Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Call for Abstracts
    • 2022 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Call for Abstracts
    • 2022 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
LetterLetters

Analysis of Acid-Base Disorders in Patients With Chronic Respiratory Failure

Cosimo Marcello Bruno
Respiratory Care March 2011, 56 (3) 366; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.01201
Cosimo Marcello Bruno
Department of Internal Medicine and Systemic Diseases University of Catania Catania, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

In a recent paper published in your prestigious journal, Guérin et al1 examined the acid-base disorders in a cohort of patients with chronic respiratory failure. Although I appreciated their contribution of case studies and statistical analysis, I am in partial disagreement with some of their conclusions.

Guérin et al stratified the patients on the basis of stable versus unstable condition and elevated versus not elevated bicarbonate, and examined acid-base balance according to the Stewart approach, the standardized base excess, and the corrected anion gap. In some of the patients they found non-respiratory disorders detected by strong ion difference but not by bicarbonate value, standardized base excess, and corrected anion gap, and they concluded that the diagnostic performance of the Stewart method was better than the conventional approach.

The reliability of Stewart approach, compared to the traditional method to assess acid-base status, is a debated question.2–5 As is well known, serum bicarbonate is not an independent variable, and in the traditional approach, which is based on the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation, the acid-base status depends on the ratio of HCO3– to PCO2, rather than their individual values. A variation in the bicarbonate level can occur in a primary manner with a metabolic disorder, or can be the consequence of a variation in PCO2, such as occurs in respiratory disorders. Then, the altered bicarbonate value alone suggests that a patient has an acid-base imbalance, but it is unclear whether the disorder is metabolic or respiratory. Conversely, normal bicarbonate alone does not exclude the presence of a metabolic acid-base imbalance, which could result from the simultaneous presence of acidosis and alkalosis.

The introduction of the standardized base excess, which is used less and less frequently, does not help to clarify this question, because it does not solve the problem of the dependence of bicarbonate on PCO2, and the use of anion gap is most useful to determine the cause of metabolic acidosis (hyperchloremic rather than normochloremic) once it has been diagnosed.

Certainly, in patients with respiratory failure, respiratory acidosis is the most common acid-base disorder, but metabolic alkalosis and/or acidosis are also frequently observed, and their diagnosis is difficult when a respiratory acidosis coexists.

Respiratory acidosis is characterized by increased PCO2 and bicarbonate levels. However, the increase in bicarbonate value is greater in the chronic phase than in the acute phase, because renal adaptive changes lead to a raised urinary re-absorption. In the acute phase, the bicarbonate value increases about 1 mEq for every PCO2 increase of 10 mm Hg, whereas in the chronic phase the increase is about 3–4 mEq for every PCO2 increase of 10 mm Hg. This is the rule of “compensation expected.” Consequently, it is important not only to determine if the bicarbonate value is altered, but also the extent of that alteration in relation to changes in arterial pH and PCO2.

Surprisingly, in the study by Guérin et al, the mean bicarbonate value was significantly higher in group 3 (unstable patients) than in group 1 (stable patients) (see their Table 4). Excluding an incorrect selection of patients, this finding suggests the presence of a concomitant metabolic alkalosis in many of these patients, whereas the normal bicarbonate in groups 2 and 4 does not exclude the presence of a metabolic disorder. It is therefore not acceptable to reduce the traditional approach to the evaluation only of bicarbonate, standardized base excess, and corrected anion gap.

A stepwise approach has been developed6–8 to highlight the presence of a mixed acid-base disorder in the traditional method. Substantial departure from the “compensation expected” suggests a mixed disorder that can be reasonably identified on the basis of discordant variation in PCO2 and bicarbonate, adequacy of compensatory response, and the delta ratio (ie, the ratio of delta corrected anion gap to delta bicarbonate), as well as anamnesis and physical examination.

Thus, to correctly diagnose a mixed disorder in a patient with respiratory failure according to the traditional approach, all these parameters must be reviewed, and the diagnosis can be made only after assessing them overall. Guérin and colleagues did not provide detailed data on each patient and did not report them to be examined, so I think their conclusion of better performance with the Stewart method is not justified. The traditional approach, with only minor adjustments, can provide the same practical information.

Footnotes

  • The author has disclosed no conflicts of interest.

  • Copyright © 2011 by Daedalus Enterprises Inc.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Guérin C,
    2. Nesme P,
    3. Leray V,
    4. Wallet F,
    5. Bourdin G,
    6. Bayle F,
    7. Germain M,
    8. Richard JC
    . Quantitative analysis of acid-base disorders in patients with chronic respiratory failure in stable or unstable respiratory condition. Respir Care 2010;55(11):1453–1463.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Moviat M,
    2. van Haren F,
    3. van der Hoeven H
    . Conventional or physicochemical approach in intensive care unit patients with metabolic acidosis. Critical Care 2003;7(3):R41–R45.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.
    1. Sirker AA,
    2. Rhodes A,
    3. Grounds RM,
    4. Bennett ED
    . Acid-base physiology: the traditional and the modern approaches. Anaesthesia 2002;57(4):348–356.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.
    1. Kurtz I,
    2. Kraut J,
    3. Ornekian V,
    4. Nguyen MK
    . Acid-base analysis: a critique of the Stewart and bicarbonate-centered approaches. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2008;294(5):F1009–F1031.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Rastegar A
    . Clinical utility of Stewart's method in diagnosis and management of acid-base disorders. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009;4(7):1267–1274.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. DuBose TD Jr.
    . Clinical approach to patients with acid-base disorders. Med Clin North Am 1983;67(4):799–813.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.
    1. Fall PJ
    . A stepwise approach to acid-base disorders: practical patient evaluation for metabolic acidosis and other conditions. Postgrad Med 2000;107(3):249–250,253–4,257–8 passim.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Sood P,
    2. Paul G,
    3. Puri S
    . Interpretation of arterial blood gas. Indian J Crit Care Med 2010;14(2):57–64.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 56 (3)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 56, Issue 3
1 Mar 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author

 

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Analysis of Acid-Base Disorders in Patients With Chronic Respiratory Failure
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Analysis of Acid-Base Disorders in Patients With Chronic Respiratory Failure
Cosimo Marcello Bruno
Respiratory Care Mar 2011, 56 (3) 366; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.01201

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Analysis of Acid-Base Disorders in Patients With Chronic Respiratory Failure
Cosimo Marcello Bruno
Respiratory Care Mar 2011, 56 (3) 366; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.01201
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire