Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Open Forum
    • 2023 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Open Forum
    • 2023 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Contributions

The Effects of Apparatus Dead Space on PaCO2 in Patients Receiving Lung-Protective Ventilation

Carl R Hinkson, Michael S Benson, Lauri M Stephens and Steven Deem
Respiratory Care October 2006, 51 (10) 1140-1144;
Carl R Hinkson
Department of Respiratory Care, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
RRT
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Michael S Benson
Department of Respiratory Care, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
RRT
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lauri M Stephens
Department of Respiratory Care, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
RRT
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven Deem
Departments of Anesthesiology and Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lung-protective ventilation using tidal volume (VT) of 4–6 mL/kg (predicted body weight) reduces mortality (compared with traditional VT) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute lung injury. Standardized use of lower VT can result in respiratory acidosis and has raised new concerns about the appropriate configuration of the ventilator circuit, especially in regard to the dead space (VD) of the apparatus. We hypothesized that, with a patient receiving lung-protective ventilation, the removal of all apparatus dead space from the circuit would reduce PaCO2 and allow a reduction in minute ventilation.

METHODS: All the studied patients met the American-European consensus-conference criteria for acute respiratory distress syndrome/acute lung injury, were receiving a lung-protective ventilation strategy, were > 18 years of age, and were hemodynamically stable. We prospectively tested 3 different ventilator-circuit configurations, in random sequence, for 15 min each: (1) standard hygroscopic heat-and-moisture exchanger (HME) with 15-cm flexible tubing, (2) 15-cm flexible tubing only, (3) no HME or flexible tubing. VT, respiratory rate, positive end-expiratory pressure, and fraction of inspired oxygen were maintained constant throughout the study, and exhaled CO2 was measured continuously. Physiologic dead space (VD/VT) was calculated using the Enghoff modification of the Bohr equation.

RESULTS: Seven patients were studied. Removal of the HME from the circuit significantly decreased VD/VT (by approximately 6%) and PaCO2 (by approximately 5 mm Hg). Removal of both the HME and flexible tubing from the circuit reduced VD/VT by an additional 5%, and PaCO2 by an additional 6 mm Hg. With both circuit-configuration changes, minute ventilation fell from a mean of 11.51 L/min to 10.35 L/min, and pH increased from 7.30 to 7.38. Carbondioxide production did not change significantly.

CONCLUSION: In patients receiving lower-VT ventilation, removing all the apparatus VD from the ventilator circuit reduces PaCO2 and increases pH, at a lower minute ventilation. This information will help guide ventilator-circuit configuration for patients receiving lungprotective ventilation.

  • acute respiratory distress syndrome
  • ARDS
  • dead space
  • lung-protective ventilation
  • mechanical ventilation
  • hypercapnia

Footnotes

  • Correspondence: Carl R Hinkson RRT, Respiratory Care, Harborview Medical Center, Mail Stop 359761, 325 9th Avenue, Seattle WA 98104. E-mail: gooddog{at}u.washington.edu.
  • Carl R Hinkson RRT presented a version of this paper at the 51st International Respiratory Congress of the American Association for Respiratory Care, held December 3-6, 2005, in San Antonio, Texas.

  • Copyright © 2006 by Daedalus Enterprises Inc.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 51 (10)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 51, Issue 10
1 Oct 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author

 

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Effects of Apparatus Dead Space on PaCO2 in Patients Receiving Lung-Protective Ventilation
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Effects of Apparatus Dead Space on PaCO2 in Patients Receiving Lung-Protective Ventilation
Carl R Hinkson, Michael S Benson, Lauri M Stephens, Steven Deem
Respiratory Care Oct 2006, 51 (10) 1140-1144;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
The Effects of Apparatus Dead Space on PaCO2 in Patients Receiving Lung-Protective Ventilation
Carl R Hinkson, Michael S Benson, Lauri M Stephens, Steven Deem
Respiratory Care Oct 2006, 51 (10) 1140-1144;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Keywords

  • acute respiratory distress syndrome
  • ARDS
  • dead space
  • lung-protective ventilation
  • mechanical ventilation
  • hypercapnia

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire