RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Use of a Home-Based Manual as Part of a Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program
JF Respiratory Care
FD American Association for Respiratory Care
SP 1485
OP 1491
DO 10.4187/respcare.05656
VO 63
IS 12
A1 de Souza, Yves
A1 da Silva, Kenia Maynard
A1 Condesso, Diego
A1 Figueira, Bianca
A1 Noronha Filho, Arnaldo J
A1 Rufino, Rogério
A1 Gosselink, Rik
A1 da Costa, Cláudia H
YR 2018
UL http://rc.rcjournal.com/content/63/12/1485.abstract
AB BACKGROUND: Pulmonary rehabilitation programs improve exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with COPD. Domiciliary strategies to maintain these benefits have been proposed.OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether a rehabilitation manual would facilitate the maintenance of the benefits acquired during out-patient pulmonary rehabilitation.METHODS: Fifty subjects with stable COPD were included (26 women and 24 men). All the subjects were evaluated during screening and after 12 wk of out-patient rehabilitation, and then were randomly divided into 2 groups, with one group that received the rehabilitation manual for home use (manual group) and the other group only received verbal recommendations (control group). At this point, the 2 groups were similar. After 12 wk at home, both groups were evaluated a third time. All evaluations included a 6-min walk test (6MWT), 6-min step test, COPD Assessment Test, and measurement of dyspnea by using the modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale.RESULTS: When comparing the results of the 6MWT and 6-min step test done at out-patient discharge and after 12 wk at home, the manual group presented no differences (6MWT, 0 ± 25 m; 6-min step test, 1 ± 32 steps), whereas the control subjects lost part of the gain obtained during rehabilitation (6MWT −46 ± 36 m; 6-min step test −39 ± 33 steps). There was a significant difference between the groups (P < .05). When comparing the same time points, the change in the COPD Assessment Test score was −1 ± 1 for the manual group and 1 ± 2 for the control group (P = .01). For the modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale, the change in score was 0 ± 1 for the manual group and 1 ± 1 for the control group (P = .01).CONCLUSIONS: The use of a simple, well-illustrated manual facilitated the maintenance of the benefits acquired in out-patient pulmonary rehabilitation over a period of 3 months after study termination.