Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Top 10 Papers in 2020
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • Call for Abstracts 2021
    • 2020 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Top 10 Papers in 2020
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • Call for Abstracts 2021
    • 2020 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Follow aarc on Twitter
  • Visit aarc on Facebook
Article CommentaryEditor's Commentary

Editor's Commentary

Respiratory Care October 2020, 65 (10) i;
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The Editor's Choice is a comparison of vibrating mesh (VM), jet, and breath-enhanced nebulizers (BEN) during mechanical ventilation. Ashraf and colleagues used radiolabeled saline to evaluate inhaled mass and aerosol particle size with each device. Two nebulizers were placed on the dry side of the humidifier while the BEN was placed after the humidifier; the BEN was less sensitive to effects of humidification. VM nebulizer delivery was unpredictable due to failure to completely nebulize the solution in half the studies. They conclude that BEN technology ensured better control of drug delivery. In an accompanying editorial, Berlinski compares advantages and disadvantages of different nebulizers, arguing for improvements in technology and tailoring of devices for specific needs.

Kuch and others describe the impact of intravenous pulmonary vasodilators on human bronchial epithelial cells in culture. They used a glycine or arginine diluen t, both of which are alkaline, compared to a control. They found a reduction in ciliary beat frequency and increased cell death in treatment groups. Ciliary beat frequency ceased immediately after exposure to the drug preparation. The authors conclude that in ventilated patients these findings may result in important alterations in lung function. Rubin's accompanying editorial highlights the role of basic science in describing mechanistic effects , but tempers the import, pending in vivo studies.

Bourassa et al describe the automated titration of lo w-flow oxygen to subjects with COPD wear in g a gas mask. They compared the oxygen flow requirement to maintain a set oxygen saturation (Embedded Image) in subjects exposed to hypoxic gas mixtures. Both healthy and COPD subjects required a range of oxygen flow between O and 2.9 L/min to maintain Embedded Image. They found important reductions in the amount of oxygen delivered were obtained by use of automated oxygen delivery and targeted Sp02. Kaczka and others provide comment on the features and potential advantages of closed loop oxygen systems.

Moore and others describe the impact of nebulizer cleaning and drying on the potential for bacterial colonization in patients with cystic fibrosis. They compared several variables related to assembly /dis assembly, different cleaning solutions, and drying methods on the survival of P. aeruginosa. Complete nebulizer drying was essential for elimination of bacterial contamination of devices.

Moody et al evaluated jet and vibrating mesh nebulizers to deliver bronchodilators to pediatric asthma subjects in the emergency department. Subjects were treated according to a protocol, and the time to reach a mild asthma score, number of treatments, and hospital admission were recorded. Subjects treated with a mesh nebulizer required fewer treatments and achieved the desired reduction in asthma score more quickly.

Al-Subu et al performed a retrospective chart review of bronchodilator delivery via high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in pediatric subjects. They found heart rate increased during HFNC aerosol delivery versus traditional delivery methods, with no difference in other measures. Bronchodilator delivery using HFNC was feasible at low gas flows (2-4 L/min), but HFNC did not improve subjects' comfort, and it increased respiratory the rapists' bedside time.

In a cross-sectional observational trial, Ocakli et al evaluated the impact of gender on inhaler technique. Subject sociodemographic characteristics, inhaler the rapy, subject-reported difficulties, and clinician reported errors in inhaler technique were recorded. Errors were common. Subject-reported difficulties were more prevalent among women. A lack of training regarding inhaler technique predicted a higher likelihood of errors.

Herrero-Cortina and others evaluated the importance of sputum weight as a method for comparing airway clearance therapy in subjects with bronchiectasis. They collected sputum expectorated over 24 h on 2 separate days, with and without airway clearance therapy. They also determined the minimal important difference in sputum production. They concluded that when sputum weight is used as an outcome, multiple measurements should be included.

Holley and others evaluated post-deployment service members for isolated small airway dysfunction (SAD) during exercise testing. SAD was analyzed for association to ventilation parameters at exercise. They found poor agreement across tests use to detect SAD. The addition of SAD to lung function testing did not predict changes in response to exercise.

Ramirez and others performed a retrospective chart review in 30 mechanically ventil ated subjects to determine adherence to an oxygen therapy protocol. Subjects in the medical ICU placed on the oxygen therapy protocol experienced a significant delay in oxygen weaning. They suggest closer monitoring and adherence to the oxygen weaning protocol to reduce the potential risk for hyperoxia.

Grim et al evaluated the changes in attitudes and practice of oxygen therapy following implementation of a conservative oxygen guideline. The authors surveyed physicians before and after guideline initiation. After implementation, 5 ,840 subjects were admitted to 3 ICUs, and 101,869 ABGs were retrieved. Actual practice changed, with overall lower oxygenation levels (median PaO2 77 mm Hg, versus 86 mm Hg before implementation), and a decrease of PEEP and FIO2.

Nair and Smith evaluated a phased quality improvement (QI), intervention aimed at reducing unplanned extubation in the ICU. In a retrospective review they report 7.2 unplanned extubations/100 ventilator days. The QI process included standardizing endotracheal tube fixation, monitoring of fixation through checks, 2-person technique for care, and adverse event reporting. Following QI initiation, the rate of unplanned extubation fell to l.4/100 ventilator days.

Kalra and coworkers performed a retrospective study of tidal volume (VT) setting in subjects with ARDS, stratif yin g groups based on body mass index. Over half the subjects were classified as obese, with a fifth meeting criteria for morbid obesity. Subjects in the morbid obesity group were 3 times as likely to receive a VT of > 8 mL/kg on day 1 and required rescue therapies more frequently.

Metkus et al used the National Inpatient Sample to evaluate noninvasive ventilation (NIV) failure in subjects with acute heart failure. In nearly 280,000 subjects, NIV failure occurred in 1.5% of cases. Failure was associated with cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest resulting in a morality rate of 26% in the NIV failure group versus 6% in those successfully treated.

Miller and others utilized a national database to evaluate pediatric intubations by respiratory therapists (RTs). The authors collected data regarding the reason for intubation, drugs used, number of attempts, and adverse events. Only 1% of first intubation attempts were made by RTs. They also found that RTs had success rates similar to other providers, but higher adverse event rates. RTs were more lik ely to use video laryngoscopy.

Adherence to CPAP therapy at home remains a major impediment to its use. Avellan-Hietanen and colleagues evaluated subjects who had CPAP re-initiated following a failed CPAP trial. They found that subjects selected for a second trial had more severe sleep apnea compared to a control group of naïive users. After 1 year, 67% of the naïive subjects continued to use CPAP versus only 52% of subjects on their second trial. CPAP acceptance was higher among men than women.

Silva et al evaluated the impact of early passive exercise with a cycle ergometer on patient-ventilator interaction. In a small group of heavily sedated subjects, 20 min of passive leg exercises were followed by 10 min of rest. Despite sedation, the asynchrony index increased significantly compared to at rest. The two most frequent asynchronies were missed triggers and flow asynchrony.

Granchi and others evaluated the relationship of inhalation injury and deadspace in predicting injury severity and outcome. In this retrospective review of 51 subjects, a modified deadspace calculation found that deadspace was significantly higher in non-survivors, but the presence of pneumonia did not result in deadspace differences. They conclude that deadspace measures can be used to assess severity of injury and prognosis.

Shi et al provide a systematic review of radiographic bronchiectasis in COPD. They conclude that COPD-bronchiectasis phenotype had adverse effects on subjects' prognosis. Shan et al provide a systematic review on the use of NIV as a weaning strategy for hypoxemic respiratory failure. Using data from 6 trials, they note that NIV as a weaning strategy did not decrease hospital mortality, but did reduce ICU length of stay and adverse events.

D'Urzo and others provide a narrative review of the variation in spirometry interpretation algorithms. Lellouche and L'Her pen a fascinating review on monitoring oxygen therapy, with an eye toward early warning scores.

From the New Horizons Symposium, Newth et al describe ventilator weaning in pediatrics, and Walsh reviews the use of inhaled pulmonary vasodi lators in the PICU.

  • Copyright © 2020 by Daedalus Enterprises
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 65 (10)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 65, Issue 10
1 Oct 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Editor's Commentary
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Editor's Commentary
Respiratory Care Oct 2020, 65 (10) i;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Editor's Commentary
Respiratory Care Oct 2020, 65 (10) i;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Reprints/Permissions

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire