Chest
Volume 143, Issue 1, January 2013, Pages 30-36
Journal home page for Chest

Original Research
Critical Care
Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist vs Pressure Support Ventilation for Noninvasive Ventilation During Acute Respiratory Failure: A Crossover Physiologic Study

https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.12-0424Get rights and content

Background

Patient-ventilator asynchrony is common during noninvasive ventilation (NIV) with pressure support ventilation (PSV). We examined the effect of neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) delivered through a facemask on synchronization in patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF).

Methods

This was a prospective, physiologic, crossover study of 13 patients with ARF (median PaO2/FIO2, 196 [interquartile range (IQR), 142-225]) given two 30-min trials of NIV with PSV and NAVA in random order. Diaphragm electrical activity (EAdi), neural inspiratory time (TIn), trigger delay (Td), asynchrony index (AI), arterial blood gas levels, and patient discomfort were recorded.

Results

There were significantly fewer asynchrony events during NAVA than during PSV (10 [IQR, 5-14] events vs 17 [IQR, 8-24] events, P = .017), and the occurrence of severe asynchrony (AI > 10%) was also less under NAVA (P = .027). Ineffective efforts and delayed cycling were significantly less with NAVA (P < .05 for both). NAVA was also associated with reduced Td (0 [IQR, 0-30] milliseconds vs 90 [IQR, 30-130] milliseconds, P < .001) and inspiratory time in excess (10 [IQR, 0-28] milliseconds vs 125 [IQR, 20-312] milliseconds, P < .001), but TIn was similar under PSV and NAVA. The EAdi signal to its maximal value was higher during NAVA than during PSV (P = .017). There were no significant differences in arterial blood gases or patient discomfort under PSV and NAVA.

Conclusion

In view of specific experimental conditions, our comparison of PSV and NAVA indicated that NAVA significantly reduced severe patient-ventilator asynchrony and resulted in similar improvements in gas exchange during NIV for ARF.

Section snippets

Materials and Methods

This study was performed in the ICU of the Estaing Hospital (University of Clermont-Ferrand, France) from July 2011 to September 2011. The Institutional Review Board (Comité de Protection des Personnes Sud-Est I, Clermont-Ferrand, France) approved the protocol (reference number 2010-A01197-32), and each patient or next of kin provided written informed consent. This study followed CONSORT recommendations regarding the report of randomized trials.11

Results

Sixteen consecutive patients with ARF were enrolled initially. Three of these patients were excluded, two because a worsening of ARF required tracheal intubation, and one because of an inappropriate EAdi signal. A total of 13 patients completed the study protocol (Table 1). There was no patient with COPD. On admission, all patients needed oxygen therapy (mean FIO2, 50% ± 26%).

Table 2 shows the ventilatory settings under PSV and NAVA. No relevant clinical problems occurred during any procedure,

Discussion

With respect to specific experimental conditions, the results of the current study indicate that the use of NAVA instead of PSV for NIV in patients with ARF improves patient-ventilator interaction. In particular, NAVA delivered through a facemask improved patient-ventilator interaction by reducing the total number of asynchrony events, severe patient-ventilator asynchrony (AI > 10%), the Td, and TIexe.

Our results agree with those of previous studies that showed that NAVA can improve

Acknowledgments

Author contributions: Drs Bertrand, Futier, and Constantin are guarantors of the paper and take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, from inception to published article.

Dr Bertrand: contributed to the study design and protocol and recording and analysis of the data.

Dr Futier: contributed to the study design and protocol and writing and revision of the manuscript.

Dr Coisel: contributed to the study design and protocol and writing and revision of the manuscript.

Dr Matecki:

References (36)

  • L Piquilloud et al.

    Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist improves patient-ventilator interaction

    Intensive Care Med

    (2011)
  • J Spahija et al.

    Patient-ventilator interaction during pressure support ventilation and neurally adjusted ventilatory assist

    Crit Care Med

    (2010)
  • KF Schulz et al.

    CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

    BMJ

    (2010)
  • CA Sinderby et al.

    Enhancement of signal quality in esophageal recordings of diaphragm EMG

    J Appl Physiol

    (1997)
  • J Barwing et al.

    Evaluation of the catheter positioning for neurally adjusted ventilatory assist

    Intensive Care Med

    (2009)
  • L Vignaux et al.

    Performance of noninvasive ventilation algorithms on ICU ventilators during pressure support: a clinical study

    Intensive Care Med

    (2010)
  • D Colombo et al.

    Physiologic response to varying levels of pressure support and neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in patients with acute respiratory failure

    Intensive Care Med

    (2008)
  • N Terzi et al.

    Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in patients recovering spontaneous breathing after acute respiratory distress syndrome: physiological evaluation

    Crit Care Med

    (2010)
  • Cited by (72)

    • Asynchrony patient-ventilator: Practical clinical approach

      2024, Acta Colombiana de Cuidado Intensivo
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Funding/Support: The authors have reported to CHEST that no funding was received for this study.

    Reproduction of this article is prohibited without written permission from the American College of Chest Physicians. See online for more details.

    View full text