RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 A Turbine-Driven Ventilator Improves Adherence to Advanced Cardiac Life Support Guidelines During a Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Simulation JF Respiratory Care FD American Association for Respiratory Care SP 1166 OP 1170 DO 10.4187/respcare.05368 VO 62 IS 9 A1 Scott G Allen A1 Lara Brewer A1 Erik S Gillis A1 Nathan L Pace A1 Derek J Sakata A1 Joseph A Orr YR 2017 UL http://rc.rcjournal.com/content/62/9/1166.abstract AB BACKGROUND: Research has shown that increased breathing frequency during cardiopulmonary resuscitation is inversely correlated with systolic blood pressure. Rescuers often hyperventilate during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Current American Heart Association advanced cardiac life support recommends a ventilation rate of 8–10 breaths/min. We hypothesized that a small, turbine-driven ventilator would allow rescuers to adhere more closely to advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) guidelines.METHODS: Twenty-four ACLS-certified health-care professionals were paired into groups of 2. Each team performed 4 randomized rounds of 2-min cycles of CPR on an intubated mannikin, with individuals altering between compressions and breaths. Two rounds of CPR were performed with a self-inflating bag, and 2 rounds were with the ventilator. The ventilator was set to deliver 8 breaths/min, pressure limit 22 cm H2O. Frequency, tidal volume (VT), peak inspiratory pressure, and compression interruptions (hands-off time) were recorded. Data were analyzed with a linear mixed model and Welch 2-sample t test.RESULTS: The median (interquartile range [IQR]) frequency with the ventilator was 7.98 (7.98–7.99) breaths/min. Median (IQR) frequency with the self-inflating bag was 9.5 (8.2–10.7) breaths/min. Median (IQR) ventilator VT was 0.5 (0.5–0.5) L. Median (IQR) self-inflating bag VT was 0.6 (0.5–0.7) L. Median (IQR) ventilator peak inspiratory pressure was 22 (22–22) cm H2O. Median (IQR) self-inflating bag peak inspiratory pressure was 30 (27–35) cm H2O. Mean ± SD hands-off times for ventilator and self-inflating bag were 5.25 ± 2.11 and 6.41 ± 1.45 s, respectively.CONCLUSIONS: When compared with a ventilator, volunteers ventilated with a self-inflating bag within ACLS guidelines. However, volunteers ventilated with increased variation, at higher VT levels, and at higher peak pressures with the self-inflating bag. Hands-off time was also significantly lower with the ventilator. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT02743299.)