This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Postextubation respiratory support in pediatric ARDS may be used to support the recovering respiratory system and promote timely, successful liberation from mechanical ventilation. This study’s aims were to (1) describe the use of postextubation respiratory support in pediatric ARDS from the time of extubation to hospital discharge, (2) identify potential risk factors for postextubation respiratory support, and (3) provide preliminary data for future larger studies.
METHODS: This pilot single-center prospective cohort study recruited subjects with pediatric ARDS. Subjects’ respiratory status up to hospital discharge, the use of postextubation respiratory support, and how it changed over time were recorded. Analysis was performed comparing subjects who received postextubation respiratory support versus those who did not and compared its use among pediatric ARDS severity categories. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine variables associated with the use of postextubation respiratory support and included oxygenation index (OI), ventilator duration, and weight.
RESULTS: Seventy-three subjects with pediatric ARDS, with median age and OI of 4 (0.6–10.5) y and 7.3 (4.9–12.7), respectively, were analyzed. Postextubation respiratory support was provided to 54/73 (74%) subjects: 28/45 (62.2%), 19/21 (90.5%), and 7/7 (100%) for mild, moderate, and severe pediatric ARDS, respectively, (P = .01). OI and mechanical ventilation duration were higher in subjects who received postextubation respiratory support (8.7 [5.4–14] vs 4.6 [3.7–7], P < .001 and 10 [7–17] d vs 4 [2–7] d, P < .001) compared to those who did not. At hospital discharge, 12/67 (18.2%) survivors received home respiratory support (6 subjects died prior to hospital discharge). In the multivariable model, ventilator duration (adjusted odds ratio 1.3 [95% CI 1.0–1.7], P = .050) and weight (adjusted odds ratio 0.95 [95% CI 0.91–0.99], P = .02) were associated with the use of postextubation respiratory support.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of intubated subjects with pediatric ARDS received respiratory support postextubation, and a substantial proportion continued to require it up to hospital discharge.
- artificial respiration
- noninvasive ventilation
- oxygen inhalation therapy
- acute lung injury
- ARDS
- pediatric ICU
- critical care outcomes
Footnotes
- Correspondence: Judith Ju Ming Wong MBBCh, Children’s Intensive Care Unit, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, Singapore 229899. E-mail: judith.wong.jm{at}singhealth.com.sg
- Copyright © 2024 by Daedalus Enterprises
Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 1 day for US$30.00
Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.