%0 Journal Article %A Yves de Souza %A Kenia Maynard da Silva %A Diego Condesso %A Bianca Figueira %A Arnaldo J Noronha Filho %A Rogério Rufino %A Rik Gosselink %A Cláudia H da Costa %T Use of a Home-Based Manual as Part of a Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program %D 2018 %R 10.4187/respcare.05656 %J Respiratory Care %P 1485-1491 %V 63 %N 12 %X BACKGROUND: Pulmonary rehabilitation programs improve exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with COPD. Domiciliary strategies to maintain these benefits have been proposed.OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether a rehabilitation manual would facilitate the maintenance of the benefits acquired during out-patient pulmonary rehabilitation.METHODS: Fifty subjects with stable COPD were included (26 women and 24 men). All the subjects were evaluated during screening and after 12 wk of out-patient rehabilitation, and then were randomly divided into 2 groups, with one group that received the rehabilitation manual for home use (manual group) and the other group only received verbal recommendations (control group). At this point, the 2 groups were similar. After 12 wk at home, both groups were evaluated a third time. All evaluations included a 6-min walk test (6MWT), 6-min step test, COPD Assessment Test, and measurement of dyspnea by using the modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale.RESULTS: When comparing the results of the 6MWT and 6-min step test done at out-patient discharge and after 12 wk at home, the manual group presented no differences (6MWT, 0 ± 25 m; 6-min step test, 1 ± 32 steps), whereas the control subjects lost part of the gain obtained during rehabilitation (6MWT −46 ± 36 m; 6-min step test −39 ± 33 steps). There was a significant difference between the groups (P < .05). When comparing the same time points, the change in the COPD Assessment Test score was −1 ± 1 for the manual group and 1 ± 2 for the control group (P = .01). For the modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale, the change in score was 0 ± 1 for the manual group and 1 ± 1 for the control group (P = .01).CONCLUSIONS: The use of a simple, well-illustrated manual facilitated the maintenance of the benefits acquired in out-patient pulmonary rehabilitation over a period of 3 months after study termination. %U https://rc.rcjournal.com/content/respcare/63/12/1485.full.pdf