Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease
In vitro antimicrobial activity of moxifloxacin compared to other quinolones against recent clinical bacterial isolates from hospitalized and community-based cancer patients

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-8893(03)00115-9Get rights and content

Abstract

The in vitro spectrum of moxifloxacin (a C-8-methoxyquinolone) was compared to that of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin against 924 recent clinical isolates from cancer patients. Moxifloxacin was more active than the comparator agents against Gram-positive pathogens, with potent activity against Aerococcus spp., Listeria monocytogenes, Micrococcus spp., Rhodococcus equi, and Stomatococcus mucilaginous, methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus spp., all beta hemolytic streptococci, viridans streptococci and Streptococcus pneumoniae. It also had good to moderate activity against Bacillus spp., Corynebacterium spp., Enterococcus faecalis, and methicillin-resistant staphylococci. Although ciprofloxacin was the most active agent tested against the Enterobacteriaceae, moxifloxacin inhibited the majority of these isolates at ≤2.0 μg/ml. Moxifloxacin was the least active of the three agents tested against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, but had significant activity against other non-fermentative Gram-negative bacilli including Acinetobacter spp., Flavobacterium spp., Pseudomonas spp. other than P. aeruginosa, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. The overall broad spectrum of moxifloxacin, and its availability for both oral and parenteral administration, warrants its evaluation for the prevention and treatment of infections in cancer patients.

Introduction

Supportive care of the cancer patient has improved substantially over the past two decades resulting in improved outcomes among patients who develop infections, particularly when neutropenic (Hughes et al., 2002). The quinolones have played an important role in the overall management of cancer patients, both as prophylactic agents, and as the Gram-negative component of combination regimens used for empiric therapy in febrile neutropenic patients The GIMEMA Infection Program 1991, For the International Antimicrobial Therapy Cooperative, Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer et alFor the International Antimicrobial Therapy Cooperative, Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer et al 1999, Hughes et al 2002, Rolston 1999. The spectrum of bacterial infection in patients with chemotherapy induced neutropenia undergoes periodic changes. Currently, Gram-positive organisms outnumber Gram-negative bacilli as the predominant pathogens at most cancer treatment centers, including ours Koll and Brown 1993, Rolston and Bodey 2000, Zinner 1999. Although they are less frequent, Gram-negative bacilli are associated with greater morbidity and mortality, making Gram-negative activity an essential component of agents used for prophylaxis or empiric therapy. One of the drawbacks for continuing use of older generation quinolones (norfloxacin, ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin) in cancer patients is their lack of adequate Gram-positive activity. Some of these agents have even been considered to promote the acquisition of viridans streptococci, staphylococci, streptococci, and enterococci, when used for prophylaxis (Elting et al., 1992). The in vitro activity of newer generation quinolones (trovafloxacin, gatifloxacin) against isolates from cancer patients has been evaluated and their potential for use in such patients, demonstrated Diekema et al 1999, Jones et al 1998, Rolston et al 1997, Rolston et al 1999a, Rolston et al 1999b. Serious trovafloxacin related hepatotoxicity however, resulted in the withdrawal of this agent from clinical usage. Based on our in vitro data on gatifloxacin we have initiated pilot studies of prophylaxis and empiric monotherapy in low-risk patients with this agent.

Our interest in moxifloxacin, a relatively new 8-methoxyquinolone was limited until recently, because this agent was initially developed only for oral usage. Now that oral and parenteral formulations of moxifloxacin have become available, we wished to determine its potential utility in cancer patients. Consequently, we determined its in vitro activity against recent clinical isolates obtained from patients being treated at our institution—an NCI designated Comprehensive Cancer Center. Ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin were chosen as comparator agents since these are the two quinolones used most frequently at cancer treatment centers including ours. Our results form the basis of this report.

Section snippets

Antimicrobial agents

All antimicrobial agents tested were obtained from their respective manufacturers in the form of standard powders for laboratory use, and were stored at −70°C until use.

Results

The susceptibility testing results are presented in Table 1.

Organism (No. Tested)Antimicrobial AgentMIC (μg/ml)
50%90%RANGE
viridans streptococci (20)moxifloxacin0.060.120.03–1.0
ciprofloxacin2.08.00.03–8.0
levofloxacin1.02.00.03–4.0
Gram-negative Isolates
Acinetobacter baumanii (20)moxifloxacin0.062.00.03–16.0
ciprofloxacin0.124.00.03–8.0
levofloxacin0.124.00.03–8.0
Acinetobacter lwoffi (20)moxifloxacin0.030.060.03–0.25
ciprofloxacin0.030.250.03–0.5
levofloxacin0.030.120.03–0.12
Alcaligenes xylosoxidans

Discussion

Gram-positive organisms cause documented infections more frequently than Gram-negative bacilli in neutropenic cancer patients Koll and Brown 1993, Zinner 1999. The most common Gram-positives include Staphylococcus spp., (both coagulase positive and—negative, and methicillin-susceptible and—resistant strains), Streptococcus spp. (including viridans streptococci and β-hemolytic organisms), and Enterococcus spp. (Zinner, 1999). Although VRE are isolated more often from neutropenic patients than

References (51)

  • J.C. Rodriguez et al.

    In vitro activity of moxifloxacin, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin and linezolid against Mycobacterium tuberculosis

    Int J Antimicrob Agents

    (2002)
  • A. Speciale et al.

    Minimal inhibitory concentrations and time-kill determination of moxifloxacin against aerobic and anaerobic isolates

    Int J Antimicrob Agents

    (2002)
  • M. Venditti et al.

    In vitro activity of moxifloxacin against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia blood isolates from patients with hematologic malignancies

    Clin Microb Infect

    (2001)
  • A.L. Barry et al.

    Antibacterial activity of moxifloxacin (Bay 12-8039) against aerobic clinical isolates and provisional criteria for disk susceptibility tests

    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis

    (1999)
  • A. Bauenfiend

    Comparison of the antibacterial activities of the quinolones Bay 12-8039, gatifloxacin (AM 1155), trovafloxacin, clinafloxacin, levofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin

    J Antimicrob Chemother

    (1997)
  • L.E. Bermudez et al.

    Activity of moxifloxacin by itself and in combination with ethambutol, rifabutin, and azithromycin in vitro and in vivo against Mycobacterium avium

    Antimicrob Agents Chemother

    (2001)
  • Blondeau, J. M., Hansen, G., Zhao, X., Drlica, K. (2001). Comparison of gatifloxacin (GA), Gemifloxacin (GM),...
  • G.O. Cardenosa et al.

    In vitro activity of moxifloxacin (BAY 12-8039) against respiratory tract pathogens from six Latin—American countries

    Chemotherapy

    (2000)
  • A. Dalhoff et al.

    In vitro activity of BAY 12-8039, a new 8-methoxyquinolone

    Chemotherapy

    (1996)
  • L.S. Elting et al.

    Septicemia and shock syndrome due to viridans streptococciA case-control study of predisposing factors

    Clin Infect Dis

    (1992)
  • R.J. Fass

    In vitro activity of Bay 12-8039, a new 8-methoxyquinolone

    Antimicrob Agents Chemother

    (1997)
  • R. Feld

    Vancomycin as part of initial empirical antibiotic therapy for febrile neutropenia in patients with cancerpros and cons

    Clin Infect Dis

    (1999)
  • D.N. Fish et al.

    Synergic activity of cephalosporins plus fluoroquinolones against Pseudomonas aeruginosa with resistance to one or both drugs

    J Antimicrob Chemother

    (2002)
  • D. Hardy et al.

    Comparative in vitro activities of ciprofloxacin, gemifloxacin, grepafloxacin, moxifloxacin, ofloxacin, sparfloxacin, trovafloxacin, and other antimicrobial agents against bloodstream isolates of Gram-positive cocci

    Antimicrob Agents Chemother

    (2000)
  • J.A.A. Hoogkamp-Korstanje et al.

    Comparative in vitro activity of moxifloxacin against Gram-positive clinical isolates

    J Antimicrob Agents

    (2000)
  • Cited by (29)

    • Other Coryneform Bacteria and Rhodococci

      2014, Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett's Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases
    • MISCELLANEOUS GRAM-POSITIVE BACILLI

      2009, Feigin and Cherry's Textbook of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Sixth Edition
    • ENTEROCOCCAL AND VIRIDANS STREPTOCOCCAL INFECTIONS

      2009, Feigin and Cherry's Textbook of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Sixth Edition
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text