TY - JOUR T1 - Management of Tracheostomy: A Survey of Dutch Intensive Care Units JF - Respiratory Care SP - 1709 LP - 1715 VL - 53 IS - 12 AU - Denise P Veelo AU - Marcus J Schultz AU - Kai YN Phoa AU - Dave A Dongelmans AU - Jan M Binnekaded AU - Peter E Spronk Y1 - 2008/12/01 UR - http://rc.rcjournal.com/content/53/12/1709.abstract N2 - OBJECTIVE: To determine tracheostomy-management practices in Dutch intensive care units (ICUs) and post-ICU step-down facilities. METHODS: We surveyed the physician medical directors of all Dutch nonpediatric ICUs that have > 5 beds suitable for mechanical ventilation. The survey asked for demographic information about the hospital and ICU setting, and for information and opinions about tracheostomy management in the ICU and step-down facilities, and the use of tracheostomy-management guidelines. RESULTS: Forty-four of the 69 ICUs responded. Sixty-four percent of the respondent ICUs only deflate the cuff when the patient is breathing spontaneously, without assistance from the ventilator. Fifty-nine percent do not routinely change the tracheostomy tube. Almost half use inner cannulas in tracheostomy tubes. Overall, intensivists were most often involved in the follow-up of discharged tracheostomized patients. In the nonacademic hospitals, specialized ICU nurses were more often involved (P = .05). Sixty-four percent indicated they have no guideline for managing discharged tracheostomized patients. There was a diversity of opinion (median visual-analog-scale score 5.0, 95% confidence interval 3.0 to 8.0) on whether the tracheostomy tube should be removed “at once” or after “down-sizing.e large differences in tracheostomy management among Dutch ICUs. ICU and post-ICU tracheostomy-management guidelines are lacking and needed. ER -