Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Call for Abstracts
    • 2022 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Call for Abstracts
    • 2022 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Contributions

The Impact of Imposed Expiratory Resistance in Neonatal Mechanical Ventilation: A Laboratory Evaluation

Robert M Diblasi, John W Salyer, Jay C Zignego, Gregory J Redding and C Peter Richardson
Respiratory Care November 2008, 53 (11) 1450-1460;
Robert M Diblasi
Respiratory Care Department, Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
Center for Developmental Therapeutics, Seattle Children's Hospital Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
John W Salyer
Respiratory Care Department, Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Jay C Zignego
Center for Developmental Therapeutics, Seattle Children's Hospital Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Gregory J Redding
Center for Developmental Therapeutics, Seattle Children's Hospital Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
C Peter Richardson
Center for Developmental Therapeutics, Seattle Children's Hospital Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Small endotracheal tubes (ETTs) and neonatal ventilators can impact gas exchange, work of breathing, and lung-mechanics measurements in infants, by increasing the expiratory resistance (RE) to gas flow.

METHODS: We tested two each of the Babylog 8000plus, Avea, Carestation, and Servo-i ventilators. In the first phase of the study we evaluated (1) the imposed RE of an ETT and ventilator system during simulated passive breathing at various tidal volume (VT), positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), and frequency settings, and (2) the intrinsic PEEP at various ventilator settings. In the second phase of this study we evaluated the imposed expiratory work of breathing (WOB) of the ETT and ventilator system at various PEEP levels during simulated spontaneous breathing using an infant lung model. Pressure and flow were measured continuously, and we calculated the imposed RE of the ETT and each ventilator, and the intrinsic PEEP with various PEEP, VT, and frequency settings. We measured the imposed expiratory WOB with several PEEP levels during a simulated spontaneous breathing pattern.

RESULTS: The ventilator's contribution to the imposed RE was greater than that of the ETT with nearly all of the ventilators tested. There were significant differences in ventilator-imposed RE between the ventilator brands at various PEEP, VT, and frequency settings. The Babylog 8000plus consistently had the lowest ventilator-imposed RE in the majority of the test conditions. There was no intrinsic PEEP (> 1 cm H2O) in any of the test conditions with any ventilator brand. There were also no significant differences in the imposed expiratory WOB between ventilator brands during simulated spontaneous breathing.

CONCLUSIONS: The major cause of RE appears to be the ventilator exhalation valve. Neonatal ventilators that use a set constant flow during inhalation and exhalation appear to have less RE than ventilators that use a variable bias flow during exhalation. Clinical studies are needed to determine whether the imposed RE of these ventilator designs impacts gas exchange, lung mechanics, or ventilator weaning.

  • airway resistance
  • respiratory mechanics
  • work of breathing
  • positive end-expiratory pressure
  • PEEP
  • neonatal intensive care

Footnotes

  • Correspondence: Robert M DiBlasi RRT-NPS, Seattle Children's Hospital Research Institute, Center for Developmental Therapeutics, 1900 Ninth Avenue, Seattle WA 98101. E-mail: robert.diblasi{at}seattlechildrens.org.
  • Ventilators and technical support for this study were provided by Maquet, GE Healthcare, Draäger, and Cardinal/Viasys. The authors report no other conflicts of interest related to the content of this paper.

  • Copyright © 2008 by Daedalus Enterprises Inc.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 53 (11)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 53, Issue 11
1 Nov 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author

 

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Impact of Imposed Expiratory Resistance in Neonatal Mechanical Ventilation: A Laboratory Evaluation
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Impact of Imposed Expiratory Resistance in Neonatal Mechanical Ventilation: A Laboratory Evaluation
Robert M Diblasi, John W Salyer, Jay C Zignego, Gregory J Redding, C Peter Richardson
Respiratory Care Nov 2008, 53 (11) 1450-1460;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
The Impact of Imposed Expiratory Resistance in Neonatal Mechanical Ventilation: A Laboratory Evaluation
Robert M Diblasi, John W Salyer, Jay C Zignego, Gregory J Redding, C Peter Richardson
Respiratory Care Nov 2008, 53 (11) 1450-1460;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Keywords

  • airway resistance
  • respiratory mechanics
  • Work of Breathing
  • positive end-expiratory pressure
  • PEEP
  • neonatal intensive care

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire