RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Assessment of Patient Safety Attitudes Among Respiratory Therapists
JF Respiratory Care
FD American Association for Respiratory Care
SP 3566309
VO 66
IS Suppl 10
A1 Gochenour, Daniel
A1 Everhart, Jeannine
A1 Poulsen, Chase
A1 Wright, Douglas
A1 Dane, Francis
YR 2021
UL http://rc.rcjournal.com/content/66/Suppl_10/3566309.abstract
AB Background: Data reporting patient safety attitudes of respiratory therapists (RTs) in the United States is limited. Positive patient safety attitudes have been associated with improved outcome measures such as employee retention, reduced medication errors, and decreased length of stay. This study reported patient safety attitudes of RTs to determine which attributes correlated with a greater safety score. Methods: A non-experimental, cross-sectional study design using the safety attitudes questionnaire (SAQ) was employed. To be included in this IRB approved study, participants were required to be an RT and a member of the VA Society for Respiratory Care. Primary recruitment was through AARConnect with a link to the electronic survey. Variables were dichotomized by categorizing the attributes of having 10 or more years of experience, being 40 years old or older, having a baccalaureate or graduate degree in respiratory therapy, having a baccalaureate or graduate degree in any field, obtaining a specialty credential, or earning the RRT credential, and relating these to the SAQ score. A multiple regression model was deployed to determine which attributes lead to a more positive patient safety score. An alpha level was set to P < .05. Results: 145 participants completed the survey resulting in a 13% response rate. The SAQ exhibited high internal consistency with Cronbach’s alpha of 0.93. The primary outcome was comparison of SAQ scores and the 6 study attributes. ANOVA indicated the predictors accounted for a significant proportion of the variance regarding patient safety attitude (F (8, 135) = 2.506, P = .014); R2 was 0.129, representing almost 13% of variance for the SAQ scores. Obtaining a specialty credential was the only significant predictor; there is a nearly a 5-point higher safety score for those who have a specialty credential compared to those who do not have a specialty credential. Conclusions: There is a significant difference in patient safety attitudes of RTs who have obtained a specialty credential. These results are similar to data reported from the nursing literature on the benefits of obtaining a specialty credential. Further research should be conducted to determine the importance of earning a specialty credential, earning a BSRT, and obtaining the RRT credential. Investigation into these attributes on a national level could help to provide evidence-based recommendation for education and credentials.