Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Call for Abstracts
    • 2022 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Call for Abstracts
    • 2022 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
Research ArticleConference Proceedings

Cycling of the Mechanical Ventilator Breath

Michael A Gentile
Respiratory Care January 2011, 56 (1) 52-60; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.01088
Michael A Gentile
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Characteristics of a pressure-supported breath. In this example, the baseline pressure (ie, PEEP) is set at 5 cm H2O, and the pressure support is set at 15 cm H2O. The inspiratory pressure is triggered at point A by a patient effort, resulting in an airway pressure decrease. The rise to pressure (line B) is provided by the initial flow into the airway. If the initial flow is excessive, the initial pressure exceeds the set level (B1). If the initial flow is low, there is a slow rise to pressure (B2). The plateau of pressure support (line C) is maintained by control of flow. A smooth plateau indicates appropriate flow responsiveness to patient demand. Termination of pressure support occurs at point D and should coincide with the end of neural inspiration. If breath termination is delayed, the patient may actively exhale (the pressure rises above the plateau) (D1). If breath termination is premature, the patient may have continued inspiratory efforts (D2). (Adapted from Reference 18, with permission.)

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Effect of respiratory mechanics on cycling of pressure support from inhalation to exhalation. Flow cycling is set at 25% of the peak flow, as illustrated by the broken line. The upper panel represents the respiratory mechanics of a patient with restrictive lung disease. The lower panel represents the respiratory mechanics of a patient with obstructive lung disease. In each case the neural inspiratory time is 1.0 second. The breath terminates prematurely in the patient with restrictive lung disease, but the breath is prolonged in the patient with obstructive lung disease. Also note that the peak flow is greater in restrictive lung disease, and the pressure decrease is more rapid in restrictive lung disease. (Adapted from Reference 19.)

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Lung model waveforms with flow cycling at 10%, 25%, and 50%, with a Puritan Bennett 840 ventilator set on pressure support 15 cm H2O and PEEP of 5 cm H2O. The lung model settings were resistance 5 cm H2O/L/s, compliance 0.05 L/cm H2O. (Adapted from Reference 19.)

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Airway pressure and flow graphics illustrate delayed cycling. A: Normal respiratory mechanics. The cycle setting is 25% of peak inspiratory flow. Cycling is ideal, as indicated by the fact that the inspiratory flow decreases to the 25% cycling level at the end of the patient's neural inspiratory time (TI). B: Obstructive respiratory mechanics. The change in the inspiratory flow curve leads to the 25% level being reached later, well after the end of the neural TI. The duration of delayed cycling is represented by the excess TI. Increasing the cycle setting to 60% of peak inspiratory flow corrects this problem, and cycling occurs at the end of neural TI. Insp = inspiration. Exp = expiration. (Adapted from Reference 22, with permission BioMed Central.)

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    An example of delayed cycling during pressure-support ventilation of a patient with COPD, on a Puritan Bennett 7200 ventilator, which has a flow-termination of 5 L/min during pressure-support ventilation at 12 cm H2O. The ventilator cycles at 18 L/min. The pressure increase above the set pressure-support level causes the ventilator to pressure-cycle in response to the patient's active exhalation. (Adapted from Reference 25.)

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Consequences of delayed cycling. PEEPi = intrinsic PEEP. (Adapted from Reference 22, with permission BioMed Central.)

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Flow, airway pressure, and transversus abdominis electromyogram (EMG) waveforms from a mechanically ventilated patient with COPD receiving pressure-support ventilation at 20 cm H2O. The onset of expiratory muscle activity (vertical dotted line) occurred when mechanical inflation was only partly completed, as indicated by the onset of expiratory muscle activity. Active exhalation caused an increase in airway pressure at end-exhalation, causing the ventilator to pressure-cycle rather than flow-cycle. (Adapted from Reference 29, with permission.)

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 56 (1)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 56, Issue 1
1 Jan 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author

 

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cycling of the Mechanical Ventilator Breath
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Cycling of the Mechanical Ventilator Breath
Michael A Gentile
Respiratory Care Jan 2011, 56 (1) 52-60; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.01088

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Cycling of the Mechanical Ventilator Breath
Michael A Gentile
Respiratory Care Jan 2011, 56 (1) 52-60; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.01088
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Cycling Mechanisms
    • Premature Cycling
    • Delayed Cycling
    • Expiratory Asynchrony
    • Summary
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Keywords

  • asynchrony
  • patient-ventilator interaction
  • pressure-support ventilation
  • cycling criterion
  • expiratory asynchrony
  • premature cycling
  • delayed cycling

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire