Chest
Volume 134, Issue 4, October 2008, Pages 712-718
Journal home page for Chest

Original Research
Pulmonary Function Testing
A Possible Association Between Suspected Restrictive Pattern as Assessed by Ordinary Pulmonary Function Test and the Metabolic Syndrome

https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.07-3003Get rights and content

Background

Impaired restrictive pulmonary function has been reported to be associated with insulin resistance and metabolic abnormalities. However, the possible association of restrictive pulmonary defect with metabolic syndrome (MetS) is not well understood. We examined the association in comparison with C-reactive protein (CRP), which is a predictor for MetS.

Methods

We recruited 2,396 apparently healthy adults and investigated the associations among pulmonary function, metabolic abnormality, and MetS, as defined by three different criteria. Abnormal pulmonary function was evaluated by both continuous pulmonary function variables including the percentage of predicted FVC (%PFVC) and a clinical category defined according to the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society guidelines.

Results

CRP and %PFVC, but not FEV1/FVC ratio, were significantly correlated with metabolic abnormalities even after adjustment for confounders including waist circumference. After adjustment for age, sex, and height, the odds ratios (ORs) of a restrictive pattern (RP), as defined by a reduced FVC and a normal FEV1/FVC ratio using the lower limit of normal and RP substitutively defined by reduced FVC and an FEV1/FVC ratio of ≥ 85% for MetS, were 1.76 to 2.52 (p < 0.05 to < 0.0001) and 1.87 to 2.28 (p < 0.05 to < 0.01), respectively. The obstructive pattern (OP) was not significantly associated with any MetS criteria. A moderate-to-severe RP, but not a high CRP level (> 3.0 mg/L), was consistently associated with the three MetS criteria (OR, 2.08 to 3.57; p < 0.05 to < 0.01), even after adjustment for confounders.

Conclusion

Impaired restrictive pulmonary function, but not OP, might be associated with metabolic disorders and MetS in a severity-dependent manner.

Section snippets

Subjects

The study was carried out in collaboration with Josai University (Sakado, Japan) and Social Insurance Omiya General Hospital (Saitama, Japan). The protocol was approved by The Ethics Committee of Josai University and Council of the Hospital, and informed consent was obtained. A total of 2,396 apparently healthy subjects (age range, 30 to 80 years) were randomly recruited from among those persons who lived in the suburbs and had undergone a complete medical checkup at the Omiya General Hospital.

Results

The clinical characteristics of the study participants are presented in Table 1. Most subjects were nonobese with relatively good cardiovascular risks profiles. The prevalence of RPLLN, RPSub, and OP were 5.4% (n = 130), 2.8% (n = 66), and 7.6% (n = 202), respectively.

Figure 1 shows the %PFVC and FEV1/FVC ratio according to categorized NAMC. In both nonsmokers (n = 1,741) and smokers (n = 655), the %PFVC values were significantly decreased across increasing NAMC (for both, the p value for

Discussion

This study was conducted to examine the association between suspected RP, as assessed by ordinary pulmonary function tests and MetS, as well as the correlation between metabolic abnormalities and lung compliance in an apparently healthy population. Current results suggest that %PFVC, but not FEV1/FVC ratio, may be correlated to the degree of metabolic abnormalities, such as the NAMC, even after adjustment for confounders. Consistently, the effect of smoking on %PFVC was obviously independent of

Conclusion

Impaired restrictive pulmonary function might be associated with metabolic disorders and MetS in a severity dependent manner in an apparently healthy population. Further large studies, including prospective studies along with a proper definition for RP, are needed to confirm this association and clarify the existence of a cause-effect relationship.

References (33)

  • WA Davis et al.

    Glycemic exposure is associated with reduced pulmonary function in type 2 diabetes: the Fremantle Diabetes Study

    Diabetes Care

    (2004)
  • HC Yeh et al.

    Vital capacity as a predictor of incident type 2 diabetes: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study

    Diabetes Care

    (2005)
  • C Schnack et al.

    Pulmonary dysfunction in type 1 diabetes in relation to metabolic long-term control and to incipient diabetic nephropathy

    Nephron

    (1996)
  • P Makkar et al.

    Ventilatory pulmonary function tests in type 1 diabetes mellitus

    J Assoc Physicians India

    (2000)
  • MS Boulbou et al.

    Diabetes mellitus and lung function

    Med Princ Pract

    (2003)
  • WQ Gan et al.

    Association between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and systemic inflammation: a systematic review and a meta-analysis

    Thorax

    (2004)
  • Cited by (81)

    • Relationship between metabolic syndrome and pulmonary function in workers with respiratory dust exposure in Iran: Metabolic syndrome and pulmonary function

      2021, Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, the primary mechanism is not well known. There are studies wherein FVC was associated with the MetS level [13], some with both indicators FVC and FEV1 [1,2,14], and others manifest as an obstructive pattern [6,15–17]. A historical cohort study after a median four years of follow-up showed that a decrease in FEV1% and FEV1/FVC ratio was associated with the progression to metabolically abnormal phenotype in subjects with metabolically healthy non-overweight and with mean age 43.5 years [15].

    • Asthma and obesity in adults

      2020, Revue des Maladies Respiratoires
    • Obesity and asthma

      2018, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
    • Metabolic syndrome impact on pulmonary function of women

      2019, Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The authors have reported to the ACCP that no significant conflicts of interest exist with any companies/organizations whose products or services may be discussed in this article.

    Reproduction of this article is prohibited without written permission from the American College of Chest Physicians (www.chestjournal.org/misc/reprints.shtml).

    View full text