Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Call for Abstracts
    • 2022 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Call for Abstracts
    • 2022 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Contributions

Laboratory Evaluation of the Vortran Automatic Resuscitator Model RTM

Mark D Babic, Robert L Chatburn and James K Stoller
Respiratory Care December 2007, 52 (12) 1718-1727;
Mark D Babic
Section of Respiratory Therapy, Department of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Robert L Chatburn
Section of Respiratory Therapy, Department of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Cleveland Clinic.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James K Stoller
Section of Respiratory Therapy, Department of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Cleveland Clinic.
Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One device that has been proposed to address the need for emergency ventilation is the Vortran Automatic Resuscitator.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that increasing load (ie, increasing resistance or decreasing compliance) significantly affects minute alveolar ventilation.

METHODS: A Vortran Automatic Resuscitator was connected to a passive lung model and we measured load with 8 combinations of 4 compliances (14, 28, 46, and 63 mL/cm H2O) and 2 resistances (20 and 42 cm H2O/L/s). Source gas flow was either 20 or 40 L/min. We measured tidal volume (VT), frequency, inspiratory time, expiratory time, peak inspiratory pressure, and intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure. We calculated the ratio of inspiratory time to total cycle time (TI/Ttot), minute ventilation, minute alveolar ventilation, and estimated PaCO2. Raw data were summarized with descriptive statistics. A subset of the experimental data (outcome measures for conditions with high and low values for resistance, compliance, and source gas flow) was analyzed with a 2-level factorial design, with standard “design of experiments” procedure, including analysis of variance. Differences associated with p values ≤ 0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS: Assuming the model lung represented a 68-kg adult, the measured VT ranged from a low of 1.7 mL/kg to a high of 16.7 mL/kg. TI/Ttot was greatly affected by the input flow. At 40 L/min the average TI/Ttot was 30%, and at 20 L/min TI/Ttot was 52%. As the load increased, VT decreased and frequency increased. However, neither the minute ventilation nor the minute alveolar ventilation stayed constant. Minute ventilation ranged from 5.2 L/min to 11.3 L/min at 40 L/min source flow. More importantly, minute alveolar ventilation ranged from zero to 9.8 L/min, resulting in a calculated PaCO2 range of over 100 mm Hg to 16 mm Hg, respectively. Indeed, calculated PaCO2 was never in the normal range (35–45 mm Hg). “Design of experiments” analysis showed that VT was affected by compliance and resistance (p < 0.001 and p < 0.05, respectively). Frequency was affected only by compliance (p < 0.001). Minute alveolar ventilation was affected by compliance and resistance (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively). Minute alveolar ventilation increases as compliance increases and/or resistance decreases, but these variables were essentially independent.

CONCLUSIONS: The Vortran Automatic Resuscitator showed an automatic increase in frequency and decrease in VT that resulted in inappropriate levels of minute alveolar ventilation over a range of compliance and resistance values expected in paralyzed patients ventilated for respiratory failure. The variable performance under changing load, along with the lack of alarms, should prompt caution in using the Vortran Automatic Resuscitator for emergency ventilatory support in situations where the patient cannot be constantly monitored by trained and experienced operators.

  • disaster
  • ventilator
  • design of experiments
  • ventilator load
  • lung model
  • disaster preparedness
  • alveolar minute ventilation
  • continuous spontaneous ventilation

Footnotes

  • Correspondence: Mark D Babic RRT, Respiratory Care Services, Fairview Hospital, 18101 Lorain Avenue, Cleveland OH 44111. E-mail: babicm2{at}ccf.org.
  • Dr Stoller is on the medical advisory board of Respironics, Murrysville, Pennsylvania. The authors report no other conflict of interest in the content of this paper.

  • Copyright © 2007 by Daedalus Enterprises Inc.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 52 (12)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 52, Issue 12
1 Dec 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author

 

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Laboratory Evaluation of the Vortran Automatic Resuscitator Model RTM
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Laboratory Evaluation of the Vortran Automatic Resuscitator Model RTM
Mark D Babic, Robert L Chatburn, James K Stoller
Respiratory Care Dec 2007, 52 (12) 1718-1727;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Laboratory Evaluation of the Vortran Automatic Resuscitator Model RTM
Mark D Babic, Robert L Chatburn, James K Stoller
Respiratory Care Dec 2007, 52 (12) 1718-1727;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Keywords

  • disaster
  • ventilator
  • design of experiments
  • ventilator load
  • lung model
  • disaster preparedness
  • alveolar minute ventilation
  • continuous spontaneous ventilation

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire