Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2021
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2022 Call for Abstracts
    • 2021 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2021
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2022 Call for Abstracts
    • 2021 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
EditorialEditorials

Is It Asthma, COPD, or Something In Between, and Does it Matter?

Donald P Tashkin
Respiratory Care August 2012, 57 (8) 1354-1356; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.01970
Donald P Tashkin
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California–Los Angeles Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Asthma and COPD are the most common obstructive pulmonary diseases of adults. Although differences exist in the genetics, pathogenesis, histopathology, cellular characteristics, and clinical features of these 2 diseases, both disorders are heterogeneous and share a number of features that may be more or less characteristic of one than the other. Because of these overlapping features, as many as 25–50% of older adults have been diagnosed with both of these obstructive disorders.1 Using data from the National Health and Nutrition Epidemiologic Survey III (NHANES III), Soriano et al reported that 30.2% of survey participants with a self-reported physician's diagnosis of chronic bronchitis and/or emphysema had also been informed by their physician that they had asthma as well.2

This degree of overlap reflects the frequent difficulty in clinically distinguishing between the 2 diseases. Since no one clinical feature is absolutely discriminatory, and since no validated biomarker has yet been identified that allows one definitively to differentiate asthma from COPD, the diagnosis is dependent on a consideration of several features that may be more characteristic of one than the other disorder. A couple of exceptions include the fact that a defining feature of COPD is “not fully reversible air-flow obstruction,”3 so that fully reversible air-flow obstruction (namely, a ratio of FEV1 to FVC < 70% or less than the lower limit of normal that improves into the normal range in response to a bronchodilator) points to asthma and not COPD, although asthma itself is sometimes not fully reversible. Another exception is very young age, since asthma is usually diagnosed in childhood, whereas COPD is rarely diagnosed under the age of 30 years, with the possible exception of emphysema due to alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. On the other hand, asthma may present for the first time in older age, and not infrequently recurs in adulthood after having apparently gone into remission earlier in life.

Several other clinical features may help clinicians distinguish between the 2 diseases, although considerable overlap exists. The vast majority of patients with COPD are current or former smokers, but some COPD patients have never smoked,3 while some asthmatics have a smoking history. Patients with asthma often have a family history of asthma, although familial clustering may also be present with COPD, reflecting the importance of genetic factors in both diseases. While the vast majority of asthma has an allergic basis,4 some COPD patients also have atopy, a condition that is not uncommon in the general population. Chronic productive cough is common in COPD, whereas in asthma cough is usually episodic rather than chronic, although chronic cough is more likely to be present in asthmatics who smoke, a condition that has been referred to as “asthmatic bronchitis.” Shortness of breath with exertion is the cardinal symptom of COPD, whereas breathlessness is more variable and episodic in asthma. Nighttime awakenings with dyspnea and/or wheezing are more common in asthma than in COPD, although the latter may also be associated with sleep disturbances. Symptoms of asthma are highly variable in frequency both within and between days, whereas symptoms of COPD are more chronic and persistent; however, the clinical course of COPD is generally punctuated by one or more episodes per year of increased symptoms that are classified as exacerbations.5

COPD is defined as a progressive disease characterized by an excessive rate of decline in lung function with age.3,6 However, the annual rate of decline in lung function in adult asthma has also been shown to exceed that in healthy individuals, even after smoking history is taken into account,7 although the annual rate of loss is generally less in asthma than in COPD. Most but not all asthmatics respond well to inhaled corticosteroids, with the major exceptions of patients with severe asthma8 and asthmatics who smoke, while COPD is generally associated with a comparatively poor response to inhaled corticosteroids, presumably related to oxidative stress.9 The nature of the underlying inflammation differs between asthma and COPD, the former being dominated by T-helper type-2 lymphocytes, eosinophils, and mast cells; and the latter by activated alveolar macrophages, neutrophils, and cytotoxic T lymphocytes. On the other hand, in patients with severe asthma, neutrophils may dominate,8 and, conversely, during an exacerbation, patients with COPD may show elevated eosinophils, as well as neutrophils, in their sputum.10

The feature on which many clinicians mostly rely to distinguish asthma from COPD or, at least, to determine whether COPD is associated with an “asthmatic” component, is the response to a bronchodilator, which is characteristically greater in asthma than COPD. However, as pointed out by Kesten and Rebuck11 and discussed further below, the response to a bronchodilator is neither a sensitive nor specific distinguishing feature. Similarly, while nonspecific airway hyper-responsiveness is a hallmark of asthma, a large percentage of patients with COPD also demonstrate hyper-responsiveness to methacholine in the asthma range.12 Interestingly, while the hyper-responsiveness in asthma is independent of the baseline level of air-flow obstruction,13 the hyper-responsiveness in COPD is directly proportional to the pre-methacholine degree of obstruction,12 suggesting differing mechanisms underlying this phenomenon in the 2 diseases.

It is not generally appreciated that most patients with established COPD respond substantially to a bronchodilator, so bronchodilator responsiveness is not a reliable distinguishing characteristic. The response in asthma follows an inverted U-shaped curve, such that those with normal or minimal air-flow obstruction, who have relatively little room for improvement, show little response, those with mild to moderate obstruction show the greatest response, and those with severe obstruction show less response, presumably because obstruction in the latter is more related to airway wall thickness and variable occlusion of the lumen with mucus than to reversible bronchospasm.14 Indeed, in NHANES III, 30% of patients with a physician diagnosis of asthma did not have a positive response to an inhaled bronchodilator.15 Similarly, in COPD, those with only mild air-flow obstruction, as demonstrated in the Lung Health Study, show relatively little response to a bronchodilator,16 while those with moderate obstruction show the greatest response, and those with severe to very severe obstruction show diminishing responses in terms of FEV1.17 Among nearly 6,000 patients with moderate to very severe COPD participating in a clinical trial, 65% fulfilled American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society criteria for a substantial response to a bronchodilator,17 although the response varies from one day to another.18,19 Interestingly, COPD subjects tend to show a greater volume (FVC) than flow (FEV1) response to a bronchodilator,20 while the reverse is true in asthma. Moreover, in COPD, the volume response to a bronchodilator, unlike the flow response, does not diminish as the severity of air-flow obstruction increases.17,21

The study by Kim et al in this issue of Respiratory Care22 describes the clinical features of a relatively small proportion of patients (∼5%) out of those with diagnosed asthma or COPD who were given a diagnosis of overlapping COPD and asthma (“intermediate type”) by Korean specialists (pulmonologists and allergists). Not unexpectedly, compared to the patients with asthma, those with COPD were older, had a lower body mass index, were more often heavy, long-term smokers, had more severe air-flow obstruction, and made more frequent visits to the emergency department, while those given the diagnosis of the “intermediate type” generally had features in-between the patients with asthma or COPD alone. Interestingly, the proportion of patients responding positively to a bronchodilator and the percent increase in FEV1 in response to a bronchodilator were higher in COPD than in asthma, the response to a bronchodilator being in-between in the intermediate type. However, since a positive response to a bronchodilator was framed in terms of the percentage improvement in FEV1 over baseline (a positive response being defined as ≥ 15% without taking the absolute improvement in FEV1 into account), these results were biased toward showing a greater response in those with more severe air-flow obstruction (namely, those more likely to have COPD or the intermediate type than asthma), due to the influence of the lower denominator on this percentage.

The diagnosis of the “intermediate type” between asthma and COPD by the specialists caring for the patients included in the study of Kim et al was most likely based on a synthesis by these clinicians of various demographic, clinical, and physiological features, as well as the preconceptions of these physicians regarding which of these features might be more characteristic of one or the other disorder, the “intermediate type” being diagnosed in those with the most overlapping characteristics. Querying the individual specialists regarding which factors led them to arrive at one or the other of these diagnoses would have provided a deeper insight into the differential diagnostic process in the “real world.” Moreover, since the authors confined their study to patients seen by allergists or pulmonologists, while a large proportion of patients with asthma and COPD are seen by non-specialists, it is not clear how generalizable their findings are to the primary care setting.

In summary, COPD and asthma coexist to a varying degree for reasons that, while not entirely clear, might include:

  • To some extent, they could share a common pathogenetic basis.

  • Asthma has been shown in prospective population-based studies to be a risk factor for the subsequent development of COPD.23

  • A variable proportion of patients with persistent asthma develop a fixed component of air-flow obstruction due to airway wall remodeling,24 thus fulfilling part of the definition of COPD as a “not fully reversible” obstructive disorder.

  • Asthma and COPD are both relatively common disorders that could overlap by chance.

Since both conditions have overlapping features and no validated biomarker exists that can lead to a definitive diagnosis, physicians must rely on an assessment of a variety of clinical features to arrive at a diagnosis. Given this diagnostic challenge, it is not surprising that some patients with features common to both disorders will be diagnosed with an intermediate type. The importance of distinguishing between asthma and COPD and identifying an intermediate type is that treatment approaches as well as prognosis may differ.

Footnotes

  • Correspondence: Donald P Tashkin MD, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California - Los Angeles, 10833 Le Conte Avenue, Los Angeles CA 90095. E-mail: dtashkin{at}mednet.ucla.edu.
  • The author has disclosed no conflicts of interest.

  • See the Original Study on Page 1248

  • Copyright © 2012 by Daedalus Enterprises Inc.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Guerra S
    . Overlap of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2004;11(1):7-13.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Soriano JB,
    2. Davis KJ,
    3. Coleman B,
    4. Visick G,
    5. Mannino D,
    6. Pride NB
    . The proportional Venn diagram of obstructive lung disease. Two approximations from the United States and the United Kingdom. Chest 2003;124(2):474-481.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). Global strategy for the diagnosis, management and prevention of COPD. Updated December 2011. http://www.goldcopd.org/uploads/users/files/GOLD_Report_2011_Feb21.pdf. Accessed May 23, 2012.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Burrows B,
    2. Martinez FD,
    3. Halonen M,
    4. Barbee RA,
    5. Cline MG
    . Association of asthma with serum IgE levels and skin-test reactivity to allergens. N Engl J Med 1989;320(5):272-277.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Hurst JR,
    2. Vestbo J,
    3. Anzueto A,
    4. Locantore N,
    5. Mullerova H,
    6. Tal-Singer R,
    7. et al
    ; Evaluation of COPD Longitudinally to Identify Predictive Surrogate Endpoints (ECLIPSE) investigators. Susceptibility to exacerbation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 2010;363(12):1128-1138.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Fletcher C,
    2. Peto R
    . The natural history of chronic airflow obstruction. BMJ 1977;1(6077):1645-1648.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Lange P,
    2. Parner J,
    3. Vestbo J,
    4. Schnohr P,
    5. Jensen G
    . A 15-year follow-up study of ventilatory function in adults with asthma. N Engl J Med 1998;339(17):1194-1200.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Wenzel SE,
    2. Schwartz LB,
    3. Langmack EL,
    4. Halliday JL,
    5. Trudeau JB,
    6. Gibbs RL,
    7. Chu HW
    . Evidence that severe asthma can be divided pathologically into two inflammatory subtypes with distinct physiologic and clinical characteristics. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;160(3):1001-1008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Barnes PJ
    . Glucocorticoids: current and future directions. Br J Pharmacol 2011;163(1):29-43. DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.01199.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Saetta M,
    2. Di Stefano A,
    3. Maestrelli P,
    4. Turato G,
    5. Ruggieri MP,
    6. Roggeri A,
    7. et al
    . Airway eosinophilia in chronic bronchitis during exacerbations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994;150(6 Pt 1):1646-1652.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Kesten S,
    2. Rebuck AS
    . Is the short-term response to inhaled beta-adrenergic agonist sensitive or specific for distinguishing asthma and COPD? Chest 1994;105(4):1042-1045.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Tashkin DP,
    2. Altose MD,
    3. Bleecker ER,
    4. Connett JE,
    5. Kanner RE,
    6. Lee WW,
    7. Wise R
    ; Lung Health Study Research Group. The Lung Health Study: airway responsiveness to inhaled methacholine in smokers with mild to moderate airflow limitation. Am Rev Respir Dis 1992;145(2 Pt 1):301-310.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Yan K,
    2. Salome CM,
    3. Woolcock AJ
    . Prevalence and nature of bronchial hyperresponsiveness in subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am Rev Respir Dis 1985;132(1):25-29.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Jenne JW
    1. Tashkin DP
    : Measurement and significance of the bronchodilator response. In: Jenne JW, editor. Bronchodilators: theory and practice. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1987:535-613.
  15. 15.↵
    1. Mannino DM,
    2. Gagnon RC,
    3. Petty TL,
    4. Lydick E
    . Obstructive lung disease and low lung function in adults in the United States: data from the National Health and Nutrition Survey, 1988-1994. Arch Intern Med 2000;160(11):1683-1689.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Anthonisen NR,
    2. Connett JE,
    3. Kiley JP,
    4. Altose MD,
    5. Bailey WC,
    6. Buist AS,
    7. et al
    ; Lung Health Study Research Group. Effects of smoking intervention and the use of an inhaled anticholinergic bronchodilator on the rate of decline of FEV1. The Lung Health Study. JAMA 1994;272(19):1497-1505.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Tashkin DP,
    2. Celli B,
    3. Decramer M,
    4. Liu D,
    5. Burkhart D,
    6. Cassino C,
    7. Kesten S
    . Bronchodilator responsiveness in patients with COPD. Eur Respir J 2008;31(4):742-750.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Calverley PM,
    2. Burge PS,
    3. Spencer S,
    4. Anderson JA,
    5. Jones PW
    ; Inhaled Steroids in Obstructive Lung Disease in Europe (ISOLDE) Study Investigators. Bronchodilator reversibility testing in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax 2003;58:659-664.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Dorinsky PM,
    2. Reisner C,
    3. Ferguson GT,
    4. Menjoge SS,
    5. Serby CW,
    6. Witek TJ
    . The combination of ipratropium and albuterol optimizes pulmonary function reversibility testing in patients with COPD. Chest 1999;115(4):966-971.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Newton MF,
    2. O'Donnell DE,
    3. Forkert L
    . Response of lung volumes to inhaled salbutamol in a large population of patients with severe hyperinflation. Chest 2002;121(4):1042-1050.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Celli B,
    2. Tashkin DP,
    3. Rennard SI,
    4. McElhattan J,
    5. Martin U
    . Bronchodilator responsiveness and onset of effect with budesonide/formoterol pMDI in patients with COPD. Respir Med 2011;105(8):1176-1188.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Kim TB,
    2. Oh YM,
    3. Chang YS,
    4. Cho YS,
    5. Jang AS,
    6. Cho SH,
    7. et al
    ; COREA and KOLD Study Group. The reality of an intermediate type between asthma and COPD in practice. Respir Care 2012;57(8):1248-1253.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Silva GE,
    2. Sherrill DL,
    3. Guerra S,
    4. Barbee RA
    . Asthma as a risk factor for COPD in a longitudinal study. Chest 2004;126(1):59-65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Vonk JM,
    2. Jongepier H,
    3. Panhuysen CI,
    4. Schouten JP,
    5. Bleecker ER,
    6. Postma DS
    . Risk factors associated with the presence of irreversible airflow limitation and reduced transfer coefficient in patients with asthma after 26 years of follow up. Thorax 2003;58(4):322-327.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 57 (8)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 57, Issue 8
1 Aug 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Monthly Podcasts

 

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Is It Asthma, COPD, or Something In Between, and Does it Matter?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Is It Asthma, COPD, or Something In Between, and Does it Matter?
Donald P Tashkin
Respiratory Care Aug 2012, 57 (8) 1354-1356; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.01970

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Is It Asthma, COPD, or Something In Between, and Does it Matter?
Donald P Tashkin
Respiratory Care Aug 2012, 57 (8) 1354-1356; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.01970
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Reprints/Permissions

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire