Original contributionUlnar artery versus radial artery approach for arterial cannulation: a prospective, comparative study
Introduction
Arterial cannulation is a common intervention for frequent arterial blood gas measurements and continuous blood pressure monitoring in the operating room and intensive care unit. Various factors determine the artery used preferentially, including accessibility, ease of placement, presence of collateral flow, and risk of infection and serious embolic phenomena [1]. Although the radial, femoral, dorsalis pedis, brachial, ulnar, and axillary arteries are all accessible sites for cannulation, the literature focuses much more on cannulation of the radial artery. Many anesthesiologists consider radial artery cannulation as the standard technique for hemodynamic monitoring among the upper extremity arteries [2]. There is a tendency to choose the ulnar artery if the radial artery is unsuitable for cannulation [3]. The radial artery is the dominant vessel of the hand [4]. Although the ulnar artery has been mentioned as an alternative site for cannulation, to date, little data exist as to its efficacy and complications. Therefore, this study compared the feasibility, success/fail rate, and safety of the ulnar and radial approaches for arterial cannulation.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
After obtaining the approval of the Ondokuz Mayis University Hospital's local ethics committee and written, informed consent, 100 ASA physical status I, II, and III patients aged 18 to 65 years, undergoing general anesthesia and requiring arterial cannulation, were enrolled in the study. Exclusion criteria included diabetes mellitus, an abnormal Allen test, Raynaud syndrome, and other vascular diseases. For patients who were finally selected for the study, a balanced randomization method, which
Results
Demographic data and duration of cannulation of the study groups are summarized in Table 1. There was no difference between groups in age, gender distribution, ASA physical status, or BMI (P > 0.05).
Evaluation of radial arterial pulses rated 83% as strong, 15% as weak, and 2% as absent (Table 2). Examination of ulnar arterial pulses showed that 73% were strong, 26% weak, and 1% absent. The success rates of cannulation for the ulnar and radial arteries were 82% and 90%, respectively (P > 0.05).
Discussion
The results of this study suggest that although the overall success rate of cannulation in the ulnar group (82%) was lower than that of the radial group (90%), the success rate of ulnar cannulation in patients with a strong pulse was extremely high (100%), and complication rates of cannulations were not statistically different in the ulnar or radial artery cannulation groups.
Anatomical dissections and radionucleotide flow studies of the ulnar and radial arteries at the wrist have shown that the
Acknowledgment
The authors thank Prof. Dr. YS Baris for his critical review of this manuscript.
References (25)
- et al.
The anaesthesiologist in the intensive care unit
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol
(2003) - et al.
Radial artery cannulation in 1,000 patients: precautions and complications
J Hand Surg
(1977) - et al.
Alternative arterial catheterization site using the ulnar artery in critically ill pediatric patients
Pediatr Crit Care Med
(2002) - et al.
Vascular dominance in the forearm
Plast Reconstr Surg
(2003) - et al.
Complications of percutaneous radial-artery cannulation: an objective prospective study in man
Anesthesiology
(1973) - et al.
Ulnar artery catheterization with occlusion of corresponding radial artery
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
(2004) - et al.
Comparison of ulnar and radial arterial blood-flow at the wrist
J Hand Surg
(1995) Arteriography of the hand and wrist
Hand Clin
(1991)- et al.
Radial artery cannulation. A prospective study in patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery
Br J Anaesth
(1980)