Reduced FEV₁/FVC and FEV₁ in the Normal Range as a Physiological Variant

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Pellegrino R,
   2. Viegi G,
   3. Brusasco V,
   4. Crapo RO,
   5. Burgos F,
   6. Casaburi R,
   7. et al

   . Interpretative strategies for lung function tests. Eur Respir J 2005;26(5):948–968.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   Lung function testing: selection of reference values and interpretative strategies. American Thoracic Society. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991;144(5):1202–1218.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Ohar JA,
   2. Sadeghnejad A,
   3. Meyers DA,
   4. Donohue JF,
   5. Bleecker ER

   . Do symptoms predict COPD in smokers? Chest 2010;137(6):1345–1353.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Pereira CAC

   . Spirometry. In: Pereira CAC, Neder JA. Guidelines for Lung Function Tests. J Bras Pneumol 2002;28(Suppl 3):1–82.

   OpenUrl
5. 5.↵
   1. Barisione G,
   2. Crimi E,
   3. Bartolini S,
   4. Saporiti R,
   5. Copello F,
   6. Pellegrino R,
   7. Brusasco V

   . How to interpret reduced forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/vital capacity ratio with normal FEV1. Eur Respir J 2009;33(6):1396–1402.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Pereira CA,
   2. Sato T,
   3. Rodrigues SC

   . New reference values for forced spirometry in white adults in Brazil. J Bras Pneumol 2007;33(4):397–406.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Muller A

   1. Muller A

   . Spirometry and maximal expiratory flow-volume curves. In Muller A. (Ed): Pulmonary function tests in clinical and occupational disease. Orlando, FL: Grune & Stratton; 1986:15–52.
8. 8.↵
   1. Krowka MJ,
   2. Enright PL,
   3. Rodarte JR,
   4. Hyatt RE

   . Effect of effort on measurement of forced expiratory volume in one second. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987;136(4):829–833.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Aguiar VAN,
   2. Beppu OS,
   3. Romaldini H,
   4. Ratto OR,
   5. Nakatani J

   . Validity of a respiratory modified questionaire (ATS-DLS-78) as a tool of an epidemiologic study in Brazil. J Pneumol 1988;14(3):111–116.

   OpenUrl
10. 10.↵
    1. Kivity S,
    2. Solomon A,
    3. Schwarz Y,
    4. Trajber I,
    5. Topilsky M

    . Evaluation of asymptomatic subjects with low forced expiratory ratios (FEV1/VC). Thorax 1994;49(6):554–556.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Mead J

    . Dysanapsis in normal lungs assessed by the relationship between maximal flow, static recoil, and vital capacity. Am Rev Respir Dis 1980;121(2):339–342.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Martin TR,
    2. Castile RG,
    3. Fredberg JJ,
    4. Wohl ME,
    5. Mead J

    . Airway size is related to sex but not lung size in normal adults. J Appl Physiol 1987;63(5):2042–2047.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Sheel AW,
    2. Guenette JA,
    3. Yuan R,
    4. Holy L,
    5. Mayo JR,
    6. McWilliams AM,
    7. et al

    . Evidence for dysanapsis using computed tomographic imaging of the airways in older ex-smokers. J Appl Physiol 2009;107(5):1622–1628.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Ingram RH Jr.,
    2. Schilder DP

    . Effect of gas compression on pulmonary pressure, flow, and volume relationship. J Appl Physiol 1966;21(6):1821–1826.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Sharafkhaneh A,
    2. Babb TG,
    3. Officer TM,
    4. Hanania NA,
    5. Sharafkhaneh H,
    6. Boriek AM

    . The confounding effects of thoracic gas compression on measurement of acute bronchodilator response. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007;175(4):330–335.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Mead J,
    2. Turner JM,
    3. Macklem PT,
    4. Little JB

    . Significance of the relationship between lung recoil and maximum expiratory flow. J Appl Physiol 1967;22(1):95–108.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Hankinson JL,
    2. Odencrantz JR,
    3. Fedan KB

    . Spirometric reference values from a sample of the general U.S. population. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;159(1):179–187.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Quanjer PH,
    2. Stanojevic S,
    3. Cole TJ,
    4. Baur X,
    5. Hall GL,
    6. Culver BH,
    7. et al

    ; ERS Global Lung Function Initiative. Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3-95-yr age range: the global lung function 2012 equations. Eur Respir J 2012;40(6):1324–1343.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Linares-Perdomo O,
    2. Hegewald M,
    3. Collingridge DS,
    4. Blagev D,
    5. Jensen RL,
    6. Hankinson J,
    7. Morris AH

    . Comparison of NHANES III and ERS/GLI 12 for airway obstruction classification and severity. Eur Respir J 2016;48(1):133–141.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Pereira CA,
    2. Duarte AA,
    3. Gimenez A,
    4. Soares MR

    . Comparison between reference values for FVC, FEV1, and FEV1/FVC ratio in White adults in Brazil and those suggested by the Global Lung Function Initiative 2012. J Bras Pneumol 2014;40(4):397–402.

    OpenUrl
21. 21.↵
    1. Duarte AA,
    2. Pereira CA,
    3. Rodrigues SC

    . Validation of new Brazilian predicted values for forced spirometry in Caucasians and comparison with predicted values obtained using other reference equations. J Bras Pneumol 2007;33(5):527–535.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
22. 22.
    1. Boulet LP,
    2. Turcotte H,
    3. Brochu A

    . Persistence of airway obstruction and hyperresponsiveness in subjects with asthma remission. Chest 1994;105(4):1024–1031.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science