Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Call for Abstracts
    • 2022 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Call for Abstracts
    • 2022 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Bench Study of a New Device to Display and Maintain Stable Artificial Airway Cuff Pressure

William R Howard
Respiratory Care October 2011, 56 (10) 1506-1513; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.00961
William R Howard
Department of Respiratory Care, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Artificial airway cuff-inflation device. A: Manometer for continuous display of cuff pressure. B: Gas-sampling line, which connects the cuff-inflation device to the cuff pilot balloon. C: Connection between the cuff-inflation device and the flow-meter outlet. D: Pressure-relief valve adjustment for setting the cuff pressure.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    A: Cuff-inflation device test setup, which includes cuff pilot balloon, cuff-inflation syringe, standard analog pressure gauge, and pressure-calibration analyzer. A syringe and cuff inflator was attached to the endotracheal tube via a stopcock in the check valve at the end of the pilot tube. B: Setup for Part 1 of Test 1. The cuff-inflation device and calibration analyzer were connected via a single stopcock. The cuff-inflation device stopcock was adjusted Port A or Port B communication with the calibration analyzer. This test measured pressure within the cuff-inflation device, and compared this to the pressure delivered at the end of the gas-sampling line. C: The 3 stopcock ports used in the test hub. Port A and Port B are open while Port C is closed.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    The PressureEasy device was added between the pilot balloon and the test hub. It was evaluated for the effect on cuff pressure after adding 5 mL and 10 mL of air to the cuff after baseline inflation.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Analysis of limits of agreement in cuff pressure for 2 cuff-inflation devices. The cuff-inflation-device measurements were compared to simultaneously obtained measurements from the calibration analyzer. The open triangles represent the measurements from one of the tested cuff-inflation devices, and the open diamonds represent the measurements from the other cuff-inflation device. The horizontal axis represents the mean of the arithmetic sum of the values measured with the calibration analyzer and the cuff-inflation device. The vertical axis represents the difference between the 2 measurements (calibration analyzer minus cuff-inflation device). The grey dashed line represents the mean difference, or bias. The black dotted lines represent the precision (± 2 standard deviations from the mean difference).

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Cuff-pressure changes after the addition of 5 mL and 10 mL of air into the cuff of 3 artificial airways, after initial baseline of 30 cm H2O established. The cuff-inflation device was compared to the PressureEasy device and the syringe-inflation method. The first and second bar in each group represent the cuff pressure (from the calibration analyzer) measured after the additional injection of 5 mL and 10 mL of air, with the Sheridan endotracheal tube, the Microcuff endotracheal tube, and the tracheostomy tube.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Analysis of limits of agreement for measurements of exhaled tidal volume with direct patient-circuit connection to the test lung versus cuff inflation of 3 artificial airways with (A) the cuff-inflation device (open triangles) and (B) the syringe-inflation method (open squares). The horizontal axis represents the mean of the arithmetic sum of the values of VT measured with (A) direct patient circuit connect and the cuff-inflation device or (B) direct patient-circuit connection and the syringe-inflation method. The vertical axis represents the difference between the 2 measurements (A: calibration analyzer minus cuff-inflation device, and B: calibration analyzer minus syringe-inflation method). The grey solid line represents the mean difference, or bias. The black dotted lines represent the precision (± 2 standard deviations from the mean).

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 56 (10)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 56, Issue 10
1 Oct 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author

 

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Bench Study of a New Device to Display and Maintain Stable Artificial Airway Cuff Pressure
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Bench Study of a New Device to Display and Maintain Stable Artificial Airway Cuff Pressure
William R Howard
Respiratory Care Oct 2011, 56 (10) 1506-1513; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.00961

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Bench Study of a New Device to Display and Maintain Stable Artificial Airway Cuff Pressure
William R Howard
Respiratory Care Oct 2011, 56 (10) 1506-1513; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.00961
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Keywords

  • artificial airway
  • cuff pressure
  • tracheal damage
  • stenosis
  • tidal volume
  • accidental extubation

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire