Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Call for Abstracts
    • 2022 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Call for Abstracts
    • 2022 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
LetterLetters

Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation for Prevention of Post-Extubation Respiratory FailureThe authors reply

Antonio M Esquinas Rodriguez, Chin-Pyng Wu, Nicolino Ambrosino, Egbert Pravinkumar, Chien-Ling Su, Ling-Ling Chiang and Yuh-Chin T Huang
Respiratory Care August 2012, 57 (8) 1357; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.01969
Antonio M Esquinas Rodriguez
Intensive Care Unit Hospital Morales Meseguer Murcia, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chin-Pyng Wu
Department of Thoracic Internal Medicine Landseed Hospital Ping-Jen City, Taiwan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicolino Ambrosino
Pulmonary and Respiratory Intensive Care Unit Cardio-Thoracic Department University Hospital Pisa Pisa, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Egbert Pravinkumar
Department of Critical Care MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chien-Ling Su
School of Respiratory Therapy Taipei Medical University Taipei, Taiwan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ling-Ling Chiang
School of Respiratory Therapy Taipei Medical University Taipei, Taiwan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuh-Chin T Huang
Department of Medicine Duke University Medical Center Durham, North Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

In their prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial, Su et al report that noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) used in all patients after extubation did not reduce re-intubation rate, when compared to standard oxygen therapy.1 Nevertheless, we believe that the concept of “preventive” NIV requires not only early application of NIV but also careful selection of patients who are high risk for extubation failure and needing re-intubation.

Some aspects of this study need mention, as these could have influenced the results:

  • Selection of the study patients was based only on few validated risk factors,2 like severely hypercapnic COPD,2,3 high Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, and persistent weaning failure.3

  • The duration of invasive mechanical ventilation prior to extubation is unknown.4

  • In the post-extubation period there was no information on short-term outcome and re-intubation related complications like ventilator-associated pneumonia.4

Early NIV discontinuation could have reduced stability in patients with muscular fatigue, such as in COPD.2,3 Additionally, airway clearance is not taken into account in patients with bronchial hypersecretion, which is a known risk factor for post-extubation respiratory failure.5

To study the use of NIV as a preventive approach in patients at low risk for post-extubation respiratory failure may be futile, and studies should be targeted to high-risk patients.

Footnotes

  • The authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

  • Copyright © 2012 by Daedalus Enterprises Inc.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Su CL,
    2. Chiang LL,
    3. Yang SH,
    4. Lin HI,
    5. Cheng KC,
    6. Huang YC,
    7. Wu CP
    . Preventive use of noninvasive ventilation after extubation: a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled trial. Respir Care 2012;57(2):204-210.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Nava S,
    2. Gregoretti C,
    3. Fanfulla F,
    4. Squadrone E,
    5. Grassi M,
    6. Carlucci A,
    7. et al
    . Noninvasive ventilation to prevent respiratory failure after extubation in high-risk patients. Crit Care Med 2005;33(11):2465-2470.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Ferrer M,
    2. Esquinas A,
    3. Arancibia F,
    4. Bauer TT,
    5. Gonzalez G,
    6. Carrillo A,
    7. et al
    . Noninvasive ventilation during persistent weaning failure: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;168(1):70-76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Thille AW,
    2. Harrois A,
    3. Schortgen F,
    4. Brun-Buisson C,
    5. Brochard L
    . Outcomes of extubation failure in medical intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med 2011;39(12):2612-2618.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Goncalves MR,
    2. Honrado T,
    3. Winck JC,
    4. Paiva JA
    . Effects of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation in preventing respiratory failure after extubation: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care 2012;16(2):R48.
    OpenUrlPubMed

The authors reply

We appreciate the interest of Dr Rodriguez and colleagues in our study.1 We agree that for “preventive” NIV to be most effective, selection of appropriate patients (eg, those who are at high risk for extubation failure) would be important. In fact, in the discussion we cautioned the readers about generalizing our findings to all patients by emphasizing the enrollment of a mixed population in our study. The durations of mechanical ventilation before enrollment into the study were 7.2 ± 4.7 days for the NIV group and 6.7 ± 4.3 days for the control group. These were similar to those in the studies of Ferrer et al.2,3 The primary end points for our study were the re-intubation rate and ICU mortality. We did not follow the complications of patients who required re-intubation, such as ventilator-associated pneumonia. Patients in the NIV group were monitored for respiratory distress after the first 12 hours. NIV was discontinued if patients were stable or reinstated if patients developed respiratory distress. Therefore we believe our patients in the NIV group were adequately supported by NIV after extubation.

We also agree that bronchial secretions could be a major cause of extubation failure, as shown in our result that approximately 25% of patients who failed extubation were felt to have excessive secretions. Finally, our study was initiated in 2002, at which time there were important questions on how best to use NIV at the juncture of extubation. Since then, several studies have identified high-risk patients who may benefit most from early use of NIV in the post hoc analysis, but few have been validated prospectively.4 In addition, in certain patients who were considered high-risk for extubation failure (eg, those who repeatedly failed spontaneous breathing trials in the study by Ferrer et al2), extubation to NIV was simply impractical in clinical practice. Our study used a protocol closely following extubation practice to address the question of whether or not NIV should be used routinely in all patients after extubation.1 According to this largest trial to date, the answer is emphatically “no.”

Footnotes

  • The authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Su CL,
    2. Chiang LL,
    3. Yang SH,
    4. Lin HI,
    5. Cheng KC,
    6. Huang YC,
    7. Wu CP
    . Preventive use of noninvasive ventilation after extubation: a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled trial. Respir Care 2012;57(2):204–210.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Ferrer M,
    2. Esquinas A,
    3. Arancibia F,
    4. Bauer TT,
    5. Gonzalez G,
    6. Carrillo A,
    7. et al
    . Noninvasive ventilation during persistent weaning failure: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;168(1):70–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Ferrer M,
    2. Valencia M,
    3. Nicolas JM,
    4. Bernadich O,
    5. Badia JR,
    6. Torres A
    . Early noninvasive ventilation averts extubation failure in patients at risk: a randomized trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006;173(2):164–170.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Nava S,
    2. Gregoretti C,
    3. Fanfulla F,
    4. Squadrone E,
    5. Grassi M,
    6. Carlucci A,
    7. et al
    . Noninvasive ventilation to prevent respiratory failure after extubation in high-risk patients. Crit Care Med 2005;33(11):2465–2470.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 57 (8)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 57, Issue 8
1 Aug 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Monthly Podcasts

 

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation for Prevention of Post-Extubation Respiratory FailureThe authors reply
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation for Prevention of Post-Extubation Respiratory FailureThe authors reply
Antonio M Esquinas Rodriguez, Chin-Pyng Wu, Nicolino Ambrosino, Egbert Pravinkumar, Chien-Ling Su, Ling-Ling Chiang, Yuh-Chin T Huang
Respiratory Care Aug 2012, 57 (8) 1357; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.01969

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation for Prevention of Post-Extubation Respiratory FailureThe authors reply
Antonio M Esquinas Rodriguez, Chin-Pyng Wu, Nicolino Ambrosino, Egbert Pravinkumar, Chien-Ling Su, Ling-Ling Chiang, Yuh-Chin T Huang
Respiratory Care Aug 2012, 57 (8) 1357; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.01969
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire