Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Call for Abstracts
    • 2022 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Call for Abstracts
    • 2022 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Contributions

Measurement of a Baseline Minute Ventilation for the Calculation of Minute Ventilation Recovery Time: Is a Subjective Method Reliable?

Christopher W Seymour, Jason D Christie, Christina Gaughan and Barry D Fuchs
Respiratory Care April 2005, 50 (4) 468-472;
Christopher W Seymour
Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jason D Christie
Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christina Gaughan
University of Pennsylvania Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barry D Fuchs
Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Minute ventilation recovery time is a new predictor of extubation outcome that uses a subjective method for the determination of baseline minute ventilation (V̇E) during its measurement. The purpose of the current study is to evaluate the inter-rater reliability of this subjective method for determining baseline V̇E.

METHODS: Three critical-care physicians served as independent readers. Each was trained with 5 practice V̇E trends, using the published method for determining baseline V̇E, defined as the lowest, stable nadir lasting 15–30 min prior to the final weaning trial before extubation. Readers then determined baseline V̇E prospectively from an 8-hour V̇E trend for 19 patients who were weaning from mechanical ventilation in the surgical intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital. Each V̇E trend was an objective recording of V̇E every 15 min for 8 hours, immediately prior to the final weaning trial before extubation.

RESULTS: There was excellent inter-rater reliability between trained readers for determination of a subjective V̇E baseline. Baseline V̇E was within 1 L/min for 15/19 patients (79%). Intra-class correlation across the 3 readers was 0.92 (p < 0.01). Tukey's test revealed no significant variability between readers (p > 0.5), and Spearman correlations between all reader pairs were significant (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION: After minimal training, readers can reliably determine a subjective baseline V̇E. This study validates the original methodology for determining baseline V̇E, an essential step in the measurement of minute ventilation recovery time.

  • minute ventilation
  • extubation
  • spontaneous breathing trial
  • monitoring
  • weaning
  • mechanical ventilation

Footnotes

  • Correspondence: Barry D Fuchs MD, Medical Intensive Care Units and Respiratory Care, Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Division, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 9.066 Founders Building, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia PA 19104–4283. E-mail: barry.fuchs{at}uphs.upenn.edu.
  • Copyright © 2005 by Daedalus Enterprises Inc.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 50 (4)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 50, Issue 4
1 Apr 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author

 

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Measurement of a Baseline Minute Ventilation for the Calculation of Minute Ventilation Recovery Time: Is a Subjective Method Reliable?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Measurement of a Baseline Minute Ventilation for the Calculation of Minute Ventilation Recovery Time: Is a Subjective Method Reliable?
Christopher W Seymour, Jason D Christie, Christina Gaughan, Barry D Fuchs
Respiratory Care Apr 2005, 50 (4) 468-472;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Measurement of a Baseline Minute Ventilation for the Calculation of Minute Ventilation Recovery Time: Is a Subjective Method Reliable?
Christopher W Seymour, Jason D Christie, Christina Gaughan, Barry D Fuchs
Respiratory Care Apr 2005, 50 (4) 468-472;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Keywords

  • minute ventilation
  • extubation
  • spontaneous breathing trial
  • monitoring
  • weaning
  • mechanical ventilation

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire