Chest
Volume 88, Issue 3, September 1985, Pages 360-363
Journal home page for Chest

Clinical Investigations
Chest Percussion and Postural Drainage in Patients with Bronchiectasis

https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.88.3.360Get rights and content

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease have been treated routinely with chest physical therapy for many years in spite of a lack of scientific validation of this procedure. Only recently have the indications for chest physical therapy been clarified. It is currently believed that such therapy is especially beneficial in patients with copious secretions, and that it is less effective in patients with scanty secretions. No study has specifically evaluated the efficacy of chest physical therapy in patients with bronchiectasis. We accordingly evaluated 13 patients with stable bronchiectasis to determine the effects of chest physical therapy on pulmonary function, arterial oxygenation, and sputum production and to assess whether this therapy was associated with any significant side-effects. We found that chest physical therapy was safe and well tolerated and assisted the patients in mobilization of their sputum. However, such therapy had no immediate delayed effects on pulmonary function or oxygen saturation.

Section snippets

Methods

A total of 13 patients (11 men and two women), ranging in age from 31 to 68 (mean 52) years, were included in this study. The patients were selected from individuals seen in outpatient pulmonary clinics of the University Health Center Hospitals.

Patients were entered in the study if they met the following criteria:

  • (1)

    Were diagnosed as having bronchiectasis and were being followed as outpatients by the University of Pittsburgh Division of Pulmonary Medicine. The diagnoses were, in general,

Results

Results of baseline pulmonary function tests and resting oxygen saturations for the study population are shown in Table 1. The patients had a wide range of pulmonary function abnormalities with reductions in forced vital capacity (mean 3.00 ±1.20 L – 69 ± 29 percent of predicted), FEV1 (mean 1.66 ±0.74 L – 53±24 percent of predicted), and PEF (mean 5.05 ±3.00 L/s – 36 percent of predicted).

The results of pulmonary function testing, oxygen saturation measurements, and heart rate measurements for

Discussion

This study demonstrates that chest physical therapy in patients with bronchiectasis is safe and helpful in the mobilization of secretions. However, this removal of secretions is not associated with any change in the pulmonary function indices which were measured.

The results of chest physical therapy on pulmonary function in this study are comparable to that found in other studies of adult patients with stable chronic lung disease. Both May and Munt11 and March12 studied patients with chronic

References (19)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (51)

  • Chest Physiotherapy Techniques in Bronchiectasis

    2012, Clinics in Chest Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    There is little evidence of the effectiveness of MTs. Evidence suggests a trend toward an increased rate of clearance with percussion and chest compression.21–23 PEP uses a set resistance that is applied throughout expiration to enhance the mobilization of secretions.

  • Improvement in health status following bronchopulmonary hygiene physical therapy in patients with bronchiectasis

    2008, Respiratory Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    Despite its routine use in both acute exacerbations and chronic non-cystic fibrosis (CF) bronchiectasis, the evidence for its efficacy is limited. BHPT may reduce sputum volume and increase clearance but there are no studies investigating the impact of BHPT on health-related QOL.6–8 A recent Cochrane database systematic review identified few clinical trials investigating BHPT in non-CF bronchiectasis and most of these contained small numbers of patients.9

View all citing articles on Scopus

Manuscript received January 22; revision accepted March 20.

View full text