Using Protocols to Improve Patient Outcomes in the Intensive Care Unit: Focus on Mechanical Ventilation and Sepsis

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

The care of critically ill patients has become increasingly complex as severity of illness continues to increase, the number of patients requiring intensive care is on the rise, the amount of clinical information available at the bedside is growing, and the quantity of evidence supporting or refuting specific therapies and interventions for this population is escalating. It has become problematic for clinicians to master all of these tasks and to process the quantity of available clinical and scientific information in an effective and safe manner. Additionally, a culture promoting safety and accountability has emerged in the United States and throughout the world in regard to medical care. The expectation is that patients entering hospitals should receive the highest quality of care with minimal to no medical errors occurring. To accomplish this goal, as well as to allow more accurate monitoring of day to day medical practices, several strategies have been developed that have primarily been employed in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. These strategies include the use of paper-based or electronic protocols for disease (e.g., severe sepsis and septic shock) or process of care (e.g., weaning of mechanical ventilation) management, national guidelines, and targeted clinician education with or without periodic feedback regarding compliance with best medical practices and resultant patient-based outcomes. This review focuses on the use of protocols in the ICU setting and how they can best be utilized to improve patient outcomes.

REFERENCES

• 1 Micek S T, Kollef M H. Using protocols to improve the outcomes of critically ill patients with infection: focus on ventilator-associated pneumonia and severe sepsis. In: Rello J, Kollef M, Diaz E, Rodriguez A Infectious Diseases in Critical Care. Berlin; Springer-Verlag 2007: 78-89
  Google Scholar
• 2 Kollef M H. Clinical practice improvement initiatives: don't be satisfied with the early results.  Chest. 2009;  136 335-338
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Amalberti R, Auroy Y, Berwick D, Barach P. Five system barriers to achieving ultrasafe health care.  Ann Intern Med. 2005;  142 756-764
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Clemmer T P, Spuhler V J, Berwick D M, Nolan T W. Cooperation: the foundation of improvement.  Ann Intern Med. 1998;  128(12 Pt 1) 1004-1009
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Ely E W, Baker A M, Dunagan D P et al.. Effect on the duration of mechanical ventilation of identifying patients capable of breathing spontaneously.  N Engl J Med. 1996;  335 1864-1869
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Kollef M H, Shapiro S D, Silver P et al.. A randomized, controlled trial of protocol-directed versus physician-directed weaning from mechanical ventilation.  Crit Care Med. 1997;  25 567-574
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Marelich G P, Murin S, Battistella F, Inciardi J, Vierra T, Roby M. Protocol weaning of mechanical ventilation in medical and surgical patients by respiratory care practitioners and nurses: effect on weaning time and incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia.  Chest. 2000;  118 459-467
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Ely E W, Bennett P A, Bowton D L, Murphy S M, Florance A M, Haponik E F. Large scale implementation of a respiratory therapist-driven protocol for ventilator weaning.  Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;  159 439-446
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Horst H M, Mouro D, Hall-Jenssens R A, Pamukov N. Decrease in ventilation time with a standardized weaning process.  Arch Surg. 1998;  133 483-488, discussion 488–489
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Brook A D, Ahrens T S, Schaiff R et al.. Effect of a nursing-implemented sedation protocol on the duration of mechanical ventilation.  Crit Care Med. 1999;  27 2609-2615
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Kress J P, Pohlman A S, O'Connor M F, Hall J B. Daily interruption of sedative infusions in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation.  N Engl J Med. 2000;  342 1471-1477
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F et al.. Intensive insulin therapy in the critically ill patients.  N Engl J Med. 2001;  345 1359-1367
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Preissig C M, Hansen I, Roerig P L, Rigby M R. A protocolized approach to identify and manage hyperglycemia in a pediatric critical care unit.  Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2008;  9 581-588
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Lecomte P, Foubert L, Nobels F et al.. Dynamic tight glycemic control during and after cardiac surgery is effective, feasible, and safe.  Anesth Analg. 2008;  107 51-58
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Zack J E, Garrison T, Trovillion E et al.. Effect of an education program aimed at reducing the occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia.  Crit Care Med. 2002;  30 2407-2412
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Babcock H M, Zack J E, Garrison T et al.. An educational intervention to reduce ventilator-associated pneumonia in an integrated health system: a comparison of effects.  Chest. 2004;  125 2224-2231
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 McMullen K M, Zack J, Coopersmith C M, Kollef M, Dubberke E, Warren D K. Use of hypochlorite solution to decrease rates of Clostridium difficile–associated diarrhea.  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007;  28 205-207
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Warren D K, Zack J E, Mayfield J L et al.. The effect of an education program on the incidence of central venous catheter–associated bloodstream infection in a medical ICU.  Chest. 2004;  126 1612-1618
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Merz L R, Warren D K, Kollef M H, Fridkin S K, Fraser V J. The impact of an antibiotic cycling program on empirical therapy for gram-negative infections.  Chest. 2006;  130 1672-1678
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Schuerer D J, Zack J E, Thomas J et al.. Effect of chlorhexidine/silver sulfadiazine-impregnated central venous catheters in an intensive care unit with a low blood stream infection rate after implementation of an educational program: a before-after trial.  Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2007;  8 445-454
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Coopersmith C M, Rebmann T L, Zack J E et al.. Effect of an education program on decreasing catheter-related bloodstream infections in the surgical intensive care unit.  Crit Care Med. 2002;  30 59-64
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Coopersmith C M, Zack J E, Ward M R et al.. The impact of bedside behavior on catheter-related bacteremia in the intensive care unit.  Arch Surg. 2004;  139 131-136
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Rello J, Diaz E, Roque M, Vallés J. Risk factors for developing pneumonia within 48 hours of intubation.  Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;  159 1742-1746
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Pandharipande P, Cotton B A, Shintani A et al.. Prevalence and risk factors for development of delirium in surgical and trauma intensive care unit patients.  J Trauma. 2008;  65 34-41
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Lindquist L A, Feinglass J, Martin G J. How sedative medication in older people affects patient risk factors for developing pressure ulcers.  J Wound Care. 2003;  12 272-275
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Kollef M H, Levy N T, Ahrens T S, Schaiff R, Prentice D, Sherman G. The use of continuous I.V. sedation is associated with prolongation of mechanical ventilation.  Chest. 1998;  114 541-548
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Brattebø G, Hofoss D, Flaatten H, Muri A K, Gjerde S, Plsek P E. Effect of a scoring system and protocol for sedation on duration of patients' need for ventilator support in a surgical intensive care unit.  BMJ. 2002;  324 1386-1389
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Schweickert W D, Gehlbach B K, Pohlman A S, Hall J B, Kress J P. Daily interruption of sedative infusions and complications of critical illness in mechanically ventilated patients.  Crit Care Med. 2004;  32 1272-1276
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Burns S M, Earven S, Fisher C University of Virginia Long Term Mechanical Ventilation Team et al. Implementation of an institutional program to improve clinical and financial outcomes of mechanically ventilated patients: one-year outcomes and lessons learned.  Crit Care Med. 2003;  31 2752-2763
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Girard T D, Kress J P, Fuchs B D et al.. Efficacy and safety of a paired sedation and ventilator weaning protocol for mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care (awakening and breathing controlled trial): a randomised controlled trial.  Lancet. 2008;  371 126-134
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 MacLaren R, Plamondon J M, Ramsay K B, Rocker G M, Patrick W D, Hall R I. A prospective evaluation of empiric versus protocol-based sedation and analgesia.  Pharmacotherapy. 2000;  20 662-672
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Carson S S, Kress J P, Rodgers J E et al.. A randomized trial of intermittent lorazepam versus propofol with daily interruption in mechanically ventilated patients.  Crit Care Med. 2006;  34 1326-1332
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Riker R R, Shehabi Y, Bokesch P M SEDCOM (Safety and Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine Compared With Midazolam) Study Group et al. Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for sedation of critically ill patients: a randomized trial.  JAMA. 2009;  301 489-499
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Esteban A, Alía I, Gordo F The Spanish Lung Failure Collaborative Group et al. Extubation outcome after spontaneous breathing trials with T-tube or pressure support ventilation.  Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;  156(2 Pt 1) 459-465
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Esteban A, Alía I, Tobin M J Spanish Lung Failure Collaborative Group et al. Effect of spontaneous breathing trial duration on outcome of attempts to discontinue mechanical ventilation.  Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;  159 512-518
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Iregui M, Ward S, Clinikscale D, Clayton D, Kollef M H. Use of a handheld computer by respiratory care practitioners to improve the efficiency of weaning patients from mechanical ventilation.  Crit Care Med. 2002;  30 2038-2043
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 Krishnan J A, Moore D, Robeson C, Rand C S, Fessler H E. A prospective, controlled trial of a protocol-based strategy to discontinue mechanical ventilation.  Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;  169 673-678
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 38 Wood K A, Lewis L, Von Harz B, Kollef M H. The use of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in the emergency department: results of a randomized clinical trial.  Chest. 1998;  113 1339-1346
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 39 Mehta S, Hill N S. Noninvasive ventilation.  Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;  163 540-577
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 40 Thorens J-B, Kaelin R M, Jolliet P, Chevrolet J C. Influence of the quality of nursing on the duration of weaning from mechanical ventilation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.  Crit Care Med. 1995;  23 1807-1815
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 41 Ream R S, Mackey K, Leet T et al.. Association of nursing workload and unplanned extubations in a pediatric intensive care unit.  Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2007;  8 366-371
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 42 Pittet D, Mourouga P, Perneger T V. Compliance with handwashing in a teaching hospital. Infection Control Program.  Ann Intern Med. 1999;  130 126-130
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 43 Vicca A F. Nursing staff workload as a determinant of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus spread in an adult intensive therapy unit.  J Hosp Infect. 1999;  43 109-113
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 44 Needleman J, Buerhaus P, Mattke S, Stewart M, Zelevinsky K. Nurse-staffing levels and the quality of care in hospitals.  N Engl J Med. 2002;  346 1715-1722
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 45 Fridkin S K, Pear S M, Williamson T H, Galgiani J N, Jarvis W R. The role of understaffing in central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections.  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1996;  17 150-158
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 46 Archibald L K, Manning M L, Bell L M, Banerjee S, Jarvis W R. Patient density, nurse-to-patient ratio and nosocomial infection risk in a pediatric cardiac intensive care unit.  Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1997;  16 1045-1048
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 47 Kollef M H, Ward S. The influence of mini-BAL cultures on patient outcomes: implications for the antibiotic management of ventilator-associated pneumonia.  Chest. 1998;  113 412-420
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 48 Luna C M, Vujacich P, Niederman M S et al.. Impact of BAL data on the therapy and outcome of ventilator-associated pneumonia.  Chest. 1997;  111 676-685
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 49 Alvarez-Lerma F. ICU-Acquired Pneumonia Study Group . Modification of empiric antibiotic treatment in patients with pneumonia acquired in the intensive care unit.  Intensive Care Med. 1996;  22 387-394
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 50 Iregui M, Ward S, Sherman G, Fraser V J, Kollef M H. Clinical importance of delays in the initiation of appropriate antibiotic treatment for ventilator-associated pneumonia.  Chest. 2002;  122 262-268
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 51 American Thoracic Society . Guidelines for the management of adults with hospital-acquired, ventilator-associated, and healthcare-associated pneumonia.  Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;  171 388-416
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 52 Namias N, Samiian L, Nino D et al.. Incidence and susceptibility of pathogenic bacteria vary between intensive care units within a single hospital: implications for empiric antibiotic strategies.  J Trauma. 2000;  49 638-645 discussion 645-646
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 53 Rello J, Sa-Borges M, Correa H, Leal S R, Baraibar J. Variations in etiology of ventilator-associated pneumonia across four treatment sites: implications for antimicrobial prescribing practices.  Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;  160 608-613
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 54 Ibrahim E H, Ward S, Sherman G, Schaiff R, Fraser V J, Kollef M H. Experience with a clinical guideline for the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia.  Crit Care Med. 2001;  29 1109-1115
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 55 Wood G C, Mueller E W, Croce M A, Boucher B A, Hanes S D, Fabian T C. Evaluation of a clinical pathway for ventilator-associated pneumonia: changes in bacterial flora and the adequacy of empiric antibiotics over a three-year period.  Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2005;  6 203-213
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 56 Lancaster J W, Lawrence K R, Fong J J et al.. Impact of an institution-specific hospital-acquired pneumonia protocol on the appropriateness of antibiotic therapy and patient outcomes.  Pharmacotherapy. 2008;  28 852-862
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 57 Soo Hoo G W, Wen Y E, Nguyen T V, Goetz M B. Impact of clinical guidelines in the management of severe hospital-acquired pneumonia.  Chest. 2005;  128 2778-2787
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 58 Rello J, Vidaur L, Sandiumenge A et al.. De-escalation therapy in ventilator-associated pneumonia.  Crit Care Med. 2004;  32 2183-2190
