Original articleEvaluation of a New Motion Sensor in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Section snippets
Study Design and Participants
Thirty patients with COPD (17 men) with no exacerbation episodes for at least 3 months were recruited to take part in this cross-sectional study. All participants had taken part recently or were currently enrolled in programs of respiratory physiotherapy at the University Hospital of the State University of Londrina, Brazil. The patient's latest assessment of lung function (<6mo) performed by hospital staff was used to confirm COPD diagnosis and classify degree of obstruction according to
Results
All of the 30 recruited patients successfully completed the protocols. Because there was no difference between first and second walk in both speeds concerning almost all variables of interest (P>.170), we standardized to use only the first walk of each speed in the analysis. Regarding the number of steps, walking distance, and walking intensity, there was a statistical difference between the first and second slow walking (P<.002), although not of a clinically important difference (1.5%, 2%, and
Discussion
The present study showed that, in patients with COPD, although the PW had a somewhat limited validity to estimate walking distance, walking intensity, and energy expenditure during the slow walk, it was highly valid to register the number of steps. Additionally, it was reproducible not only for step counting, but also in the estimation of walking distance and energy expenditure in the slow walk. During the fast walk, the PW was reproducible concerning all variables and highly valid to estimate
Conclusions
In patients with COPD, the PW is reproducible for most outcomes and highly valid for step counting during slow and fast walking and energy expenditure estimation during fast walking. The device's validity is more limited for energy expenditure estimation during slow walking and walking distance and intensity at both speeds. Furthermore, during the performance of a circuit of ADLs, the device significantly underestimates activity time but provides an acceptable estimation of energy expenditure
References (26)
- et al.
Physical activity is the strongest predictor of all-cause mortality in patients with COPD: a prospective cohort study
Chest
(2011) - et al.
Energy expenditure during daily activities as measured by two motion sensors in patients with COPD
Respir Med
(2011) - et al.
Step counting and energy expenditure estimation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and healthy elderly: accuracy of 2 motion sensors
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(2010) - et al.
Commercially available pedometers: considerations for accurate step counting
Prev Med
(2004) - et al.
Gait patterns during different walking conditions in older adults with and without knee osteoarthritis−results from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging
Gait Posture
(2011) - et al.
Characteristics of physical activities in daily life in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
(2005) - et al.
Profile of the level of physical activity in the daily lives of patients with COPD in Brazil
J Bras Pneumol
(2009) - et al.
Potential consequences for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients who do not get the recommended minimum daily amount of physical activity
J Bras Pneumol
(2006) - et al.
Does the BODE index reflect the level of physical activity in daily life in patients with COPD?
Rev Bras Fisioter
(2011) - et al.
Quantifying physical activity in daily life with questionnaires and motion sensors in COPD
Eur Respir J
(2006)
Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: GOLD executive summary
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
Activity monitoring and energy expenditure in COPD patients: a validation study
COPD
Measurement properties of the SenseWear armband in adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Thorax
Cited by (17)
Measuring intensity during free-living physical activities in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic literature review
2022, Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation MedicineCitation Excerpt :The most frequently used outcomes, outcome measures and instruments to assess single free-living PA-related intensity were dyspnoea with the modified Borg scale; cardiac function via HR, measured with HR monitors; and pulmonary gas exchange, especially VO2, measured with portable gas analysers. In total, 32 studies referred to absolute intensity [20, 22-28, 30, 31, 33, 34, 36-38, 40-47, 49, 51, 52, 56, 57, 60-63] and 32 to relative intensity [20, 22-26, 29-36, 39, 40, 42, 46-48, 50-55, 57, 58, 60-62]. From the latest studies, 2 estimated maximum intensity using equations [47, 54].
Effects of exercise training in water and on land in patients with COPD: a randomised clinical trial
2018, Physiotherapy (United Kingdom)Validation of the Fitbit One activity monitor device during treadmill walking
2014, Journal of Science and Medicine in SportCitation Excerpt :Concordance correlation coefficients were <0.05, indicating poor agreement and inspection of the Bland and Altman plots indicated worse agreement at faster walking speeds. Computing the product of step length and step count is a common method of calculating distance travelled and is used by other activity monitors.15 The distance measure of the Fitbit One activity monitors uses a default step length based on height and gender, and this may explain the inaccurate distance outputs.
Incremental shuttle walking test: A reproducible and valid test to evaluate exercise tolerance in adults with noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis
2014, Archives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationCitation Excerpt :Future studies correlating the distance walked with Vo2peak measured on the ISWT should substantiate this test as an objective measure of the cardiopulmonary capacity in non-CF bronchiectasis patients. In a recent validation study of the Power Walker accelerometer, patients wore it attached to the waist, in the hemiclavicular line30; because this validation study was published after our study had already begun, we followed the recommendations of the manufacturer. Therefore, we cannot affirm that the accelerometer presents the same performance when it is worn in a pocket.
Validity and Reliability of a Piezoelectric Pedometer for Measuring Physical Activity in Children
2020, Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science
Supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)/Brazil (grant no. 302061/2010-0); Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)/Brazil (grant nos. 05768419942 and 00847546993); and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)/Brazil (grant no. 2010/03223-2).
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the authors or on any organization with which the authors are associated.
Reprints are not available from the author.
In-press corrected proof published online on Jul 31, 2012, at www.archives-pmr.org.