Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Top 10 Papers in 2020
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • Call for Abstracts 2021
    • 2020 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Top 10 Papers in 2020
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • Call for Abstracts 2021
    • 2020 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Follow aarc on Twitter
  • Visit aarc on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Effects of Zero PEEP and < 1.0 FIO2 on SpO2 and PETCO2 During Open Endotracheal Suctioning

Jacqueline Rodrigues de Freitas Vianna, Valéria Amorim Pires Di Lorenzo, Miléa Mara Lourenço da S Simões, Jorge Luís Guerra and Maurício Jamami
Respiratory Care December 2020, 65 (12) 1805-1814; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.07435
Jacqueline Rodrigues de Freitas Vianna
Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Intensive Care Physiotherapy, Santa Casa de Misericórdia Hospital, Batatais, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Valéria Amorim Pires Di Lorenzo
Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Miléa Mara Lourenço da S Simões
Intensive Care Physiotherapy, Santa Casa de Misericórdia Hospital, Batatais, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jorge Luís Guerra
Intensive Care Physiotherapy, Santa Casa de Misericórdia Hospital, Batatais, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maurício Jamami
Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hyperoxygenation and hyperinflation, preferably with a mechanical ventilator, is the most commonly used technique to prevent the adverse effects of open endotracheal suctioning on arterial oxygenation and pulmonary volume. However, limited data are available on the effects of oxygen concentrations < 100% and PEEP with zero end-expiratory pressure (0 PEEP) to improve oxygenation and to maintain adequate ventilation during open endotracheal suctioning. The aim of this study was to analyze the behavior of Embedded Image and end-tidal CO2 pressure (Embedded Image ) in open endotracheal suctioning using the 0 PEEP technique with baseline Embedded Image (0 PEEP baseline Embedded Image ) and 0 PEEP + hyperoxygenation of 20% above the baseline value (0 PEEP Embedded Image + 0.20) in critically ill subjects receiving mechanical ventilation.

METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, single-blind crossover study, for which 48 subjects with various clinical and surgical conditions were selected; of these, 38 subjects completed the study. The subjects were randomized for 2 interventions: 0 PEEP baseline Embedded Image and 0 PEEP Embedded Image + 0.20 during the open endotracheal suctioning procedure. Oxygenation was assessed via oxygen saturation as measured with pulse oximetry (Embedded Image ), and changes in lung were monitored via Embedded Image using volumetric capnography.

RESULTS: In the intragroup analysis with 0 PEEP baseline Embedded Image , there was no significant increase after open endotracheal suctioning in either Embedded Image (P = .63) or Embedded Image (P = .11). With 0 PEEP Embedded Image + 0.20, there was a significant increase in Embedded Image (P < .001), with no significant changes in Embedded Image (P = .55). In the intergroup comparisons, there was a significant increase compared to the basal values only with the 0 PEEP + 0.20 method at 1 min after hyperoxygenation (P < .001), post-immediately (P < .001), at 1 min after (P < .001), and at 2 min after open endotracheal suctioning (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS: The appropriate indication of the hyperinflation strategy via mechanical ventilation using 0 PEEP with or without hyperoxygenation proved to be efficient to maintain Embedded Image and Embedded Image levels. These results suggest that the technique can minimize the loss of lung volume due to open endotracheal suctioning. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT02440919).

  • suction
  • mechanical ventilation
  • pulmonary ventilation
  • physical therapy modalities
  • oxygen
  • capnography

Footnotes

  • Correspondence: Jacqueline Rodrigues de Freitas Vianna PT PhD, Av Comandante Salgado, 428 B, Castelo, Batatais, CEP 14300 220, São Paulo, Brazil. E-mail: jacrfvianna{at}uol.com.br
  • See the Related Editorial on Page 1939

  • The authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

  • Copyright © 2020 by Daedalus Enterprises
View Full Text

Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 1 day for US$15.00

Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 65 (12)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 65, Issue 12
1 Dec 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effects of Zero PEEP and < 1.0 FIO2 on SpO2 and PETCO2 During Open Endotracheal Suctioning
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Effects of Zero PEEP and < 1.0 FIO2 on SpO2 and PETCO2 During Open Endotracheal Suctioning
Jacqueline Rodrigues de Freitas Vianna, Valéria Amorim Pires Di Lorenzo, Miléa Mara Lourenço da S Simões, Jorge Luís Guerra, Maurício Jamami
Respiratory Care Dec 2020, 65 (12) 1805-1814; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.07435

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Effects of Zero PEEP and < 1.0 FIO2 on SpO2 and PETCO2 During Open Endotracheal Suctioning
Jacqueline Rodrigues de Freitas Vianna, Valéria Amorim Pires Di Lorenzo, Miléa Mara Lourenço da S Simões, Jorge Luís Guerra, Maurício Jamami
Respiratory Care Dec 2020, 65 (12) 1805-1814; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.07435
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Keywords

  • suction
  • mechanical ventilation
  • pulmonary ventilation
  • physical therapy modalities
  • oxygen
  • capnography

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Reprints/Permissions

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire