressure devices: Acapella versus Flutter. Respir Care 2003;48(2):124-130.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Brooks D,
    2. Newbold E,
    3. Kozar LF,
    4. Rivera M

    . The flutter device and expiratory pressures. J Cardiopulm Rehabil 2002;22(1):53-57.

    OpenUrlPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. de Lima LC,
    2. Duarte JB,
    3. Lépore Neto FP,
    4. Abe PT,
    5. Gastaldi AC

    . Mechanical evaluation of a respiratory device. Med Eng Phys 2005;27(2):181-187.

    OpenUrlPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Alves LA,
    2. Pitta F,
    3. Brunetto AF

    . Performance analysis of the flutter VRP1 under different flows and angles. Respir Care 2008;53(3):316-323.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Alves Silva CE,
    2. Santos JG,
    3. Jansen JM,
    4. de Melo PL

    . Laboratory evaluation of the Acapella device: pressure characteristics under different conditions, and a software tool to optimize its practical use. Respir Care 2009;54(11):1480-1487.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Alves CE,
    2. Nunes LQ,
    3. Melo PL

    . Mechanical analysis of an oscillatory positive expiratory pressure device used in respiratory rehabilitation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2010;(2010):2477-2480.
18. 18.↵
    1. King M,
    2. Phillips DM,
    3. Gross D,
    4. Vartian V,
    5. Chang HK,
    6. Zidulka A

    . Enhanced tracheal mucus clearance with high frequency chest wall compression. Am Rev Respir Dis 1983;128(3):511-515.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. King M,
    2. Phillips DM,
    3. Zidulka A,
    4. Chang HK

    . Tracheal mucus clearance in high-frequency oscillation. II: Chest wall versus mouth oscillation. Am Rev Respir Dis 1984;130(5):703-706

    OpenUrlPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Dasgupta B,
    2. Tomkiewicz RP,
    3. Boyd WA,
    4. Brown NE,
    5. King M

    . Effects of combined treatment with rhDNase and airflow oscillations on spinnability of cystic fibrosis sputum in vitro. Pediatr Pulmonol 1995;20(2):78-82.

    OpenUrlPubMed
21. 21.
    1. Dasgupta B,
    2. Brown NE,
    3. King M

    . Effects of sputum oscillations and rhDNase in vitro: a combined approach to treat cystic fibrosis lung disease. Pediatr Pulmonol 1998;26(4):250-255.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Dasgupta B,
    2. Tomkiewicz RP,
    3. Boyd WA,
    4. Brown NE,
    5. King M

    . Sputum rheology changes in cystic fibrosis lung disease following two different types of physiotherapy: flutter vs autogenic drainage. Chest 1998;114(1):171-177.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. App M,
    2. Kieselmann R,
    3. Reinhardt D,
    4. Lindemann H,
    5. Dasgupta B,
    6. King M,
    7. Brand P

    . Sputum rheology changes in cystic fibrosis lung disease following two different types of physiotherapy: flutter vs autogenic drainage. Chest 1998;114(1):171-177.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    1. Fink JB,
    2. Mahlmeiter MJ

    . High-frequency oscillation of the airway and chest wall. Respir Care 2002;47(7):797-807.

    OpenUrlPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Patterson JE,
    2. Bradley JM,
    3. Hewitt O,
    4. Elborn JS

    . Airway clearance in bronchiectasis: a randomized crossover trial of active cycle of breathing techniques versus Acapella. Respiration 2005;72(3):239-242.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    1. McCarren B,
    2. Alison JA

    . Physiological effects of vibration in subjects with cystic fibrosis. Eur Respir J 2006;27(6):1204-1209.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    1. Scherer TA,
    2. Barandun J,
    3. Martinez E,
    4. Wanner A,
    5. Rubin EM

    . Effect of high-frequency oral airway and chest wall oscillation and conventional chest physical therapy on expectoration in patients with stable cystic fibrosis. Chest 1998;113(4):1019-1027.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science