Effect of deep inspiration on airway conductance in subjects with allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma

https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-6749(77)90081-1Get rights and content

Abstract

We measured specific airway conductance (GawVtg) in a body plethysmograph before and after a deep inspiratory maneuver in 8 subjects with allergic rhinitis and 8 subjects with allergic asthma. In hay fever subjects deep inspiration had no effect on GawVtg if it was performed in the control state; however, when methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction was present, deep inspiration transiently increased GawVtg. In asthmatic subjects deep inspiration was followed by a transient fall in baseline GawVtg in the control state; however, when bronchoconstriction was present, deep inspiration was followed by small and variable changes in GawVtg in 7 subjects and marked improvement in GawVtg in 1 subject. In asthmatic subjects the bronchoconstrictor response to deep inspiration performed in the control state is thought to be due to reflex changes in bronchomotor tone mediated by cholinergic (vagal) nerve pathways. Like asthmatic subjects, hay fever subjects also possess cholinergic-mediated airway hyperreactivity compared with normals. Our results indicate that, in spite of their increased airway reactivity, hay fever subjects respond more like normal subjects than like asthmatic subjects after a deep inspiratory maneuver.

References (13)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (58)

  • Mechanopharmacology of Rho-kinase antagonism in airway smooth muscle and potential new therapy for asthma

    2020, Pharmacological Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    The lack of DI benefit is now recognized as a characteristic phenotype of asthma [8]. Regardless of when DIs are taken, either before (bronchoprotection) [9,10] or during bronchoconstriction (bronchodilation) [11,12], the beneficial relaxing effect of DI is mostly absent in asthmatic subjects. Although the exact mechanisms for DI-induced bronchoprotection and bronchodilation in healthy subjects and the lack of such DI effect in asthmatics are still not clear, several theories have been proposed over the years to explain how the lack of bronchodilatory response to DI could contribute to AHR in asthma [8,13].

  • An in silico study examining the role of airway smooth muscle dynamics and airway compliance on the rate of airway re-narrowing after deep inspiration

    2020, Respiratory Physiology and Neurobiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Asthmatic patients also show limited bronchodilation of constricted airways as compared with non-asthma (Fish et al., 1981; Salome et al., 2003). Fish et al. (1977) in their study of response of patients with asthma and allergic rhinitis (irritation and inflammation of the mucous membrane inside the nose) first suggested that important clues of the mechanism of airway hyperresponsiveness (increased sensitivity of the airways to an inhaled constrictor) may be found in the different response to DI experienced by asthmatics and non-asthmatics. They studied the response of patients to inhaled methacholine (MCh) before and after and showed that asthmatic subjects exhibits greater airway closure than non-asthmatics.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Supported by grants from the Chicago Lung Association and by National Institutes of Health Pulmonary Young Investigator Award No. 1R23HL19577-01 (Dr. Fish).

Recipient of the Edward L. Trudeau Fellowship Award of the American Lung Association.

View full text