RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Effects of 0 PEEP and < 1.0 FIO2 on SpO2 and PETCO2 During Open Endotracheal Suctioning JF Respiratory Care FD American Association for Respiratory Care SP respcare.07435 DO 10.4187/respcare.07435 A1 Jacqueline Rodrigues de Freitas Vianna A1 Valéria Amorim Pires Di Lorenzo A1 Miléa Mara Lourenço da S Simões A1 Jorge Luís Guerra A1 Maurício Jamami YR 2020 UL http://rc.rcjournal.com/content/early/2020/07/07/respcare.07435.abstract AB BACKGROUND: Hyperoxygenation and hyperinflation, preferably with a mechanical ventilator, is the most commonly used technique to prevent the adverse effects of open endotracheal suctioning on arterial oxygenation and pulmonary volume. However, limited data are available on the effects of oxygen concentrations < 100% and PEEP with zero end-expiratory pressure (0 PEEP) to improve oxygenation and to maintain adequate ventilation during open endotracheal suctioning. The aim of this study was to analyze the behavior of SpO2 and end-tidal CO2 pressure (PETCO2) in open endotracheal suctioning using the 0 PEEP technique with baseline FIO2 (0 PEEP baseline FIO2) and 0 PEEP + hyperoxygenation of 20% above the baseline value (0 PEEP FIO2 + 0.20) in critically ill subjects receiving mechanical ventilation.METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, single-blind crossover study, for which 48 subjects with various clinical and surgical conditions were selected; of these, 38 subjects completed the study. The subjects were randomized for 2 interventions: 0 PEEP baseline FIO2 and 0 PEEP FIO2 + 0.20 during the open endotracheal suctioning procedure. Oxygenation was assessed via oxygen saturation as measured with pulse oximetry (SpO2), and changes in lung were monitored via PETCO2 using volumetric capnography.RESULTS: In the intragroup analysis with 0 PEEP baseline FIO2, there was no significant increase after open endotracheal suctioning in either SpO2 (P = .63) or PETCO2 (P = .11). With 0 PEEP FIO2 + 0.20, there was a significant increase in SpO2 (P < .001), with no significant changes in PETCO2 (P = .55). In the intergroup comparisons, there was a significant increase compared to the basal values only with the 0 PEEP + 0.20 method at 1 min after hyperoxygenation (P < .001), post-immediately (P < .001), at 1 min after (P < .001), and at 2 min after open endotracheal suctioning (P < .001).CONCLUSIONS: The appropriate indication of the hyperinflation strategy via mechanical ventilation using 0 PEEP with or without hyperoxygenation proved to be efficient to maintain SpO2 and PETCO2 levels. These results suggest that the technique can minimize the loss of lung volume due to open endotracheal suctioning.