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 59 Micek S T, Ward S, Fraser V J, Kollef M H. A randomized controlled trial of an antibiotic discontinuation policy for clinically suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia.  Chest. 2004;  125 1791-1799
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 60 Babcock H M, Zack J E, Garrison T et al.. An educational intervention to reduce ventilator-associated pneumonia in an integrated health system: a comparison of effects.  Chest. 2004;  125 2224-2231
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 61 Zack J E, Garrison T, Trovillion E et al.. Effect of an education program aimed at reducing the occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia.  Crit Care Med. 2002;  30 2407-2412
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 62 Hotchkiss R S, Karl I E. The pathophysiology and treatment of sepsis.  N Engl J Med. 2003;  348 138-150
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 63 Annane D, Bellissant E, Cavaillon J M. Septic shock.  Lancet. 2005;  365 63-78
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 64 Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S Early Goal-Directed Therapy Collaborative Group et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock.  N Engl J Med. 2001;  345 1368-1377
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 65 Annane D, Sébille V, Charpentier C et al.. Effect of treatment with low doses of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone on mortality in patients with septic shock.  JAMA. 2002;  288 862-871
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 66 Bernard G R, Vincent J-L, Laterre P-F Recombinant human protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis (PROWESS) study group et al. Efficacy and safety of recombinant human activated protein C for severe sepsis.  N Engl J Med. 2001;  344 699-709
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 67 Dellinger R P, Levy M M, Carlet J M International Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008.  Crit Care Med. 2008;  36 296-327
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 68 Harbarth S, Garbino J, Pugin J, Romand J A, Lew D, Pittet D. Inappropriate initial antimicrobial therapy and its effect on survival in a clinical trial of immunomodulating therapy for severe sepsis.  Am J Med. 2003;  115 529-535
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 69 Garnacho-Montero J, Garcia-Garmendia J L, Barrero-Almodovar A, Jimenez-Jimenez F J, Perez-Paredes C, Ortiz-Leyba C. Impact of adequate empirical antibiotic therapy on the outcome of patients admitted to the intensive care unit with sepsis.  Crit Care Med. 2003;  31 2742-2751
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 70 Micek S T, Isakow W, Shannon W, Kollef M H. Predictors of hospital mortality for patients with severe sepsis treated with drotrecogin alfa (activated).  Pharmacotherapy. 2005;  25 26-34
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 71 Vyas D, Javadi P, Dipasco P J, Buchman T G, Hotchkiss R S, Coopersmith C M. Early antibiotic administration but not antibody therapy directed against IL-6 improves survival in septic mice predicted to die on basis of high IL-6 levels.  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2005;  289 R1048-R1053
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 72 Trzeciak S, Dellinger R P, Abate N L et al.. Translating research to clinical practice: a 1-year experience with implementing early goal-directed therapy for septic shock in the emergency department.  Chest. 2006;  129 225-232
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 73 Shapiro N I, Howell M D, Talmor D et al.. Implementation and outcomes of the Multiple Urgent Sepsis Therapies (MUST) protocol.  Crit Care Med. 2006;  34 1025-1032
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 74 Micek S T, Roubinian N, Heuring T et al.. Before-after study of a standardized hospital order set for the management of septic shock.  Crit Care Med. 2006;  34 2707-2713
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 75 Kortgen A, Niederprüm P, Bauer M. Implementation of an evidence-based “standard operating procedure” and outcome in septic shock.  Crit Care Med. 2006;  34 943-949
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 76 Gao F, Melody T, Daniels D F, Giles S, Fox S. The impact of compliance with 6-hour and 24-hour sepsis bundles on hospital mortality in patients with severe sepsis: a prospective observational study.  Crit Care. 2005;  9 R764-R770
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 77 Thiel S W, Asghar M F, Micek S T, Reichley R M, Doherty J A, Kollef M H. Hospital-wide impact of a standardized order set for the management of bacteremic severe sepsis.  Crit Care Med. 2009;  37 819-824
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 78 Thiel S W, Rosini J M, Shannon W et al.. Early prediction of septic shock in hospitalized patients.  J Hosp Med. 2010;  , In press
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 79 Finfer S, Chittock D R, Su S Y NICE-SUGAR Study Investigators et al. Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients.  N Engl J Med. 2009;  360 1283-1297
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Marin H KollefM.D. 

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine

660 S. Euclid Ave., Campus Box 8052, St. Louis, MO 63110

Email: mkollef@dom.wustl.edu