Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Top 10 Papers in 2018
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • Open Forum 2019
    • 2019 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Top 10 Papers in 2018
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • Open Forum 2019
    • 2019 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Follow aarc on Twitter
  • Visit aarc on Facebook
EditorialEditorials

Pediatric Extubation Readiness: Faith-Based Practice or Amenable to Standardization?

Brian M Cummings and Natan Noviski
Respiratory Care March 2014, 59 (3) 445-446; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.03103
Brian M Cummings
Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Massachusetts General Hospital Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Natan Noviski
Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Massachusetts General Hospital Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: nnoviski@partners.org
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Faith, defined as a firm belief in something for which there is no proof, is in contrast to observation and inference, in which we learn and make a conclusion about what the evidence tells us. If we fail to continue to observe and change our conclusions, then one can fall into a practice of faith. Is there opportunity to obtain new evidence, and move away from attempting to apply adult concepts to the weaning of mechanical ventilation in pediatrics, and form a basis for good practice? One way to approach this is to assess practice, identify what we do, apply respiratory developmental physiology, and contrast that with what we know.

In this issue of Respiratory Care, Mhanna et al provide an overview of what pediatric critical care providers think should be done prior to extubation in pediatric patients, as well as probe what they actually do.1 As with all surveys, we must take the answers with some skepticism, as the responses may not reflect true practice, but it does give us a perspective on current thinking among pediatric intensivists. Mhanna et al found that checking for an air leak, assessing secretion suctioning frequency, and sedation are the top items intensivists consider, and most do not consider airway occlusion pressure or the rapid shallow breathing index. Spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs) are performed mainly with pressure support. The majority of intensivists are looking for an air leak at 20–30 cm H2O peak airway pressure and a suctioning frequency of around every 2–4 hours. An interesting pearl in the survey is that there was no correlation based on institution, which suggests that individual clinician interpretation and approach somewhat overrides institutional practice.

No pediatric study has yet to improve upon the standard of when a clinician “feels” the patient is ready for extubation. The only prospective multi-center weaning and extubation trial in pediatrics found no difference in success based on approach,2 despite a much higher extubation failure rate than previously described in another large multi-center cohort (17% vs 6%).3 Studies of extubation readiness tests start from a baseline in which the clinician already feels the patient is ready to extubate, and it is difficult to determine what value the various assessments or tests add to the decision to extubate.4

If no approach is better then the clinician's clinical assessment, how does the clinician determine the patient is ready? Mhanna highlights the standard approach: to assess leak, secretions, do an SBT, and assess sedation. How do these stand up to the evidence?

The leak test reliability is positional, requiring neutral position and muscle relaxation,5 and yet in the pediatric ICU this may not be universally determined in this manner. There has been no consistency in the results of studies of cuff leak tests for predicting post-extubation failure or stridor, nor what level of leak or at what pressure is best to ensure success.6,7

The issue of tracheal secretions has never been studied in children. Do children do better with frequent suctioning if they are extubated or intubated? Is it better to cough it out or suction it out? Surely context matters: frequent suctioning on minimal oxygenation and ventilation means something different than higher ventilation needs. Is it secretion suctioning frequency, volume obtained, thickness, or color that is the critical piece in extubation failure? This remains a subject open for evaluation, and while observations of secretions have made it into clinical practice or just been adopted from adult practice or our mentors, no one has yet attempted to study this in a scientific fashion in pediatrics.

SBTs are feasible in children and may decrease the duration of mechanical ventilation in children, compared to clinician “feeling” of readiness.8 The preference for SBT with pressure support has become mainstream, despite no clear evidence of benefit over CPAP or T-piece alone, perhaps over continued misconceptions about endotracheal tube resistance.2 In addition, there is less reliance by intensivists on sedation scores when considering extubation, perhaps because it is an assessment at an individual point in time versus looking clinically at the patient to see if at that point the patient is awake.

One item that is poorly investigated in pediatrics in weaning trials is if there are developmental physiology factors based on a child's age and size that are relevant extubation predictors. Is comparing a 3-month-old and a 15-year-old for weaning using the same strategy valid? Factors like normal oxygen saturation range, carbon dioxide response curve, developmental changes in the trachea, chest wall, and diaphragmatic apposition in the chest may all play a role in extubation success. One might find a leak test is valid for a 15-year-old and unnecessary in a 3-month-old old, or vice versa. This may be the key to determining what can be extrapolated from adults, and what needs to be individually tailored based on growth-dependent respiratory physiology.

Overall, the data remain sparse about how to best approach extubation in pediatric critical care. “Faith” in one approach has yet to be supplanted by evidence in pediatric weaning of mechanical ventilation.

Footnotes

  • Correspondence: Natan Noviski MD, Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 175 Cambridge Street, CPZS-524, Boston MA 02114. E-mail: nnoviski{at}partners.org.
  • The authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

  • See the Original Study on Page 334

  • Copyright © 2014 by Daedalus Enterprises

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Mhanna MJ,
    2. Anderson IM,
    3. Iyer NP,
    4. Baumann A
    . The use of extubation readiness parameters: a survey of pediatric critical care physicians. Respir Care 2014;59(3):334-339.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Randolph AG,
    2. Wypij D,
    3. Venkataraman ST,
    4. Hanson JH,
    5. Gedeit RG,
    6. Meert KL,
    7. et al
    . Effect of mechanical ventilator weaning protocols on respiratory outcomes in infants and children: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002;288(20):2561-2568.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Kurachek SC,
    2. Newth CJ,
    3. Quasney MW,
    4. Rice T,
    5. Sachdeva RC,
    6. Patel NR,
    7. et al
    . Extubation failure in pediatric intensive care: a multiple-center study of risk factors and outcomes. Crit Care Med 2003;31(11):2657-2664.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Chavez A,
    2. de la Cruz R,
    3. Zaritsky A
    . Spontaneous breathing trial predicts successful extubation in infants and children. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2006;7(4):324-328.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Finholt DA,
    2. Henry DB,
    3. Raphaely RC
    . Factors affecting leak around tracheal tubes in children. Can Anaesth Soc J 1985;32(4):326-329.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Mhanna MJ,
    2. Zamel YB,
    3. Tichy CM,
    4. Super DM
    . The “air leak” test around the endotracheal tube, as a predictor of postextubation stridor, is age dependent in children. Crit Care Med 2002;30(12):2639-2643.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Wratney AT,
    2. Benjamin DK Jr.,
    3. Slonim AD,
    4. Hamel DS,
    5. Cheifetz IM
    . The endotracheal tube air leak test does not predict extubation outcome in critically ill pediatric patients. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2008;9(5):490-496.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Foronda FK,
    2. Troster EJ,
    3. Farias JA,
    4. Barbas CS,
    5. Ferraro AA,
    6. Faria LS,
    7. et al
    . The impact of daily evaluation and spontaneous breathing test on the duration of pediatric mechanical ventilation: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care Med 2011;39(11):2526-2533.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 59 (3)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 59, Issue 3
1 Mar 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Pediatric Extubation Readiness: Faith-Based Practice or Amenable to Standardization?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
Citation Tools
Pediatric Extubation Readiness: Faith-Based Practice or Amenable to Standardization?
Brian M Cummings, Natan Noviski
Respiratory Care Mar 2014, 59 (3) 445-446; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.03103

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Pediatric Extubation Readiness: Faith-Based Practice or Amenable to Standardization?
Brian M Cummings, Natan Noviski
Respiratory Care Mar 2014, 59 (3) 445-446; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.03103
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Reprints/Permissions

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© The Journal Respiratory Care Company

Powered by HighWire