RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Design and Function of a New Conical Positive Expiratory Pressure Device to Be Used During Exercise JF Respiratory Care FD American Association for Respiratory Care SP 966 OP 980 DO 10.4187/respcare.06049 VO 63 IS 8 A1 Chatchai Phimphasak A1 Chulee Ubolsakka-Jones A1 David A Jones YR 2018 UL http://rc.rcjournal.com/content/63/8/966.abstract AB BACKGROUND: A flow-dependent conical positive expiratory pressure (PEP) resistor incorporated into a oronasal mask was developed, which might reduce dyspnea and dynamic hyperinflation and increase exercise endurance for patients with COPD. We reported here the flow-pressure relationships and the safety and suitability of the device when used by healthy young and older subjects.METHODS: The flow-pressure relationships were determined for a range of resistors with different orifice diameters and cone lengths. A 1-cm conical-PEP device with a 6- or 7-mm orifice was used during a cycle exercise test (60% heart rate reserve) in 15 young (mean ± SD, 24.3 ± 3.9 y) and 12 older (mean ± SD, 64.4 ± 3.5 y) adults. Cardiopulmonary function and dyspnea were monitored for up to 10 min of exercise.RESULTS: For a given flow, pressure decreased as the cone length and orifice size increased. A 1-cm cone with a 6 mm orifice generated pressures of 5.24 ± 0.17 cm H2O and 18.29 ± 0.34 cm H2O at flows of 0.5 and 0.9 L/s, while for a 7 mm orifice, pressures were 4.88 ± 0.13 cm H2O and 19.14 ± 0.10 cm H2O at flows of 0.5 and 1.1 L/s, such as might occur during exercise. The choice of orifice size for a subject depended on his or her estimated expiratory flow; larger flows required the larger orifice to generate an expiratory pressure of between 5 and 20 cm H2O. Breathing with the conical-PEP device did not affect exercise time, dyspnea, minute ventilation, heart rate, or blood pressure. The SpO2 was slightly lower and PETCO2 was somewhat higher than during control exercise, but the differences were not significant. There were no adverse physiological consequences.CONCLUSIONS: A conical-PEP device of 1-cm length with an orifice of 6 or 7 mm generates effective expiratory pressure for most subjects during exercise. There were no adverse effects in healthy young and older subjects, and the device is suitable for trials with patients with COPD. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT 02788370.)