ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Does introduction of new “easy to use” inhalational devices improve medical personnel's knowledge of their proper use?

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62371-XGet rights and content

Background

Lack of basic inhaler skills by medical personnel has been documented by numerous studies. Consequently, training of patients in correct inhalational technique suffers. Newer dry powder inhalers such as Turbuhaler (budesonide, Astra USA, Westborough, MA) and Diskus (salmeterol, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC) have some advantages over conventional metered-dose inhalers (MDIs) including easier technique of usage. They have been recently marketed with the hope of overcoming this problem.

Objective

To determine whether introduction of newer “easy to use” dry powder inhalers such as budesonide (Turbuhaler) and salmeterol (Diskus) would result in improvement in medical personnel's knowledge of their proper use.

Methods

In and around a community-based teaching hospital, interviews were conducted in March 2000 of 50 assorted randomly selected medical personnel. They included 10 respiratory therapists, 10 registered nurses, 10 medical residents, 10 primary care physicians, and 10 pharmacists. Objective evaluation was made of their skills demonstration and knowledge scores for usage of MDIs, budesonide, and salmeterol.

Results

Mean percentage demonstration scores of different medical personnel for all three devices taken together: respiratory therapist (81.6%), primary care physicians (77.7%), pharmacists (57.7%), registered nurses (54.4%), and medical residents (53.8%). Mean percentage demonstration scores of different inhalers for all medical personnel taken together: MDI (80.9%), salmeterol (64.2%), budesonide (49.9%). Mean percentage knowledge score of all three inhalational devices taken together for respiratory therapist was the best at 76.6%. Registered nurses performed the worst with a score of 52.0%. Mean percentage knowledge scores: MDI (78%), salmeterol (63.2%), and budesonide (52.4%). A repeated measures two-way analysis of variance demonstrated that differences in both demonstration and knowledge scores between inhaler types and between medical personnel were all highly statistically significant (P < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Demonstration skills and knowledge scores for use of both budedsonide and salmeterol were substantially lower than that for MDI for all medical personnel. Medical personnel responsible for teaching the correct use of inhalational devices are lacking in basic knowledge and user skills. This likely contributes to patient's poor technique when using these devices.

Cited by (52)

  • Overuse of short-acting beta-agonist bronchodilators in COPD during periods of clinical stability

    2016, Respiratory Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    Up to 80% of COPD patients do not use their inhalers correctly [3], a third of patients have never received instructions on inhaler use [20], and up to 69% of patients state that their provider has never observed them using their inhalers [21]. Providers may also not be familiar with how to use the inhaler devices [22]. Although 67% of the overusers in our sample had completed a pulmonary rehabilitation program, guidelines recommend ongoing, regular assessment of inhaler technique at clinic visits and on discharge from the hospital after an exacerbation [23].

  • A study investigating the community pharmacist knowledge about the appropriate use of inhaler, Eastern Region AlAhsa, Saudi Arabia

    2013, Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal
    Citation Excerpt :

    Similarly, those pharmacists working on chain pharmacies were found more knowledgeable than the pharmacists working on independent pharmacies. These findings comply with the international studies that report pharmacist’s deficient knowledge in explaining the patient about the correct inhaler use (Chopra et al., 2002; Basheti et al., 2005). Poor skills to use inhalers will decrease the confidence level among the community pharmacists and may result in the provision of incorrect instruction to the asthma patient.

  • Errors in the Use of Inhalers by Health Care Professionals: A Systematic Review

    2018, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
    Citation Excerpt :

    The general characteristics of the studies included in the review are shown in Table II. The 55 selected articles18-20,30-81 included data on 6,304 HCPs distributed as follows: pulmonologists and allergists, 377; other physicians (general practitioners, internal medicine specialists, and pediatricians), 2,290; medical residents, 763; medical students, 319; respiratory therapists, 50; nurses, 404; nursing students, 335; pharmacists, 1,402; pharmacy students, 327; and pharmacy technicians, 37. A total of 9,993 tests of the IT were performed.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text