Elsevier

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volume 24, Issue 10, December 2006, Pages 1325-1332
Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Original contribution
Quantitative analysis of the velocity and synchronicity of diaphragmatic motion: dynamic MRI in different postures

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2006.08.009Get rights and content

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to assess the relationship between right and left hemidiaphragmatic motions during breathing in normal subjects and to investigate alterations in lung motion with changes in posture, using dynamic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Imaging was conducted with a 1.5-T MR scanner using fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition with a torso coil. Eight healthy subjects were instructed to breathe from end-inspiration to end-expiration as slowly and as deeply as possible. Imaging and breathing were started together to afford sequential images on the coronal plane. Imaging sequences were performed in supine, prone, left lateral decubitus and right lateral decubitus postures. The component of movement of the most cephalic point in the cephalocaudal axis was measured, and the diaphragmatic excursion (maximum hemidiaphragmatic displacement), synchrony and velocity of the right and left hemidiaphragmatic motions were calculated during the expiratory phase and the inspiratory phase, respectively. Excursion was greater in the right hemidiaphragm in most postures, except the left lateral decubitus. In supine and prone postures, both hemidiaphragms moved synchronously in both inspiratory and expiratory phases. In both lateral decubitus postures, the hemidiaphragms moved asynchronously with different velocities in the expiratory phase but with the same velocities in the inspiratory phase. The method described here allowed the assessment of diaphragmatic motions. Motions in the right and left hemidiaphragms changed with posture. In addition, diaphragmatic motion differed between expiratory and inspiratory phases. This study suggests the further potential of dynamic MR imaging for the evaluation of pulmonary functions or deficiencies.

Introduction

Lung motion during respiration has been investigated using several imaging modalities. Investigators initially used fluoroscopy [1], [2], [3] and ultrasound [4], [5], [6]. In most of these studies, the displacements and excursions of the diaphragm or the chest wall were measured on images obtained at two different phases of respiration: end-inspiration and end-expiration. In normal subjects, Wade [1] and Alexander [2] reported that diaphragmatic excursion was greater on the left side, whereas Simon et al. [3] and Houston et al. [5] reported that it was greater on the right side.

Recently, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been used for the assessment of lung motion because of its ability to provide good tissue contrast [7], [8], [9], [10]. MRI is not affected by distortion due to magnification or parallax characteristic of fluoroscopic techniques, thus providing more precise and reproducible measurements in different subjects or examinations [9]. Furthermore, MRI allows one to perform a dynamic study during breathing, where a series of images was obtained at high temporal resolution during respiration [9], [11], [12], [13]. These previous studies suggest that MRI is more attractive than X-ray computed tomography due to its noninvasive nature and its usefulness for the assessment of abnormal lung motions accompanying several diseases such as diaphragmatic paralysis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]. In most of those studies, however, only total excursion was quantified, and they reported conflicting conclusions regarding diaphragmatic differences in hemidiaphragmatic excursion on the right and left sides. Although dynamic MRI was qualitative, Gierada et al. [9] described that it could reveal minor asynchrony in right and left hemidiaphragmatic motions. This has highlighted the need to establish a quantitative method for the assessment of a more detailed dynamic diaphragmatic motion (e.g., synchrony between right and left, or the velocity of diaphragmatic motion in dynamic MRI).

In previous reports that described dynamic MRI, each diaphragm level was measured during breathing, and time–diaphragmatic length curves were generated [12], [16]. However, the curves were used mainly to detect maximum expiration/inspiration and to compare the highs of right and left diaphragms at each point; therefore, diaphragmatic motion was analyzed statically. To evaluate detailed diaphragmatic motion, we should deal with it as a continuous dynamic motion, and a new analysis is necessary to perform this evaluation.

Pulmonary ventilation is heterogeneous and location-dependent in the lungs [17], [18], [19], [20], being greater in the dependent lung where gravity is thought to play an important role [21], [22], [23]. However, there have been few studies of lung motion in different postures. Froese and Bryan [24], using fluoroscopy, reported diaphragmatic displacements in the supine and left lateral decubitus postures, but there have been no studies assessing posture-dependent lung motion dynamically.

Here we propose new quantitative analysis methods to assess dynamic diaphragmatic motion in dynamic MRI studies. Using such analyses, we quantified the total excursion, right–left synchrony and velocity of the right and left hemidiaphragmatic motions on the coronal plane during breathing. Furthermore, we investigated whether those parameters were altered by different postures: supine, prone, right lateral decubitus and left lateral decubitus.

Section snippets

Subjects

The subjects were eight healthy men (age: mean=32.3 years; range=23–42 years). This study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of our institution, and informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

MRI scanning

Imaging was conducted with a 1.5-T body MR scanner (Signa Twinspeed; General Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI) with a torso coil. First, the entire thorax was scanned on the coronal plane as scout images, using multislice fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition

Results

Fig. 2 shows a typical series of images and the time–displacement curves obtained during breathing in the supine (A) and right lateral decubitus (B) postures in a 27-year-old subject. The white triangle and the open square on each image show the highest point of the right and left hemidiaphragms. In the first supine image (end-inspiration; Fig. 2A(a)), the diaphragm was located at the most caudal level, and the right and left hemidiaphragms were at the same level. Both started to move toward

Discussion

Using new quantitative analysis methods applied to dynamic MRI data, we compared hemidiaphragmatic motion in the right and left sides during breathing in four different postures. In the supine and prone postures, both hemidiaphragms behaved synchronously in both respiratory phases. By contrast, in the lateral decubitus posture, the hemidiaphragms behaved asynchronously with different velocities in the expiratory phase but with the same velocities in the inspiratory phase. The parameters we

References (29)

  • O. Wade

    Movements of the thoracic cage and diaphragm in respiration

    J Physiol

    (1954)
  • C. Alexander

    Diaphragm movements and the diagnosis of diaphragmatic paralysis

    Clin Radiol

    (1966)
  • G. Simon et al.

    Some radiological observations on the range of movement of the diaphragm

    Clin Radiol

    (1969)
  • R.S. Harris et al.

    Normal ventilatory movement of the right hemidiaphragm studied by ultrasonography and pneumotachography

    Radiology

    (1983)
  • J.G. Houston et al.

    Technical report: quantitative assessment of diaphragmatic movement — a reproducible method using ultrasound

    Clin Radiol

    (1992)
  • J. Ueki et al.

    In vivo assessment of diaphragm contraction by ultrasound in normal subjects

    Thorax

    (1995)
  • M. Paiva et al.

    Mechanical implications of in vivo human diaphragm shape

    J Appl Physiol

    (1992)
  • A.P. Gauthier et al.

    Three-dimensional reconstruction of the in vivo human diaphragm shape at different lung volumes

    J Appl Physiol

    (1994)
  • D.S. Gierada et al.

    Diaphragmatic motion: fast gradient-recalled-echo MR imaging in healthy subjects

    Radiology

    (1995)
  • P. Cluzel et al.

    Diaphragm and chest wall: assessment of the inspiratory pump with MR imaging — preliminary observations

    Radiology

    (2000)
  • T. Iwasawa et al.

    Magnetic resonance analysis of abnormal diaphragmatic motion in patients with emphysema

    Eur Respir J

    (2002)
  • K. Suga et al.

    Impaired respiratory mechanics in pulmonary emphysema: evaluation with dynamic breathing MRI

    J Magn Reson Imaging

    (1999)
  • O. Unal et al.

    Evaluation of diaphragmatic movement with MR fluoroscopy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

    Clin Imaging

    (2000)
  • R. Urhahn et al.

    A study of the diaphragmatic mobility in an infant using ultrafast serial Snapshot-FLASH-MRT

    Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr

    (1991)
  • Cited by (58)

    • ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Imaging of Mediastinal Masses

      2021, Journal of the American College of Radiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Cross-sectional imaging by MRI remains superior to CT for detection of invasion of the mass across tissue planes, including the chest wall and diaphragm, and involvement of neurovascular structures, secondary to its higher soft tissue contrast [48-52]. As a supplement to static assessment of tissue plane transgression, dynamic MRI [45-48] during free-breathing or cinematic cardiac gating can be performed to assess movement of the mass relative to adjacent structures, to confirm or exclude adherence of the mass to adjacent structures, and to observe diaphragmatic motion in real time [80-84]; paradoxical motion or lack of motion can indicate phrenic nerve involvement by the mediastinal mass, without the need to perform a subsequent fluoroscopic sniff test. Transthoracic US is unlikely to offer additional information regarding mediastinal mass characterization beyond that of MRI.

    • Time-resolved quantitative evaluation of diaphragmatic motion during forced breathing in a health screening cohort in a standing position: Dynamic chest phrenicography

      2019, European Journal of Radiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Dysfunction of the diaphragm is common and can be caused by trauma, surgery, cervical cord or phrenic nerve damage, inflammation and mediastinal mass, and various other reasons [1]. Functional analysis and quantification of motion for diaphragms have been performed using many imaging modalities, including conventional chest radiography [2–4], fluoroscopy [5–7], ultrasonography (US) [8–12], computed tomography (CT) [13], and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [14–16]. However, while understanding diaphragm kinetics is useful for monitoring, treatment, and management of respiratory diseases with diaphragm dysfunction the diaphragm’s function and contribution to respiratory difficulties have not been fully investigated.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text