Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Reliability of Conventional and New Pulse Oximetry in Neonatal Patients

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Pulse oximetry is widely used in the NICU, but clinicians often distrust the displayed values during patient motion, i.e., questionable oxygen saturation (SpO2) and pulse rate (PR) values. Masimo Corporation (Irvine, CA) has developed pulse oximetry with claims of resistance to sources of interference. To test this premise, we compared the performance of the Masimo SET pulse oximeter to a conventional device, Nellcor N-200, and then with three other new-generation pulse oximeters, Nellcor N-395, Novametrix MARS, and Philips Viridia 24C.

STUDY DESIGN: We studied 26 nonsedated NICU infants who were on supplemental oxygen and/or mechanical ventilation. ECG heart rate (HR) from a bedside monitor and SpO2 and PR from the two pulse oximeters were captured by a PC for a total of 156 hours. The ECG HR and pulse oximeter spectral waveform were analyzed at alarms for hypoxemia (SpO2≤85%) and/or bradycardia (HR≤80 bpm). We then compared the performance of the Masimo SET to three other new-generation pulse oximeters, Agilent Viridia 24C, Nellcor N-395, and Novametrix MARS, in a similar population of seven infants for a total of 28 hours. We added to the test criteria the ability of the various pulse oximeters to track acute changes in HR.

RESULTS: Compared with Nellcor, Masimo SET had 86% fewer false alarms, which also were shorter in duration, resulting in 92% less total alarm time. Masimo SET also identified nearly all bradycardias versus 14% for the Nellcor. Compared with the new-generation pulse oximeters, false desaturations, data drop-outs, and false bradycardias were lowest for Masimo SET, as was the capture of true desaturations and bradycardias. Notably, the new-generation devices differed greatly in their ability to detect changes in HR (i.e., the frequency of frozen PR during times of ECG HR change was 0, 6, 11, and 46 for Masimo, Nellcor, Philips, and Novametrix, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS: Masimo SET pulse oximetry recorded markedly fewer false SpO2 and PR alarms and identified more true hypoxic and bradycardic events than either conventional or other new-generation pulse oximeters. Masimo SET also most closely reflected the ECG rate irrespective of accelerations or decelerations in HR.

SPECULATION: Routine use of Masimo SET pulse oximetry in the NICU could improve clinician confidence in the parameter leading to more judicious titration of oxygen with possible reductions in hypoxic (e.g., pulmonary hypertension) and hyperoxic (e.g., retinopathy of prematurity) pathology. Additionally, a more trustworthy technology should equate with fewer confirmatory arterial blood gas analyses (less blood loss), and faster weaning from the mechanical ventilation (less chronic lung disease).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hay WW Jr, Brockway J, Eyzaguirre M . Neonatal pulse oximetry: accuracy and reliability Pediatrics 1989; 83: 717–22

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pologe JA . Pulse oximetry: technical aspects of machine design Int Anesthesiol Clin 1987; 25: 137–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Swedlow DB, Irving SM . Monitoring and patient safety In: Blitt CD, editor Monitoring in Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine 2nd ed New York: Churchill Livingstone 1990; p 45–6

    Google Scholar 

  4. Industry News . Survey indicates problems in oximetry readings RT\J Respir Care Pract 1995; 3: 3 14

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goldman JM, Petterson MT, Kopotic RJ, Barker SJ . Masimo signal extraction pulse oximetry J Clin Monit 2000; 16: 7 475–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Petterson MT, Novak JJ, Kopotic RJ, Goldman JM . A silver standard for corroboration of SpO2 values during motion Anesth Analg 2002; 94: Suppl 1 S106 A12

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lawless ST . Crying wolf: false alarms in a pediatric intensive care unit Crit Care Med 1994; 22: 981–5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sabar R, Zmora E . Nurse's response to alarms from NICU monitoring systems Pediatr Res 1997; 41: 174A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Goldstein MR, Barnum PT, Vogt J, Gangitano ES, Stephenson CG, Liberman RL . Conventional pulse oximetry can give spurious data in a neonatal population at risk for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) Pediatr Res 1998; 43: 216A

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rheineck-Leyssius AT, Kalkman CJ . Influence of pulse oximeter settings on the frequency of alarms and detection of hypoxemia: theoretical effects of artifact rejection, alarm delay, averaging, median filtering or a lower setting of the alarm limit J Clin Monit Comput 1998; 14: 151–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Goldstein MR, Furman GI, Sindel BD et al. SatSeconds alarm management misses short desaturations common to periodic breathing and infantile apnea Pediatr Res 2001; 49: 4 400A 2296

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cabal LA, Zanini B, Yeh SY, Hon EH . Neonatal heart rate variability as a prognostic tool in the management of RDS Pediatr Res 1975; 9: 394–7

    Google Scholar 

  13. Poets CF, Stebbens VA, Samuels MP, Southall DP . The relationship between bradycardia, apnea, and hypoxemia in preterm infants Pediatr Res 1993; 34: 2 144–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Galland BC, Hayman RM, Taylor BJ, Bolton DPG, Sayers RM, Williams SM . Factors affecting heart rate variability and heart rate responses to tilting in infants aged 1 and 3 months Pediatr Res 2000; 48: 3 360–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Goldstein MR, Furman GI, Pernia ML et al. Performance of motion-resistant pulse oximeters in tracking neonatal heart rate variability Anesth Analg 2002; 94: Suppl 1 A5

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zahr LK, Balian S . Responses of premature infants to routine nursing interventions and noise in the NICU Nurs Res 1995; 44: 3 179–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Elander G, Hellstrom G . Reduction of noise levels in intensive care units for infants: evaluation of an intervention Heart and Lung 1995; 24: 376–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Long JG, Lucey JF, Philip AGS . Noise and hypoxemia in the intensive care nursery Pediatrics 1980; 65: 143–5

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fletcher J, Page M, Jeffrey HE . Sleep states and neonatal pulse oximetry Sleep 1998; 21: 305–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Brouillette RT, Lavergne J, Leimanis A, Nixon GM, Laden S, McGregor CD . Differences in pulse oximetry technology can affectdetection of sleep disorders in children Anesth Analg 2002; 94: Suppl 1 S47–53

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kopotic RJ, Lindner W . Assessing high-risk infants in the delivery room with pulse oximetry Anesth Analg 2002; 94: Suppl 1 S31–6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Goldstein MR, Liberman RL, Taschuk RD, Thomas A, Vogt JF . Pulse oximetry in transport of poorly perfused babies Pediatrics 1998; 2: 818

    Google Scholar 

  23. AAP Committee on Injury and Poison Prevention. Safe transportation of newborns at hospital discharge Pediatrics 1999; 144: 986–7

  24. Sahni R, Gupta A, Rosen TS . Motion-resistant pulse oximetry during circumcision in neonates Pediatr Res 2000; 47: 4 430A 2544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. STOP-ROP: The STOP-ROP Multicenter Study Group. Supplemental therapeutic oxygen for prethreshold retinopathy of prematurity (STOP-ROP), a randomized, controlled trial Pediatr 2000; 105: 295–310

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by National Institutes of Health GCRC Grant RR00069 to the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics and the Masimo Corporation, Irvine, California. Preliminary aspects of this study were presented at the 1999 PAS annual meeting: Hay WW, Rodden DJ, Collins SM, Melara DL, Hale KA, Fashaw LM. Pulse oximetry in the NICU: conventional versus Masimo SET. Pediatr Res 1999;45(4):304A.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hay, W., Rodden, D., Collins, S. et al. Reliability of Conventional and New Pulse Oximetry in Neonatal Patients. J Perinatol 22, 360–366 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7210740

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7210740

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links