Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Call for Abstracts
    • 2022 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Call for Abstracts
    • 2022 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Contributions

Do Directed Cough Maneuvers Improve Cough Effectiveness in the Early Period After Open Heart Surgery? Effect of Thoracic Support and Maximal Inspiration on Cough Peak Expiratory Flow, Cough Expiratory Volume, and Thoracic Pain

Julio F Fiore, Luciana D Chiavegato, Linda Denehy, Denise M Paisani and Sonia M Faresin
Respiratory Care August 2008, 53 (8) 1027-1034;
Julio F Fiore Jr
Respiratory Department, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Luciana D Chiavegato
Respiratory Department, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Linda Denehy
School of Physiotherapy, University of Melbourne Melbourne, Australia.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Denise M Paisani
Respiratory Department, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sonia M Faresin
Respiratory Department, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Directed cough maneuvers are often included in physiotherapy management aimed at preventing postoperative pulmonary complications after open heart surgery, but there is little scientific evidence of the effectiveness of directed cough maneuvers.

METHODS: We conducted a randomized intra-subject crossover trial to evaluate the effect of thoracic support (patient holds his or her hands over the incision) and maximal inspiration on cough peak expiratory flow (CPEF), cough expiratory volume (CEV), and incision pain during cough in the early period after open heart surgery. Cough evaluation was undertaken on the first and second morning after surgery. On both measurement days the subject did a baseline cough (baseline cough 1) then, in a random sequence, performed 3 cough conditions: an additional baseline cough (baseline cough 2), supported cough, and supported cough preceded by maximal inspiration. In these test conditions a P < .008 was deemed to indicate a statistically significant difference.

RESULTS: Twenty-one subjects participated. Thoracic support alone did not significantly affect CPEF or CEV (Bonferroni adjusted P > .008). With a maximal inspiration and thoracic support, CPEF and CPEV were significantly higher than in all other cough conditions (Bonferroni adjusted P < .008). Pain during cough was not influenced by the different cough conditions (P > .05). There was no significant difference in the cough variables or pain during the different cough conditions on the first day versus the second measurement day.

CONCLUSIONS: Maximal inspiration increased CPEF and CEV, but the method of thoracic support we used did not reduce pain during cough or influence the cough values we measured.

  • cough
  • respiratory physiotherapy
  • cardiac surgery
  • respiratory complications
  • postoperative care
  • postoperative pain

Footnotes

  • Correspondence: Julio F Fiore Jr PT, Respiratory Department, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. E-mail: juliofiore{at}uol.com.br.
  • Julio F Fiore Jr MSc was supported by a scholarship from the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES), Ministry of Education, Brazil.

  • Copyright © 2008 by Daedalus Enterprises Inc.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 53 (8)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 53, Issue 8
1 Aug 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author

 

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Do Directed Cough Maneuvers Improve Cough Effectiveness in the Early Period After Open Heart Surgery? Effect of Thoracic Support and Maximal Inspiration on Cough Peak Expiratory Flow, Cough Expiratory Volume, and Thoracic Pain
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Do Directed Cough Maneuvers Improve Cough Effectiveness in the Early Period After Open Heart Surgery? Effect of Thoracic Support and Maximal Inspiration on Cough Peak Expiratory Flow, Cough Expiratory Volume, and Thoracic Pain
Julio F Fiore, Luciana D Chiavegato, Linda Denehy, Denise M Paisani, Sonia M Faresin
Respiratory Care Aug 2008, 53 (8) 1027-1034;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Do Directed Cough Maneuvers Improve Cough Effectiveness in the Early Period After Open Heart Surgery? Effect of Thoracic Support and Maximal Inspiration on Cough Peak Expiratory Flow, Cough Expiratory Volume, and Thoracic Pain
Julio F Fiore, Luciana D Chiavegato, Linda Denehy, Denise M Paisani, Sonia M Faresin
Respiratory Care Aug 2008, 53 (8) 1027-1034;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Keywords

  • cough
  • respiratory physiotherapy
  • cardiac surgery
  • respiratory complications
  • postoperative care
  • postoperative pain

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire