Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Call for Abstracts
    • 2022 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Call for Abstracts
    • 2022 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Contributions

The Delivery of Chlorofluorocarbon-Propelled Versus Hydrofluoroalkane-Propelled Beclomethasone Dipropionate Aerosol to the Mechanically Ventilated Patient: A Laboratory Study

Jolyon P Mitchell, Mark W Nagel, Kimberly J Wiersema, Cathy C Doyle and Vladimir A Migounov
Respiratory Care November 2003, 48 (11) 1025-1032;
Jolyon P Mitchell
Trudell Medical International, London, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Mark W Nagel
Trudell Medical International, London, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kimberly J Wiersema
Trudell Medical International, London, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cathy C Doyle
Trudell Medical International, London, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vladimir A Migounov
3M Pharmaceuticals, London, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

We describe a laboratory investigation comparing the delivery of chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)- and hydrofluoroalkane (HFA)-formulated beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) by metered-dose inhaler and holding chamber (AeroChamber HC MV) in a simulation of a mechanically ventilated adult patient.

METHODS: We equipped each HC MV (n = 5) with an 8.0 mm diameter endotracheal tube (ETT), locating the HC MV in the inspiratory limb of a breathing circuit linked to a mechanical ventilator set to simulate tidal breathing at tidal volume = 830 mL, respiratory rate = 15 breaths/min, inspiratory-expiratory ratio of 1:2.1, peak inspiratory pressure = 20 cm H2O. Temperature and humidity settings were 35±1°C and 100% relative humidity (close to body conditions). We compared delivery of 5-actuations of CFC- and HFA-BDP (both 50 μg/actuation), measuring total emitted mass captured by a filter at the distal end of the ETT. In a separate study, we inserted the distal end of the ETT within the entry cone of a cascade impactor so that the aerosol particle size distribution could be determined with the circuit at similar environmental conditions as described previously. We made benchmark measurements with circuit temperature and humidity at room ambient conditions (21±1°C and 54±5% RH respectively).

RESULTS: Total emitted mass (5 measurements/device) was significantly greater for HFA-BDP (14.1±1.1 μg/actuation) compared with CFC-BDP (2.4±0.8 μg/actuation) (paired t test, p < 0.001). More HFA-BDP (2.7±0.2 μg/actuation) was lost from the delivery system during exhalation (0.9±0.4 μg/actuation for CFC-BDP) (p < 0.001). The mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) increased from 1.2 μm (room ambient) to 2.8 μm (higher temperature and humidity conditions) for HFA-BDP. In contrast, MMAD for CFC-BDP remained close to 4.6 μm under either condition, but particles finer than about 4.0 μm increased in size when the circuit was saturated.

CONCLUSIONS: Total emitted mass for HFA-BDP was increased by a factor of 5.8 compared with CFC-BDP, due largely to the finer particle size distribution of the HFA-based solution formulation. Additional water vapor required to operate the breathing circuit at close to body conditions resulted in fine particle growth with both formulations.

  • mechanical ventilation
  • aerosol
  • beclomethasone dipropionate
  • chlorofluorocarbon
  • hydrofluoroalkane

Footnotes

  • Correspondence: Jolyon P Mitchell PhD C Chem, Trudell Medical International, 725 Third Street, London, Ontario, N5V 5G4, Canada. E-mail: jmitchell{at}trudellmed.com.
  • Copyright © 2003 by Daedalus Enterprises Inc.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 48 (11)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 48, Issue 11
1 Nov 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author

 

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Delivery of Chlorofluorocarbon-Propelled Versus Hydrofluoroalkane-Propelled Beclomethasone Dipropionate Aerosol to the Mechanically Ventilated Patient: A Laboratory Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Delivery of Chlorofluorocarbon-Propelled Versus Hydrofluoroalkane-Propelled Beclomethasone Dipropionate Aerosol to the Mechanically Ventilated Patient: A Laboratory Study
Jolyon P Mitchell, Mark W Nagel, Kimberly J Wiersema, Cathy C Doyle, Vladimir A Migounov
Respiratory Care Nov 2003, 48 (11) 1025-1032;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
The Delivery of Chlorofluorocarbon-Propelled Versus Hydrofluoroalkane-Propelled Beclomethasone Dipropionate Aerosol to the Mechanically Ventilated Patient: A Laboratory Study
Jolyon P Mitchell, Mark W Nagel, Kimberly J Wiersema, Cathy C Doyle, Vladimir A Migounov
Respiratory Care Nov 2003, 48 (11) 1025-1032;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Keywords

  • mechanical ventilation
  • aerosol
  • beclomethasone dipropionate
  • chlorofluorocarbon
  • hydrofluoroalkane

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire