Original contributionQuantitative analysis of the velocity and synchronicity of diaphragmatic motion: dynamic MRI in different postures
Introduction
Lung motion during respiration has been investigated using several imaging modalities. Investigators initially used fluoroscopy [1], [2], [3] and ultrasound [4], [5], [6]. In most of these studies, the displacements and excursions of the diaphragm or the chest wall were measured on images obtained at two different phases of respiration: end-inspiration and end-expiration. In normal subjects, Wade [1] and Alexander [2] reported that diaphragmatic excursion was greater on the left side, whereas Simon et al. [3] and Houston et al. [5] reported that it was greater on the right side.
Recently, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been used for the assessment of lung motion because of its ability to provide good tissue contrast [7], [8], [9], [10]. MRI is not affected by distortion due to magnification or parallax characteristic of fluoroscopic techniques, thus providing more precise and reproducible measurements in different subjects or examinations [9]. Furthermore, MRI allows one to perform a dynamic study during breathing, where a series of images was obtained at high temporal resolution during respiration [9], [11], [12], [13]. These previous studies suggest that MRI is more attractive than X-ray computed tomography due to its noninvasive nature and its usefulness for the assessment of abnormal lung motions accompanying several diseases such as diaphragmatic paralysis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]. In most of those studies, however, only total excursion was quantified, and they reported conflicting conclusions regarding diaphragmatic differences in hemidiaphragmatic excursion on the right and left sides. Although dynamic MRI was qualitative, Gierada et al. [9] described that it could reveal minor asynchrony in right and left hemidiaphragmatic motions. This has highlighted the need to establish a quantitative method for the assessment of a more detailed dynamic diaphragmatic motion (e.g., synchrony between right and left, or the velocity of diaphragmatic motion in dynamic MRI).
In previous reports that described dynamic MRI, each diaphragm level was measured during breathing, and time–diaphragmatic length curves were generated [12], [16]. However, the curves were used mainly to detect maximum expiration/inspiration and to compare the highs of right and left diaphragms at each point; therefore, diaphragmatic motion was analyzed statically. To evaluate detailed diaphragmatic motion, we should deal with it as a continuous dynamic motion, and a new analysis is necessary to perform this evaluation.
Pulmonary ventilation is heterogeneous and location-dependent in the lungs [17], [18], [19], [20], being greater in the dependent lung where gravity is thought to play an important role [21], [22], [23]. However, there have been few studies of lung motion in different postures. Froese and Bryan [24], using fluoroscopy, reported diaphragmatic displacements in the supine and left lateral decubitus postures, but there have been no studies assessing posture-dependent lung motion dynamically.
Here we propose new quantitative analysis methods to assess dynamic diaphragmatic motion in dynamic MRI studies. Using such analyses, we quantified the total excursion, right–left synchrony and velocity of the right and left hemidiaphragmatic motions on the coronal plane during breathing. Furthermore, we investigated whether those parameters were altered by different postures: supine, prone, right lateral decubitus and left lateral decubitus.
Section snippets
Subjects
The subjects were eight healthy men (age: mean=32.3 years; range=23–42 years). This study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of our institution, and informed consent was obtained from all subjects.
MRI scanning
Imaging was conducted with a 1.5-T body MR scanner (Signa Twinspeed; General Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI) with a torso coil. First, the entire thorax was scanned on the coronal plane as scout images, using multislice fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition
Results
Fig. 2 shows a typical series of images and the time–displacement curves obtained during breathing in the supine (A) and right lateral decubitus (B) postures in a 27-year-old subject. The white triangle and the open square on each image show the highest point of the right and left hemidiaphragms. In the first supine image (end-inspiration; Fig. 2A(a)), the diaphragm was located at the most caudal level, and the right and left hemidiaphragms were at the same level. Both started to move toward
Discussion
Using new quantitative analysis methods applied to dynamic MRI data, we compared hemidiaphragmatic motion in the right and left sides during breathing in four different postures. In the supine and prone postures, both hemidiaphragms behaved synchronously in both respiratory phases. By contrast, in the lateral decubitus posture, the hemidiaphragms behaved asynchronously with different velocities in the expiratory phase but with the same velocities in the inspiratory phase. The parameters we
References (29)
Movements of the thoracic cage and diaphragm in respiration
J Physiol
(1954)Diaphragm movements and the diagnosis of diaphragmatic paralysis
Clin Radiol
(1966)- et al.
Some radiological observations on the range of movement of the diaphragm
Clin Radiol
(1969) - et al.
Normal ventilatory movement of the right hemidiaphragm studied by ultrasonography and pneumotachography
Radiology
(1983) - et al.
Technical report: quantitative assessment of diaphragmatic movement — a reproducible method using ultrasound
Clin Radiol
(1992) - et al.
In vivo assessment of diaphragm contraction by ultrasound in normal subjects
Thorax
(1995) - et al.
Mechanical implications of in vivo human diaphragm shape
J Appl Physiol
(1992) - et al.
Three-dimensional reconstruction of the in vivo human diaphragm shape at different lung volumes
J Appl Physiol
(1994) - et al.
Diaphragmatic motion: fast gradient-recalled-echo MR imaging in healthy subjects
Radiology
(1995) - et al.
Diaphragm and chest wall: assessment of the inspiratory pump with MR imaging — preliminary observations
Radiology
(2000)
Magnetic resonance analysis of abnormal diaphragmatic motion in patients with emphysema
Eur Respir J
Impaired respiratory mechanics in pulmonary emphysema: evaluation with dynamic breathing MRI
J Magn Reson Imaging
Evaluation of diaphragmatic movement with MR fluoroscopy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Clin Imaging
A study of the diaphragmatic mobility in an infant using ultrafast serial Snapshot-FLASH-MRT
Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr
Cited by (58)
ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Imaging of Mediastinal Masses
2021, Journal of the American College of RadiologyCitation Excerpt :Cross-sectional imaging by MRI remains superior to CT for detection of invasion of the mass across tissue planes, including the chest wall and diaphragm, and involvement of neurovascular structures, secondary to its higher soft tissue contrast [48-52]. As a supplement to static assessment of tissue plane transgression, dynamic MRI [45-48] during free-breathing or cinematic cardiac gating can be performed to assess movement of the mass relative to adjacent structures, to confirm or exclude adherence of the mass to adjacent structures, and to observe diaphragmatic motion in real time [80-84]; paradoxical motion or lack of motion can indicate phrenic nerve involvement by the mediastinal mass, without the need to perform a subsequent fluoroscopic sniff test. Transthoracic US is unlikely to offer additional information regarding mediastinal mass characterization beyond that of MRI.
Diaphragmatic excursion: Quantitative measure to assess adequacy of expiratory phase CT chest images
2021, European Journal of RadiologyTime-resolved quantitative evaluation of diaphragmatic motion during forced breathing in a health screening cohort in a standing position: Dynamic chest phrenicography
2019, European Journal of RadiologyCitation Excerpt :Dysfunction of the diaphragm is common and can be caused by trauma, surgery, cervical cord or phrenic nerve damage, inflammation and mediastinal mass, and various other reasons [1]. Functional analysis and quantification of motion for diaphragms have been performed using many imaging modalities, including conventional chest radiography [2–4], fluoroscopy [5–7], ultrasonography (US) [8–12], computed tomography (CT) [13], and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [14–16]. However, while understanding diaphragm kinetics is useful for monitoring, treatment, and management of respiratory diseases with diaphragm dysfunction the diaphragm’s function and contribution to respiratory difficulties have not been fully investigated.
ACR Appropriateness Criteria <sup>®</sup> Chronic Dyspnea-Noncardiovascular Origin
2018, Journal of the American College of RadiologyAssessing Diaphragm Function in Chest Wall and Neuromuscular Diseases
2018, Clinics in Chest Medicine