Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 374, Issue 9686, 25–31 July 2009, Pages 293-300
The Lancet

Articles
Etomidate versus ketamine for rapid sequence intubation in acutely ill patients: a multicentre randomised controlled trial

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60949-1Get rights and content

Summary

Background

Critically ill patients often require emergency intubation. The use of etomidate as the sedative agent in this context has been challenged because it might cause a reversible adrenal insufficiency, potentially associated with increased in-hospital morbidity. We compared early and 28-day morbidity after a single dose of etomidate or ketamine used for emergency endotracheal intubation of critically ill patients.

Methods

In this randomised, controlled, single-blind trial, 655 patients who needed sedation for emergency intubation were prospectively enrolled from 12 emergency medical services or emergency departments and 65 intensive care units in France. Patients were randomly assigned by a computerised random-number generator list to receive 0·3 mg/kg of etomidate (n=328) or 2 mg/kg of ketamine (n=327) for intubation. Only the emergency physician enrolling patients was aware of group assignment. The primary endpoint was the maximum score of the sequential organ failure assessment during the first 3 days in the intensive care unit. We excluded from the analysis patients who died before reaching the hospital or those discharged from the intensive care unit before 3 days (modified intention to treat). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00440102.

Findings

234 patients were analysed in the etomidate group and 235 in the ketamine group. The mean maximum SOFA score between the two groups did not differ significantly (10·3 [SD 3·7] for etomidate vs 9·6 [3·9] for ketamine; mean difference 0·7 [95% CI 0·0–1·4], p=0·056). Intubation conditions did not differ significantly between the two groups (median intubation difficulty score 1 [IQR 0–3] in both groups; p=0·70). The percentage of patients with adrenal insufficiency was significantly higher in the etomidate group than in the ketamine group (OR 6·7, 3·5–12·7). We recorded no serious adverse events with either study drug.

Interpretation

Our results show that ketamine is a safe and valuable alternative to etomidate for endotracheal intubation in critically ill patients, and should be considered in those with sepsis.

Funding

French Ministry of Health.

Introduction

Critically ill patients often require emergency orotracheal intubation for airway control. Rapid sequence intubation with administration of a sedative and a paralytic agent is common. Etomidate is the sedative-hypnotic drug that is most often used in rapid sequence intubation, but its use has been challenged because it can cause a reversible adrenal insufficiency by dose-dependent inhibition of 11β-hydroxylase.1, 2

Several studies have suggested an association between the use of etomidate and the occurrence of adrenal insufficiency and increased morbidity in critically ill or injured patients, particularly in those with sepsis.3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Because adrenal insufficiency when a patient is critically ill can increase the risk of death, several investigators have advised against the use of etomidate, even as a single bolus.9 However, no causal link has been established between its use and an increase in morbidity and mortality.

Etomidate's haemodynamic tolerance, even in patients with shock, and the excellent intubation conditions provided have to be weighed against potential adverse effects, including adrenal insufficiency.10 A possible alternative to etomidate is ketamine, which is not known to inhibit the adrenal axis. The aim of this randomised controlled study was to compare early and 28-day morbidity after a single dose of etomidate or ketamine used for emergency endotracheal intubation of critically ill patients.

Section snippets

Study setting and patients

This prospective, randomised, controlled, single-blind (caregiver) trial was undertaken from April 25, 2007, to Feb 27, 2008, by 12 emergency medical services or emergency departments and 65 intensive care units in France. The emergency medical services are ambulance base stations equipped with one or more mobile intensive care units, consisting of an ambulance driver, a nurse, and a senior emergency physician as the minimum team.11

Patients who were 18 years or older and who needed sedation for

Results

Figure 1 shows the trial profile. Of the 689 patients assessed for eligibility, 655 were consecutively and randomly assigned to treatment and 650 were analysed (ITT population; figure 1). All allocated treatments were delivered to the randomised patients. The mITT analysis was undertaken in 469 patients (n=234 in etomidate group and n=235 in ketamine group). The number of patients who died before reaching hospital or who were discharged alive before 3 days from the intensive care unit was

Discussion

Our study shows that one etomidate bolus is not associated with a significant increase in morbidity or mortality compared with ketamine in patients admitted to the intensive care unit. The maximum SOFA score did not differ significantly between the two drugs in the subgroup of patients having sepsis or trauma. However, for the subgroup of septic patients (n=76), the small number of patients might account for the absence of significant difference. The mortality rate at day 28 in this subgroup

References (30)

  • M den Brinker et al.

    One single dose of etomidate negatively influences adrenocortical performance for at least 24 h in children with meningococcal sepsis

    Intensive Care Med

    (2008)
  • AN Hildreth et al.

    Adrenal suppression following a single dose of etomidate for rapid sequence induction: a prospective randomized study

    J Trauma

    (2008)
  • D Annane

    ICU physicians should abandon the use of etomidate!

    Intensive Care Med

    (2005)
  • PJ Zed et al.

    Intubating conditions and hemodynamic effects of etomidate for rapid sequence intubation in the emergency department: an observational cohort study

    Acad Emerg Med

    (2006)
  • JL Vincent et al.

    The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine

    Intensive Care Med

    (1996)
  • Cited by (403)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Members listed at end of paper

    View full text