Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Call for Abstracts
    • 2022 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Call for Abstracts
    • 2022 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

A North American Survey of Respiratory Therapist and Physician Tracheostomy Decannulation Practices

Henry Thomas Stelfox, Dean R Hess and Ulrich H Schmidt
Respiratory Care December 2009, 54 (12) 1658-1664;
Henry Thomas Stelfox
Departments of Critical Care Medicine, Medicine, and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Dean R Hess
Department of Respiratory Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ulrich H Schmidt
Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tracheostomy is a common surgical procedure performed on critically ill patients. However, little is known about how clinicians make decisions to decannulate patients, and whether similar decisions are made by respiratory therapists (RTs) and physicians.

METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional survey of RTs (n = 52) and physicians (n = 102) at 54 medical centers in North America, to characterize contemporary decannulation practices.

RESULTS: RTs and physicians rated ability to tolerate capping, secretions, cough effectiveness, and level of consciousness as the most important factors in the decannulation decision, with RTs placing greater emphasis on ability to tolerate capping and physicians on level of consciousness. In the clinical scenarios, RTs and physicians recommended decannulation with similar frequency (52% vs 55%, P = .54). Patients were most likely to be recommended for decannulation if they had a strong cough, scant thin secretions, required minimal supplemental oxygen, and were alert and interactive. In addition, RTs were more likely to recommend decannulation for patients who demonstrated an ability to tolerate tracheostomy tube capping for 72 hours and whose etiology of respiratory failure was chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. RTs preferred shorter time frames for defining decannulation failure than did physicians (median response 48 h vs 96 h, P = .02 for test of proportions). Both groups identified 2-5% (median response) as an acceptable rate of decannulation failure (P = .48 for test of proportions).

CONCLUSIONS: Important differences exist in the decannulation practices of North American RTs and physicians. Evidence-based tracheostomy guidelines are needed to facilitate the safe and effective management of patients with tracheostomies.

  • tracheostomy
  • tracheotomy
  • critical care
  • intensive care
  • ventilators
  • mechanical
  • respiration
  • artificial
  • decannulation
  • survey

Footnotes

  • Correspondence: Henry Thomas Stelfox MD PhD, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Centre EG23A, 1403 29 Street NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 2T9 Canada. E-mail: tom.stelfox{at}albertahealthservices.ca.
  • Dr Hess has disclosed relationships with Respironics, Impact, and Pari.

  • Drs Stelfox and Schmidt have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

  • Dr Hess presented a version of this paper at the OPEN FORUM of the 53rd International Respiratory Congress of the American Association for Respiratory Care, held December 1-4, 2007, in Orlando, Florida.

  • Copyright © 2009 by Daedalus Enterprises Inc.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 54 (12)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 54, Issue 12
1 Dec 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author

 

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A North American Survey of Respiratory Therapist and Physician Tracheostomy Decannulation Practices
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
A North American Survey of Respiratory Therapist and Physician Tracheostomy Decannulation Practices
Henry Thomas Stelfox, Dean R Hess, Ulrich H Schmidt
Respiratory Care Dec 2009, 54 (12) 1658-1664;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
A North American Survey of Respiratory Therapist and Physician Tracheostomy Decannulation Practices
Henry Thomas Stelfox, Dean R Hess, Ulrich H Schmidt
Respiratory Care Dec 2009, 54 (12) 1658-1664;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Keywords

  • tracheostomy
  • tracheotomy
  • critical care
  • intensive care
  • ventilators
  • mechanical
  • respiration
  • artificial
  • decannulation
  • survey

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire