Diagnosis and Recommended Management of Esophageal Perforation and Rupture

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(10)62725-7Get rights and content

Abstract

Over the past 47 years (1937 to 1984), a total of 127 patients with esophageal perforation or rupture were evaluated at Duke Medical Center or the Durham Veterans Administration Medical Center. In 13 patients, the diagnosis was established at the time of autopsy and in the remaining 114, the diagnosis was established clinically. The etiology, radiological findings, underlying esophageal disease, time interval between onset of symptoms and therapy, and eventual outcome were evaluated. Patients with anastomotic leaks and those in whom carcinoma resulted in perforation or fistula were excluded. Iatrogenic causes were responsible for 55% of perforations, followed by spontaneous rupture in 15%, foreign body perforation in 14%, and traumatic perforation in 10%. Of the 127 patients, 114 underwent treatment involving primary closure (43%), drainage alone (28%), resection (9%), or nonoperative therapy (20%). The overall mortality among these 114 patients was 21%. Fourteen patients sustained a major complication requiring additional operative intervention. The overall mortality among patients requiring reoperation was 57%. Survival was significantly influenced by a delay in treatment of greater than 24 hours. With the exception of nonoperative therapy, survival was improved for all forms of treatment instituted within 24 hours. Primary closure within 24 hours resulted in the most favorable outcome (92% survival). In addition to early treatment, other factors associated with a favorable outcome included traumatic perforation (100% survival), foreign-body perforations (94% survival), and iatrogenic causes (80% survival). Spontaneous rupture resulted in the lowest survival (37%). The incidence of esophageal perforation has increased dramatically since 1967. Despite this increasing incidence, a trend toward earlier diagnosis and improvement in survival is documented. Twenty-seven patients have been treated since 1979 without any deaths.

References (20)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (263)

  • Esophago-pleural fistula

    2022, American Journal of the Medical Sciences
  • Perforation of gastroesophageal junction, stomach, and diaphragm following blunt abdominal trauma: A near miss: A case report

    2021, International Journal of Surgery Case Reports
    Citation Excerpt :

    High-velocity automobile accidents crush injuries and endoscopic interventions share a major etiological proportion for traumatic esophageal perforation while other modes are uncommon precedence. Within the esophageal tube, most of the perforations occur along the cervical esophagus, followed by the distal esophagus [1–4]. Indeed, Gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) perforation combined with gastric perforation is a rare occurrence following blunt trauma presumably because of their low mobility within the abdominal cavity.

  • Esophageal rupture after suppression of vomiting

    2018, Visual Journal of Emergency Medicine
  • Unrecognized Esophageal Perforation After Liver Transplantation

    2018, Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
View all citing articles on Scopus

Presented in part at the Thirty-second Annual Meeting of the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association, Boca Raton, FL, Nov 7–9, 1985.

Supported in part by Grants Nos. HL32086 and HL09315 from the National Institutes of Health.

1

Address reprint requests to Dr. Lowe, Department of Surgery, Box 3954, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.

View full text