Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Top 10 Papers in 2020
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • Call for Abstracts 2021
    • 2020 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Top 10 Papers in 2020
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • Call for Abstracts 2021
    • 2020 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Follow aarc on Twitter
  • Visit aarc on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Neonatal Transcutaneous Carbon Dioxide Monitoring—Effect on Clinical Management and Outcomes

Sagori Mukhopadhyay, Rie Maurer and Karen M Puopolo
Respiratory Care January 2016, 61 (1) 90-97; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.04212
Sagori Mukhopadhyay
Division of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, the Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Rie Maurer
Department of Pediatric Newborn Medicine and the Center of Clinical Investigation, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karen M Puopolo
Division of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, the Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This work aimed to compare frequency of blood gas measurements per day of mechanical ventilation, occurrence of extreme blood gas CO2 values, and clinical outcomes among ventilated neonates managed with and without transcutaneous carbon dioxide (PtcCO2) monitors. This work also measures agreement between simultaneous PtcCO2 and blood gas CO2 measurements and ascertains factors that affect agreement.

METHODS: This is a cohort study with retrospective analysis comparing 5,726 blood gas measurements and clinical outcomes for 123 neonates intubated for >48 h before and after the introduction of transcutaneous carbon-di-oxide monitoring devices in a single tertiary care unit.

RESULTS: Median (interquartile range) blood gas frequency per mechanical ventilation day was 3.9 (2.6–5.3) and 2.9 (2.1–4.0) before and after PtcCO2 monitoring (P = .002) without differences in clinical outcomes at discharge. After adjusting for confounders using Poisson regression, this difference remained significant. The mean ± 2 SD blood gas-PtcCO2 difference was −5.2 ± 17.3 mm Hg. 64% of simultaneous blood gas-PtcCO2 measurements per subject were within ±7 mm Hg. Greater bias was noted with arterial sample and during the use of high-frequency ventilation.

CONCLUSION: Despite only moderate agreement between simultaneous PtcCO2 and blood gas measurements, PtcCO2 monitoring statistically decreased blood gas frequency among ventilated neonates without affecting the duration of mechanical ventilation or clinical outcomes at discharge. The clinical impact of this technology appears to be minimal.

  • capnometry
  • neonatal
  • transcutaneous monitoring
  • outcomes

Introduction

Infants admitted to the neonatal ICU (NICU) frequently require respiratory support in the form of mechanical ventilation. Arterial, venous and capillary blood gas measurements allow clinicians to gauge the effect of mechanical ventilation on the infant's gas exchange. Samples for blood gas measurement are obtained by invasive techniques resulting in blood loss and only depict the physiologic state of the infant at the point in time when the sample was obtained.1 Noninvasive methods to estimate PCO2 offer a means of continuous assessment of ventilation without accompanying blood loss and infant manipulation. Transcutaneous carbon-dioxide monitors use heated skin sensors that increase blood flow through the cutaneous capillary system. The locally produced PCO2 is then measured electrochemically and adjusted to provide an output reflective of the arterial blood PCO2. This transcutaneously measure carbon-di-oxide (PtcCO2) has been studied in selected groups of infants for short periods of time, demonstrating good agreement with arterial blood PCO2.2–6 PtcCO2 monitors are increasingly used in NICUs and are anticipated to improve respiratory and overall care of the neonates.7,8 However, there are reasons to be concerned about the impact of PtcCO2 monitoring in the course of standard NICU clinical care. Wide agreement between PtcCO2 and arterial blood gas has been reported in the preterm population.2 Many NICU infants remain intubated for long duration with evolving physiological states of cardiac output and fluctuating PCO2 values that may alter PtcCO2 agreement.9,10 Further, many blood gas samples used in the NICU are capillary samples, and reports to date have correlated PtcCO2 with arterial or venous samples.2,7,11

Although the American Association for Respiratory Care recognized the use of PtcCO2 values in specific clinical situations, their statement noted that a hazard of PtcCO2 use is “misinterpretation of falsely elevated or decreased values leading to inappropriate treatment of the patient.”12 Such false alarms could potentially lead to increased blood draws instead of reducing them or cause unnecessary ventilator manipulation and negatively affect outcomes. There is little published data on these issues. In this study, we aimed to determine whether the use of PtcCO2 monitoring in everyday clinical practice among mechanically ventilated neonates over their entire course of intubation altered respiratory management, specifically blood draws and occurrence of extreme blood gas PCO2 values, or impacted neonatal morbidities. We also aimed to measure agreement of simultaneously measured PtcCO2 and blood gas CO2 values and identify factors associated with discordance.

QUICK LOOK

Current knowledge

PtcCO2 monitoring uses heated skin sensors that increase blood flow to the cutaneous tissue. The locally produced PCO2 is then measured electrochemically and adjusted to provide an output reflective of the arterial blood PCO2. The relationship of PtcCO2 to PaCO2 is variable, depending on perfusion, temperature, and a number of other variables.

What this paper contributes to our knowledge

There was a moderate agreement between simultaneous PtcCO2 and PaCO2 measurements. The use of PtcCO2 monitoring statistically decreased blood gas frequency among ventilated neonates without impacting the duration of mechanical ventilation or clinical outcomes.

Methods

Study Population and Design

This study was approved by the Partners Healthcare Human Research Committee. PtcCO2 monitors (SenTec AG, Therwil, Switzerland) were introduced for clinical practice to our level III NICU in October 2010. This is a cohort study with retrospective analysis of data spanning 12 months before the introduction of the PtcCO2 monitors, designated pre-PtcCO2 (October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2010), compared with 14 months following their introduction, designated post-PtcCO2 (December 1, 2010 to January 31, 2012). October and November of 2010 were considered a washout period (Fig. 1). All infants admitted to the NICU and mechanically ventilated for >48 h were included. In the post-PtcCO2 cohort, inclusion criteria required PtcCO2 monitor use for ≥50% of the ventilated time because we sought to measure only infants with consistent exposure to the PtcCO2 monitor during their care. To detect a difference of 1 blood gas/day of mechanical ventilation with a power of 0.8, we needed at least 52 subjects in each period (PS version 3.1.2). Because we were interested in either an increase or a decrease in blood gas frequency and any increase would be of clinical relevance, this difference was chosen. The post-PtcCO2 period was longer to capture this sample size. Infants with major congenital anomalies as defined by the Vermont Oxford Network or those transferred before extubation were excluded. End-tidal CO2 monitoring was not practiced in the NICU during the study period.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Flow chart. NICU = neonatal ICU.

Laboratory and Respiratory Data

Blood gas analyses were performed on a Siemens (Rapid Lab 1240) analyzer, and results were obtained from an electronic laboratory data repository. PtcCO2 monitors were applied by respiratory therapists on physician order. Per policy, all ventilated infants were eligible for its use. It was calibrated every 8–12 h, initially with a blood gas drawn 30 min after PtcCO2 monitor application. Respiratory data were abstracted from the flow sheets where respiratory therapists make date and time stamped entries for PtcCO2 measurements, simultaneously drawn blood gas results (when performed), and hourly ventilator settings.

Outcome Measurements

Respiratory outcomes included total blood gas per infant adjusted for mechanical ventilation duration, percentage of extreme blood gas measurements/infant, bias between simultaneous PtcCO2 and blood gas PCO2 values, and bias outside ±7 mm Hg. Blood gas PCO2 values of ≤35 and ≥70 mm Hg were defined as extreme values because values outside of these ranges would generally result in intervention at our institution, irrespective of the infant's pH or clinical status. Based on previous literature we chose ±7 mm Hg as a clinically acceptable bias.5,13–15 Clinical outcomes were culture-proven sepsis before (early onset) and after (late onset) 3 days of life; ≥Grade III intraventricular hemorrhage; bronchopulmonary dysplasia, defined as respiratory support or oxygen requirement at 36 weeks gestation (for neonates born <32 weeks) or at 28 days of life (for infants ≥32 weeks gestation at birth); necrotizing enterocolitis classified as ≥Bells stage II, including spontaneous intestinal perforation; patent ductus arteriosus diagnosed by echocardiogram or clinically and treated; and type 1 retinopathy of prematurity by ETROP (Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity) criteria.16

Analysis

Demographic and clinical outcomes of the 2 cohorts were compared using the Fisher exact test, chi-square test, Student t test, and Mann-Whitney test as appropriate. Infants requiring high-frequency ventilation were identified for subgroup analysis a priori. Poisson regression with overdispersion correction and offsetting for duration of mechanical ventilation was used to analyze the effect of PtcCO2 monitor use on blood gas frequency when adjusting for confounders determined on bivariate analysis. We calculated the fraction of extreme values for individual subjects and averaged those values to give us proportions for the entire cohort to account for repeated measurements. After removing PtcCO2 values of <15 or >100 as outliers (n = 23 observations), we analyzed 1,338 simultaneous PtcCO2 and blood gas PCO2 values. Bias was calculated as the mm Hg difference between simultaneous PtcCO2 and blood gas PCO2 measurements. The agreement between simultaneous PtcCO2 and blood gas PCO2 values was analyzed using a Bland-Altman plot for repeated measurements per subject with varying true values for each observation, and MedCalc 12.7.5 (MedCalc Software, Ostend, Belgium) was used to generate the plot. To account for repeated measurements in the same subject, we calculated the fraction of values for individual subjects within each bias range (±5, ±7, ±10, and ±15 mm Hg) and averaged those values to give us proportions for the entire cohort. Bivariate analysis of clinical factors associated with a bias outside ±7 mm Hg was explored, and a generalized estimating equations model was used to generate an adjusted model. All analysis other than specified was done using SAS 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina).

Results

Frequency and Range of Blood Gas Measurements

Derivation of the study population is outlined in Figure 1. There were no significant differences in the admission characteristics and initial management between the 2 cohorts (Table 1). Median blood gas frequency per day of mechanical ventilation per infant was significantly lower in the post-PtcCO2 period. The decrease in blood gas frequency was greater among the subset of infants who required high-frequency ventilation (jet or oscillatory ventilation) at any time (Table 2). Birthweight, gestational age, low admission temperature <36°C, use of PtcCO2 monitoring, and high-frequency ventilation were significantly related to total number of blood gases for a subject in the bivariate analysis using Poisson regression when offsetting for duration of mechanical ventilation. In the multivariate model, adjusting for these variables and offsetting for mechanical ventilation duration, use of PtcCO2 monitors remained significantly associated with reduced blood gases along with the use of high-frequency ventilation (Table 3). The post-PtcCO2 cohort on average had a lower percentage of extreme values at 17.8 ± 8.4% than the pre-PtcCO2 cohort with 19.4 ± 8.7%, but this difference was not significant (Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1.

Clinical Characteristics of Infants in the Pre-PtcCO2 and Post-PtcCO2 Periods

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 2.

Neonatal Blood Gas Comparison and Clinical Outcome of the 2 Cohorts (N = 123; Blood Gas Measurements = 5,726)

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 3.

Incidence Rate Ratios for Total Number of Gases by Bivariate and Multivariate Poisson Regression When Offsetting for Duration of Mechanical Ventilation

Clinical Outcomes

There were no significant differences in the duration of mechanical ventilation or use of rescue high-frequency ventilation in the 2 cohorts. The clinical outcomes measured at the time for hospital discharge between the 2 cohorts were also not significantly different (Table 2).

Blood Gas PCO2 and PtcCO2 Measure Agreement

We analyzed 1,338 simultaneous PtcCO2 and blood gas measurements from 52 subjects in the post-PtcCO2 cohort. Using a Bland-Altman plot for multiple measurements, we found mean ± 2 SD bias of −5.2 ± 17.3 (Fig. 2). Subgroup analysis using only arterial blood gas values included 774 paired samples and found a mean bias ± 2 SD of −7.2 ± 16. An average of 51.4 ± 21.5% of paired measurements had bias within ±5 mm Hg; 64 ± 20.6% within ±7 mm Hg; 78 ± 17.6% within ±10 mm Hg; and 92 ± 10.3% within ±15 mm Hg. On bivariate analysis, increasing birthweight, increasing blood gas measurements, high-frequency ventilation at the time of blood gas measure, and arterial sample were significant predictors of a bias outside ±7 mm Hg (Table 4). In the multivariable model, when adjusting for birthweight and blood gas number, being on high-frequency ventilation at the time of the blood gas measurement and having an arterial sample continued to significantly increase the odds of a bias ±7 mm Hg (Table 4). There was no significant relationship of sex, gestational age at birth, or chronological age of the infant at the time of the blood gas measurement.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Bland-Altman plot for multiple measurements of 52 subjects with 1,338 simultaneous blood gas - PtcCO2 measurements. Multiple measurements for each subjects are depicted by a unique shape. The center horizontal line depicts the mean, and outside dotted lines show ±SD.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 4.

Adjusted Odds Ratios for Factors Contributing to Blood Gas-PtcCO2 Bias Greater Than ±7 mm Hg

Excluded Population

Of the 76 eligible infants in the post-PtcCO2 period, 24 were excluded, per study criteria, due to <50% use of PtcCO2 monitoring for the duration of mechanical ventilation. To account for selection bias, we compared the demographics and clinical characteristics of neonates excluded with those of neonates included and found that PtcCO2 monitor use <50% of mechanical ventilation time was associated with shorter median mechanical ventilation time (5.4 [interquartile range 3.7–14.3] days vs 8.7 [interquartile range 5.6–22.1] days, P = .027), lower surfactant use (87.5% vs 100%, P = .028) and high-frequency ventilation use (16.7% vs 55.8%, P = .002), suggesting a healthier group. Other clinical characteristics were comparable (see Supplementary Table 1 at http://www.rcjournal.com).

Discussion

In this study, we found that use of PtcCO2 monitors in the NICU did not increase and in fact reduced the frequency of blood gas sampling despite only moderate agreement (Tables 2 and 3). PtcCO2 monitor use could have had no impact on the frequency of blood gas sampling if clinicians did not trust the PtcCO2 output; conversely, the continuous display of (potentially abnormal) PtcCO2 output could have prompted more sampling if clinicians felt obliged to obtain confirmatory blood gases. However, we found that among the infants for whom PtcCO2 monitoring was used ≥50% of the mechanical ventilation time, the addition of PtcCO2 monitoring technology reduced blood gases. This finding was robust when controlling for demographic characteristics and markers of severity of respiratory illness over 2 time periods and within the subgroup of infants requiring high-frequency ventilation (Tables 2 and 3). The clinical impact of this reduction in terms of blood loss is possibly minor, and the absence of a larger difference is possibly related to the wide agreement. We found no difference in frequency of arterial line insertion, type of arterial line (umbilical vs peripheral), or blood transfusions in the 2 cohorts (Tables 1 and 2). Transcutaneous devices, which reduce the need for needle sticks, have been cited as a mode for decreasing pain in the care of newborns.17 In the current study, we were unable to obtain frequency of needle sticks in the cohorts. The impact of reduced blood gas frequency on acute and chronic pain scores when considering manipulation needed to apply PtcCO2 monitors remains to be explored.

The availability of a continuous display of CO2 levels could have hastened corrective changes to ventilator parameters before the values drifted to extreme levels. However, the percentage of extreme values in the 2 cohorts was not significantly different. Using blood gas PCO2 as a marker of PCO2 fluctuations is biased by the fact that blood gas PCO2 values in the abnormal range trigger more blood gases, whereas the absence of out-of-range values in another subject may merely reflect fewer tests. We partly adjusted for this by dividing the number of extreme values by the total blood gas number per infant. Our small sample size may also be insufficient to detect a statistically significant difference. Prospective timed sampling of infants with and without PtcCO2 monitoring would be needed to demonstrate variability with more precision.

Our study demonstrates that PtcCO2 monitoring is a reliable source of clinical information in most, but not all, critically ill neonates. 64% of values had a bias within ±7 mm Hg. We also found wider agreement limits of 12.2 to −22.5 compared with some prior studies.4,5,13,14 Our study, however, evaluates a large blood gas-PtcCO2 sample over the entire span of an infant's ventilated course, making fluctuation in agreement more likely. Further, >80% of our population is constituted by very low birthweight infants, in whom a lower correlation has been reported, compared with pediatric and adult studies.2 Of note, it is likely that despite the moderate agreement, the reduction in blood gas frequency was due to the use of the PtcCO2 values as a trend rather than as a point in time measure.

We investigated variables associated with wide blood gas-PtcCO2 agreement. Most studies previously reporting agreement have used arterial blood gases, which is the accepted standard.2,4,14 Recently, good correlation was also reported between PtcCO2 measurements and venous samples among pediatric subjects.11 In our study, 41% of simultaneous PtcCO2 and blood gas values were capillary samples. A survey of 39 NICUs in Europe reported that 49% of units used capillary gases to calibrate PtcCO2 measurements.7 There is no information on the agreement of PtcCO2 with capillary gases, which, although not the accepted standard, are frequently used in practice. We found that PtcCO2 values agree better with capillary blood samples than arterial (Table 4). This is perhaps not surprising, given that the PtcCO2 monitor senses CO2 diffusion from heated capillary beds and possibly conveys the same difference that capillary gases demonstrate from simultaneous arterial gases. We adjusted for the infant's age (because arterial samples are likely to be obtained earlier in the infant's care when umbilical arterial lines are present and respiratory status is evolving) and mode of ventilation. Arterial blood gases remained associated with greater bias than capillary samples. We also found significant associations with the use of high-frequency ventilation and bias greater than ±7 (Table 4). High-frequency ventilation is largely used as a rescue mode of ventilation in our center, and therefore blood PCO2 levels tend to be higher before high-frequency ventilation is initiated, which can cause wider agreement limits. Sicker infants on high-frequency ventilation possibly have differences in peripheral perfusion that we could not quantify in this study.

Finally, we addressed the impact of PtcCO2 monitoring on infant outcomes. More frequent ventilator changes could impact infants in a positive manner by better control of CO2 or could simply lead to more interventions for inaccurate reads that negatively impacted outcomes. We found no difference in major clinical or respiratory outcomes (Table 2). Our findings are, however, limited by our sample size, which was not powered for the individual clinical outcomes. A prospective, randomized, and blinded study of infants clinically managed with and without PtcCO2 monitoring would be needed to accurately assess whether the use of PtcCO2 monitors influences ventilator control and clinical outcomes in neonates.

Our study is limited by its retrospective, observational design based on a single center experience. We focused on sick NICU infants requiring mechanical ventilation for >48 h, including a heterogeneous array of pathologies ranging from extreme prematurity to meconium aspiration in term infants. We selected this group to reflect a NICU population where the use of a PtcCO2 monitor could have most impact. Our results are therefore best generalizable to this population. We excluded 24 infants in the post-PtcCO2 period because they spent <50% of their mechanical ventilation time on PtcCO2 monitors. This exclusion criterion was designed a priori to limit inclusion of infants where PtcCO2 monitor use was insufficient to have a conceivable impact. We found no significant demographic differences when we compared these infants with those who did have PtcCO2 monitor use ≥50% of the ventilated time, although significantly reduced surfactant need, mechanical ventilation duration, and high-frequency ventilation use suggest that the infants with <50% of ventilated time on PtcCO2 monitors were less severely ill (see Supplementary Table 1). We could not completely ascertain why these infants spent <50% of ventilated time on PtcCO2 monitors. Chart review suggests that in some cases, an initial lack of correlation led to early abandonment of the technology; in others, rapid clinical improvement may have led to the idea that it was not needed; but in many cases no reason could be determined. This exclusion criterion was designed to reflect real-life practice, and we recognize that it probably selected for infants in whom care providers identified PtcCO2 monitors to correlate better. The pre-post cohort design limits our ability to account for secular trends. Although this limitation cannot be resolved completely, the proximity of the time periods studied, absence of any major NICU respiratory management policy changes during the time, and comparable demographics of the infants minimize the impact of this limitation on the results of the study.

Conclusions

PtcCO2 monitoring is used in clinical practice with moderate correlation in most neonates over a range of gestational ages, disease pathology, and modes of ventilation. In clinical practice, when used consistently, PtcCO2 monitors were associated with decreased blood gas sampling but no significant change in ventilatory control or major morbidities. Further study is needed to determine how to optimally employ this noninvasive monitoring technique, potentially to decrease phlebotomy-associated blood loss and increase the safety of mechanical ventilation.

Footnotes

  • Correspondence: Sagori Mukhopadhyay, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Newborn Care at Pennsylvania Hospital, 800 Spruce Street, 2nd Floor, Cathcart Building, Philadelphia, PA 19107. E-mail: Mukhopadhs{at}email.chop.edu.
  • Supplementary material related to this paper is available at http://www.rcjournal.com.

  • Dr Mukhopadhyay presented a version of this paper at the Pediatric Academic Society Annual Meeting, held April 25–28, 2015, in San Diego, California.

  • The authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

  • Copyright © 2016 by Daedalus Enterprises

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    1. Widness JA,
    2. Madan A,
    3. Grindeanu LA,
    4. Zimmerman MB,
    5. Wong DK,
    6. Stevenson DK
    . Reduction in red blood cell transfusions among preterm infants: Results of a randomized trial with an in-line blood gas and chemistry monitor. Pediatrics 2005;115(5):1299–306.
  2. 2.
    1. Aliwalas LL,
    2. Noble L,
    3. Nesbitt K,
    4. Fallah S,
    5. Shah V,
    6. Shah PS
    . Agreement of carbon dioxide levels measured by arterial, transcutaneous and end tidal methods in preterm infants < or = 28 weeks gestation. J Perinatol 2005;25(1):26–29.
  3. 3.
    1. Berkenbosch JW,
    2. Tobias JD
    . Transcutaneous carbon dioxide monitoring during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in infants and children. Crit Care Med 2002;30(5):1024–1027.
  4. 4.
    1. Sandberg KL,
    2. Brynjarsson H,
    3. Hjalmarson O
    . Transcutaneous blood gas monitoring during neonatal intensive care. Acta Paediatr 2011;100(5):676–679.
  5. 5.
    1. Tingay DG,
    2. Stewart MJ,
    3. Morley CJ
    . Monitoring of end tidal carbon dioxide and transcutaneous carbon dioxide during neonatal transport. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005;90(6):F523–F526.
  6. 6.
    1. Bernet V,
    2. Döll C,
    3. Cannizzaro V,
    4. Ersch J,
    5. Frey B,
    6. Weiss M
    . Longtime performance and reliability of two different PtcCO2 and SpO2 sensors in neonates. Paediatr Anaesth 2008;18(9):872–877.
  7. 7.
    1. Rüdiger M,
    2. Töpfer K,
    3. Hammer H,
    4. Schmalisch G,
    5. Wauer RR
    . A survey of transcutaneous blood gas monitoring among european neonatal intensive care units. BMC Pediatr 2005;5:30.
  8. 8.
    1. Urbano J,
    2. Cruzado V,
    3. López-Herce J,
    4. del Castillo J,
    5. Bellón JM,
    6. Carrillo A
    . Accuracy of three transcutaneous carbon dioxide monitors in critically ill children. Pediatr Pulmonol 2010;45(5):481–486.
  9. 9.
    1. Cassady G
    . Transcutaneous monitoring in the newborn infant. J Pediatr 1983;103(6):837–848.
  10. 10.
    1. Hejlesen OK,
    2. Cichosz SL,
    3. Vangsgaard S,
    4. Andresen MF,
    5. Madsen LP
    . Clinical implications of a quality assessment of transcutaneous CO2 monitoring in preterm infants in neonatal intensive care. Stud Health Technol Inform 2009;150:490–494.
  11. 11.
    1. Gal S,
    2. Riskin A,
    3. Chistyakov I,
    4. Shifman N,
    5. Srugo I,
    6. Kugelman A
    . Transcutaneous PCO2 monitoring in infants hospitalized with viral bronchiolitis. Eur J Pediatr. 2015;174(3):319–324.
  12. 12.
    1. Restrepo RD,
    2. Hirst KR,
    3. Wittnebel L,
    4. Wettstein R
    . AARC clinical practice guideline: Transcutaneous monitoring of carbon dioxide and oxygen: 2012. Respir Care 2012;57(11):1955–1962.
  13. 13.
    1. Tingay DG,
    2. Mun KS,
    3. Perkins EJ
    . End tidal carbon dioxide is as reliable as transcutaneous monitoring in ventilated postsurgical neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2013;98(2):F161–F164.
  14. 14.
    1. Storre JH,
    2. Magnet FS,
    3. Dreher M,
    4. Windisch W
    . Transcutaneous monitoring as a replacement for arterial PCO2 monitoring during nocturnal non-invasive ventilation. Respir Med 2011;105(1):143–150.
  15. 15.
    1. Cox M,
    2. Kemp R,
    3. Anwar S,
    4. Athey V,
    5. Aung T,
    6. Moloney ED
    . Non-invasive monitoring of CO2 levels in patients using NIV for AECOPD. Thorax 2006;61(4):363–364.
  16. 16.
    Early Treatment For Retinopathy Of Prematurity Cooperative Group. Revised indications for the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity: results of the early treatment for retinopathy of prematurity randomized trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121(12):1684–1694.
  17. 17.
    1. Batton DG,
    2. Barrington KJ,
    3. Wallman C
    American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn, American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Surgery, Canadian Paediatric Society Fetus and Newborn Committee, Batton DG, Barrington KJ, Wallman C. Prevention and management of pain in the neonate: an update. Pediatrics 2006;118(5):2231–2241.

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Reprints/Permissions

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire