PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Tran, Linh N
AU  - Rosen, Jared E
AU  - Pearce, Alex K
AU  - Malhotra, Atul
AU  - Buhr, Russell G
AU  - Saggar, Ragan
AU  - Davis, Jeffrey A
AU  - Martin, Jennifer L
AU  - Kamdar, Biren B
TI  - Adaptive Pressure Control–Continuous Mandatory Ventilation Versus Volume Control–Continuous Mandatory Ventilation: Factors Associated With Initiation, Maintenance, and Adjustment
AID  - 10.4187/respcare.11430
DP  - 2024 Dec 01
TA  - Respiratory Care
PG  - 1491--1498
VI  - 69
IP  - 12
4099  - http://rc.rcjournal.com/content/69/12/1491.short
4100  - http://rc.rcjournal.com/content/69/12/1491.full
AB  - BACKGROUND: Adaptive pressure control–continuous mandatory ventilation (APC-CMV) is a frequently utilized ventilator mode in ICU settings. This analysis compared APC-CMV and traditional volume control–continuous mandatory ventilation (VC-CMV) mode, describing factors associated with initiation, maintenance, and changes in settings of each mode.METHODS: We analyzed ventilator data from a retrospective electronic health record data set collected as part of a quality improvement project in a single academic ICU. The majority ventilator mode was defined as the mode comprising the highest proportion of mechanical ventilation time. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify variables associated with initial and majority APC-CMV or VC-CMV modes. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to compare ventilator setting changes/d and sedation as a function of APC-CMV and VC-CMV majority modes.RESULTS: Among 1,213 subjects initiated on mechanical ventilation from January 2013–March 2017, 68% and 24% were initiated on APC-CMV and VC-CMV, respectively, which composed 62% and 21% of the majority ventilator modes. Age, sex, race, and ethnicity were not associated with the initial or majority APC-CMV or VC-CMV modes. Subjects initiated on APC-CMV spent 88% of the mechanical ventilation time on APC-CMV mode. Compared to VC-CMV, subjects with APC-CMV majority mode experienced more ventilator setting changes/d (1.1 vs 0.8, P < .001). There were no significant differences in sedative medications when comparing subjects receiving APC-CMV versus VC-CMV majority modes.CONCLUSIONS: APC-CMV was highly utilized in the medical ICU. Subjects on APC-CMV had more ventilator setting changes/d than those on VC-CMV. APC-CMV offered no advantage of reduced setting adjustments or less sedation compared to VC-CMV.