Chest
Volume 128, Issue 1, July 2005, Pages 48-54
Journal home page for Chest

Clinical Investigations
Copd
A Randomized Controlled Trial To Assess the Optimal Dose and Effect of Nebulized Albuterol in Acute Exacerbations of COPD

https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.128.1.48Get rights and content

Study objectives

Despite the widespread use of short-acting, inhaled β2-agonists in acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPDs), little is known about their optimal dose. The aims of this study are to compare the bronchodilator response to incremental doses of inhaled albuterol during and after recovery from an AECOPD, and to compare the effects of regular nebulized albuterol, 2.5 mg and 5 mg, on the speed of recovery.

Methods

Eighty-six patients admitted with an AECOPD were recruited. Each patient was administered incremental doses of inhaled albuterol on hospital admission and following recovery. Dose-response curves were constructed based on FEV1 and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) recorded after each incremental dose. Patients were then randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive 2.5 mg or 5 mg of nebulized albuterol q4h until recovery. Twice-daily PEFR, the number of extra doses of bronchodilators, and side effects reported were recorded.

Results

Maximal bronchodilation (Emax) FEV1 (maximal bronchodilatory response to albuterol) increased from 0.64 ± 0.27 L/min during the exacerbation to 0.94 ± 0.38 L/min during recovery (p < 0.001). The Emax PEFR increased from 147.53 ± 62.46 L/min to 222.94 ± 73.82 L/min after recovery (p = <0.001). There was no significant difference in rate of recovery of PEFR (p = 0.684), duration of hospital stay (p = 0.084), or side effects (p = 0.506) between the groups receiving 2.5 mg or 5 mg of nebulized albuterol.

Conclusions

There was significant improvement in Emax to inhaled albuterol as the COPD exacerbation resolved. There was no significant difference in outcomes including length of hospital stay or recovery of lung function between patients treated with regular 2.5 mg vs 5 mg of nebulized albuterol during an AECOPD.

Section snippets

Patients

This was a multicenter study done in the respiratory departments of four teaching hospitals in Yorkshire, England. Eighty-six patients admitted with an exacerbation of previously known COPD based on BTS criteria8 were recruited into the study. All patients had an FEV1 < 80% of the predicted value with < 15% and/or 200-mL reversibility to inhaled bronchodilators. AECOPDs among patients admitted to hospital were diagnosed if two of the three factors were present, namely increased dyspnea,

Results

Among the 86 COPD patients admitted with acute exacerbation, there was slight female predominance (47 female and 39 male patients). The mean age of the patients was 69.26 ± 9.25 years (± SD) [range, 47 to 90 years], and the mean FEV1 was 0.816 ± 0.41 L/min (range, 0.30 to 2.14 L/min; 18 to 70% of predicted). Table 1shows the characteristics of patients included in the study.

The study did not show any significant difference in terms of outcome between patient groups receiving 2.5 mg or 5 mg of

Discussion

This study demonstrates that there is no significant difference in clinical outcome in patients treated every 4 h with either 2.5 mg or 5 mg of nebulized albuterol throughout an AECOPD. These results compliment earlier reports of patients with stable COPD in which near-Emax occurred with smaller doses of nebulized terbutaline than those conventionally used over 12 weeks without development of drug tolerance.10 Fifty percent of Emax during AECOPD in this study was achieved with a cumulative dose

References (24)

  • C Teale et al.

    Response to nebulised ipratropium bromide and terbutaline in acute severe asthma

    Respir Med

    (1992)
  • JB Cheng et al.

    Comparison of muscarinic and β-adrenergic receptors between bovine peripheral lung and tracheal smooth muscles: a striking difference in receptor concentration

    Life Sci

    (1982)
  • TAR Seemungal et al.

    Time course and recovery of exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

    Am J Respir Crit Care Med

    (2000)
  • TAR Seemungal et al.

    Effect of exacerbation on quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

    Am J Respir Crit Care Med

    (1998)
  • GC Donaldson et al.

    Relationship between exacerbation frequency and lung function decline in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

    Thorax

    (2002)
  • P Sestini et al.

    Short-acting β2-agonists for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The Cochrane Library

    (2003)
  • MJ Belman et al.

    Inhaled bronchodilators reduce dynamic hyperinflation during exercise in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

    Am J Respir Crit Care Med

    (1996)
  • EH Walters et al.

    Optimal dose of salbutamol respiratory solution: comparison of three doses with plasma levels

    Thorax

    (1981)
  • JN Stainforth et al.

    Dosage and delivery of nebulised β agonists in hospital

    Thorax

    (1983)
  • British Thoracic Society

    BTS guidelines for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

    Thorax

    (1997)
  • National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE)

    Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: national clinical guideline for management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in adults in primary and secondary care

    Thorax

    (2004)
  • C Teale et al.

    Regular nebulised terbutaline in chronic obstructive airways disease: dose-response studies fail to detect tolerance

    Br J Clin Pharmacol

    (1991)
  • Cited by (30)

    • Controversies in Management of Hyperkalemia

      2018, Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      The latter decrease seems to be sustained for at least 2 h (8,69,82,97,99,105). The albuterol nebulized dose is higher than typically used for obstructive airway disease, but it can be safely given and can result in a decrease of 0.4–1.0 mmol/L at 1 h (99,106). Intravenous beta-agonist medication can be utilized, via administration of albuterol 0.5 mg i.v. or salbutamol 2.5 mg i.v., although i.v. beta-agonists are more likely to cause side-effects than nebulized doses (72,100).

    • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Emergency care in acute exacerbation

      2015, African Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      MDI may be a preferable route in limited-resource settings, primarily due to its portability and ability to self-administer. Agreement on ideal dose and frequency of SABA/anticholinergic administration in AECOPD has not been well established, but trends toward increasing amounts for increasing exacerbation severity.23,52 Methylxanthines remain second line treatment in GOLD’s algorithm,1 although data supporting their benefit are unconvincing.

    • Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in the Emergency Department

      2012, Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      There is little evidence to support the dose amount or frequency of dosing. One study in admitted patients with AECOPD did not show a significant difference in clinical outcomes in patients treated every 4 hours with either 2.5 mg or 5 mg of nebulized albuterol.84 Another ED-based study of 86 patients with AECOPD compared hourly and every 20-minute dosing of albuterol.

    • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

      2012, Emergency Medicine: Clinical Essentials, SECOND EDITION
    • Management of severe hyperkalemia

      2008, Critical Care Medicine
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text