Asthma and lower airway disease
Relating small airways to asthma control by using impulse oscillometry in children

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2011.11.002Get rights and content

Background

Previous reports suggest that the peripheral airways are associated with asthma control. Patient history, although subjective, is used largely to assess asthma control in children because spirometric results are many times normal values. Impulse oscillometry (IOS) is an objective and noninvasive measurement of lung function that has the potential to examine independently both small- and large-airway obstruction.

Objective

We sought to determine the utility of IOS in assessing asthma control in children.

Methods

Asthmatic and healthy children (6-17 years) were enrolled in the study. Spirometric and IOS (resistance of the respiratory system at 5 Hz [R5] and 20 Hz [R20], reactance of the respiratory system at 5 Hz [X5], resonant frequency of reactance [Fres], and area under the reactance curve between 5 Hz and Fres [reactance area {AX}]) values were collected in triplicate before and after a bronchodilator was administered. The physicians were blinded to the IOS measurements and assessed asthma control using American Thoracic Society guidelines.

Results

Small-airway IOS measurements, including the difference of R5 and R20 [R5-20], X5, Fres, and AX, of children with uncontrolled asthma (n = 44) were significantly different from those of children with controlled asthma (n = 57) and healthy children (n = 14), especially before the administration of a bronchodilator. However, there was no difference in large-airway IOS values (R20). No differences were found between children with controlled asthma and healthy children in any of the end points. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed cut points for baseline R5-20 (1.5 cm H2O · L−1 · s) and AX (9.5 cm H2O · L−1) that effectively discriminated controlled versus uncontrolled asthma (area under the curve, 0.86 and 0.84) and correctly classified more than 80% of the population.

Conclusion

Uncontrolled asthma is associated with small-airways dysfunction, and IOS might be a reliable and noninvasive method to assess asthma control in children.

Section snippets

Study participants

Children aged 6 to 17 years who were being actively treated for asthma on the Children’s Hospital of Orange County Breathmobile were enrolled in the study. The Breathmobile is a mobile asthma clinic that travels to schools, community clinics, and child development centers in low-income neighborhoods throughout Orange County, California, and provides comprehensive asthma care to children who have or are at risk for asthma. Children were included in the study if they were 6 to 17 years of age and

Study sample

Fourteen healthy control subjects and 107 asthmatic subjects were consented for the study. One hundred one (94%) of the asthmatic subjects were able to perform acceptable IOS maneuvers; 6 patients were excluded from the study because their IOS measurements had coherence lower than the recommended values. On the basis of a physician’s assessment, 57 (56%) of the 101 asthmatic subjects had controlled asthma and 44 (44%) had uncontrolled asthma. The demographics of the 3 asthma groups are

Discussion

Our study compared IOS indices of small- and large-airway resistance and reactance in children with controlled and uncontrolled asthma and established cut points to identify uncontrolled asthma. Prebronchodilator (or baseline) values for small-airway resistance (R5-R20) and reactance (AX) performed best, resulting in sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values that all exceeded 0.80. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the

References (49)

  • S. Hozawa et al.

    Comparison of budesonide/formoterol Turbuhaler with fluticasone/salmeterol Diskus for treatment effects on small airway impairment and airway inflammation in patients with asthma

    Pulm Pharmacol Ther

    (2011)
  • J. Frei et al.

    Impulse oscillometry: reference values in children 100 to 150 cm in height and 3 to 10 years of age

    Chest

    (2005)
  • E.D. Bateman et al.

    Global strategy for asthma management and prevention: GINA executive summary

    Eur Respir J

    (2008)
  • W.D. Carroll et al.

    Parent misperception of control in childhood/adolescent asthma: The room to breathe survey

    Eur Respir J

    (2011)
  • K.J. Davis et al.

    Is Johnny wheezing? Parent-child agreement in the Childhood Asthma in America survey

    Pediatr Allergy Immunol

    (2011)
  • J.D. Spahn et al.

    Is forced expiratory volume in one second the best measure of severity in childhood asthma?

    Am J Respir Crit Care Med

    (2004)
  • E.G. Meraz et al.

    Analysis of impulse oscillometric measures of lung function and respiratory system model parameters in small airway-impaired and healthy children over a 2-year period

    Biomed Eng Online

    (2011)
  • T. Takeda et al.

    Relationship between small airway function and health status, dyspnea and disease control in asthma

    Respiration

    (2010)
  • J. Cohen et al.

    Ciclesonide improves measures of small airway involvement in asthma

    Eur Respir J

    (2008)
  • I. Annesi et al.

    Relationship of upper airways disorders to FEV1 and bronchial hyperresponsiveness in an epidemiological study

    Eur Respir J

    (1992)
  • G.L. Marseglia et al.

    Role of forced expiratory flow at 25-75% as an early marker of small airways impairment in subjects with allergic rhinitis

    Allergy Asthma Proc

    (2007)
  • M. Studnicka et al.

    Determinants of reproducibility of lung function tests in children aged 7 to 10 years

    Pediatr Pulmonol

    (1998)
  • G.L. Larsen et al.

    Impulse oscillometry versus spirometry in a long-term study of controller therapy for pediatric asthma

    J Allergy Clin Immunol

    (2009)
  • T.W. Song et al.

    Utility of impulse oscillometry in young children with asthma

    Pediatr Allergy Immunol

    (2008)
  • Cited by (183)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported by National Institutes of Health grant HL070645.

    Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest.

    View full text