Skip to main content
Log in

Performance of a Digital PCO2/SpO2 Ear Sensor

  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective.For determining the adequacy of ventilation, conventional pulse oximetry should be amended by PaCO2 (= arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure). This study investigates the precision of carbon dioxide measurements of the first digitalear-clip sensor providing continuous non-invasive monitoring of PaCO2, SpO2 (= functional arterial oxygen saturation as estimated with a pulse oximeter) and pulse rate and compares it to two conventional analog oximeters. Methods.30 hypoxemia episodes in 6 adult volunteers were investigated in a standardized protocol. Equipment: Masimo analog finger sensor, Nellcor analog ear sensor, SenTec digital ear sensor. Results.The difference between PCO2 data (= PaCO2 estimated from the measured PcCO2 based on an algorithm by Severinghaus) (PcCO2 = cutaneous carbon dioxide pressure) and the PaCO2 is clinically unimportant. Therefore, we suggest, the two methods of estimating patient's carbon dioxide status can be used interchangeably. Conclusions.Combined digital SpO2/PcCO2 ear sensors are very promising to allow for a fast and reliable monitoring of patient's oxygenation, hyper-/hypocapnia and ventilation with one single non-invasive probe. Optimal primary signal processing – amplification and digitalisation within the probe – allow for fast and reliable downstream signal processing algorithms. The resulting short SpO2 response times give the medical staff more time to take appropriate actions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Severinghaus JW. The current status of transcutaneous blood gas analysis and monitoring. Blood Gas News 1998; 7(2): 4–9

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bohnhorst B, Peter CS, Poets, CF. Pulse oximeters' reliability in detecting hypoxemia and bradycardia: comparison between a conventional and two new generation oximeters. Crit Care Med 2000; 28: 1565–1568

    Google Scholar 

  3. Heuss LT, Schnieper P, Chhajed PN, Beglinger C. Safety monitoring during sedation with a smart clip at the ear lobe. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology: submitted 2004

  4. Severinghaus JW, Naifeh KH. Accuracy of response of six pulse oximeters to profound hypoxia. Anesthesiology 1987; 67(4): 551–558

    Google Scholar 

  5. Reynolds LM, Nicolson SC, Steven JM, Escobar A, McGonigle ME, Jobes DR. Infuence of sensor site location on pulse oximetry kinetics in children. Anesth Analg 1993; 76(4): 751–754

    Google Scholar 

  6. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). Standard speci¢cation for alarm signals in medical equipment. West Conshohocken, PA. ASTM 1999; F1463–F1493

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hayoz J, Rohling R, Tschupp A.World's first combined digital pulse oximetry and carbon dioxide tension ear sensor. ISIAPO 2001; Meeting Abstract A6

  8. Hamber EA, Bailey PL, James SW, Wells DT, Lu JK, Pace NL. Delays in the detection of hypoxemia due to site of pulse oximetry probe placement. J Clin Anesth 1999; 11: 113–118

    Google Scholar 

  9. Villanueva R, Bell C, Kain ZN, Colingo KA. Effect of peripheral perfusion on accuracy of pulse oximetry in children. J Clin Anesth 1999; 11(4): 317–322

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kirkham FJ, Hewes DK, Prengler M, Wade A, Lane R, Evans JP. Nocturnal hypoxaemia and central-nervoussystem events in sickle-cell disease. Lancet 2001; 357(9269): 1656–1659

    Google Scholar 

  11. Clark JS, Votteri B, Ariagno RL, Cheung P, Eichhorn JH, Fallat RJ, Lee SE, Newth CJ, Rotman H, Sue DY. Noninvasive assessment of blood gases. Am Rev Respir Dis 1992; 145(1): 220–232

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kocher, S., Rohling, R. & Tschupp, A. Performance of a Digital PCO2/SpO2 Ear Sensor. J Clin Monit Comput 18, 75–79 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOCM.0000032693.78829.42

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOCM.0000032693.78829.42

Navigation