Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2021
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2022 Call for Abstracts
    • 2021 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2021
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2022 Call for Abstracts
    • 2021 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
EditorialEditorials

How Much PEEP? Do We Need Another Meta-Analysis?

Dean R Hess
Respiratory Care May 2011, 56 (5) 710-713; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.01315
Dean R Hess
Respiratory Care Services Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2000;342(18):1301–1308.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Ramnath VR,
    2. Hess DR,
    3. Thompson BT
    . Conventional mechanical ventilation in acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Clin Chest Med 2006;27(4):601–613.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Amato MB,
    2. Barbas CS,
    3. Medeiros DM,
    4. Magaldi RB,
    5. Schettino GP,
    6. Lorenzi-Filho G,
    7. et al
    . Effect of a protective-ventilation strategy on mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 1998;338(6):347–354.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Brower RG,
    2. Lanken PN,
    3. MacIntyre N,
    4. Matthay MA,
    5. Morris A,
    6. Ancukiewicz M,
    7. et al
    . Higher versus lower positive end-expiratory pressures in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2004;351(4):327–336.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.
    1. Meade MO,
    2. Cook DJ,
    3. Guyatt GH,
    4. Slutsky AS,
    5. Arabi YM,
    6. Cooper DJ,
    7. et al
    . Ventilation strategy using low tidal volumes, recruitment maneuvers, and high positive end-expiratory pressure for acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2008;299(6):637–645.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Mercat A,
    2. Richard JC,
    3. Vielle B,
    4. Jaber S,
    5. Osman D,
    6. Diehl JL,
    7. et al
    . Positive end-expiratory pressure setting in adults with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2008;299(6):646–655.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Villar J,
    2. Kacmarek RM,
    3. Perez-Mendez L,
    4. Aguirre-Jaime A
    . A high positive end-expiratory pressure, low tidal volume ventilatory strategy improves outcome in persistent acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized, controlled trial. Crit Care Med 2006;34(5):1311–1318.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Talmor D,
    2. Sarge T,
    3. Malhotra A,
    4. O'Donnell CR,
    5. Ritz R,
    6. Lisbon A,
    7. et al
    . Mechanical ventilation guided by esophageal pressure in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med 2008;359(20):2095–2104.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Dasenbrook EC,
    2. Needham DM,
    3. Brower RG,
    4. Fan E
    . Higher PEEP in patients with acute lung injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Respir Care 2011;56(5):568–575.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Briel M,
    2. Meade M,
    3. Mercat A,
    4. Brower RG,
    5. Talmor D,
    6. Walter SD,
    7. et al
    . Higher vs lower positive end-expiratory pressure in patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2010;303(9):865–873.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.
    1. Oba Y,
    2. Thameem DM,
    3. Zaza T
    . High levels of PEEP may improve survival in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis. Respir Med 2009;103(8):1174–1181.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. 12.
    1. Phoenix SI,
    2. Paravastu S,
    3. Columb M,
    4. Vincent JL,
    5. Nirmalan M
    . Does a higher positive end expiratory pressure decrease mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesthesiology 2009;110(5):1098–1105.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Putensen C,
    2. Theuerkauf N,
    3. Zinserling J,
    4. Wrigge H,
    5. Pelosi P
    . Meta-analysis: ventilation strategies and outcomes of the acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute lung injury. Ann Intern Med 2009;151(8):566–576.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Caironi P,
    2. Cressoni M,
    3. Chiumello D,
    4. Ranieri M,
    5. Quintel M,
    6. Russo SG,
    7. et al
    . Lung opening and closing during ventilation of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010;181(6):578–586.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Gattinoni L,
    2. Caironi P,
    3. Cressoni M,
    4. Chiumello D,
    5. Ranieri VM,
    6. Quintel M,
    7. et al
    . Lung recruitment in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2006;354(17):1775–1786.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Gattinoni L,
    2. Pelosi P,
    3. Suter PM,
    4. Pedoto A,
    5. Vercesi P,
    6. Lissoni A
    . Acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by pulmonary and extrapulmonary disease. Different syndromes? Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;158(1):3–11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.
    1. Suter PM,
    2. Fairley B,
    3. Isenberg MD
    . Optimum end-expiratory airway pressure in patients with acute pulmonary failure. N Engl J Med 1975;292(6):284–289.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.
    1. Grasso S,
    2. Stripoli T,
    3. De Michele M,
    4. Bruno F,
    5. Moschetta M,
    6. Angelelli G,
    7. et al
    . ARDSnet ventilatory protocol and alveolar hyperinflation: role of positive end-expiratory pressure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007;176(8):761–767.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    1. Piraino T,
    2. Cook DJ
    . Optimal PEEP guided by esophageal balloon manometry. Respir Care 2011;56(4):510–513.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Grooms DA,
    2. Sibole SH,
    3. Tomlinson JR,
    4. Marik PE,
    5. Chatburn RL
    . Customization of an open-lung ventilation strategy to treat a case of life-threatening acute respiratory distress syndrome. Respir Care 2011;56(4):514–519.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Girgis K,
    2. Hamed H,
    3. Khater Y,
    4. Kacmarek RM
    . A decremental PEEP trial identifies the PEEP level that maintains oxygenation after lung recruitment. Respir Care 2006;51(10):1132–1139.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    1. Hickling KG
    . Best compliance during a decremental, but not incremental, positive end-expiratory pressure trial is related to open-lung positive end-expiratory pressure: a mathematical model of acute respiratory distress syndrome lungs. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;163(1):69–78.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    1. Huh JW,
    2. Jung H,
    3. Vhoi HS,
    4. Hong S,
    5. Lim C,
    6. Koh Y
    . Efficacy of positive end-expiratory pressure titration after the alveolar recruitment manoeuvre in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Critical Care 2009, 13:R22.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 56 (5)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 56, Issue 5
1 May 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author

 

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
How Much PEEP? Do We Need Another Meta-Analysis?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
How Much PEEP? Do We Need Another Meta-Analysis?
Dean R Hess
Respiratory Care May 2011, 56 (5) 710-713; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.01315

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
How Much PEEP? Do We Need Another Meta-Analysis?
Dean R Hess
Respiratory Care May 2011, 56 (5) 710-713; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.01315
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Reprints/Permissions

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire