Research ArticleOriginal Research

The Association Between Comorbid Illness, Colonization Status, and Acute Hospitalization in Patients Receiving Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation

Avelino C Verceles, Elizabeth J Lechner, David Halpin and Steven M Scharf
Respiratory Care February 2013, 58 (2) 250-256; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.01677

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long-term acute care (LTAC) hospitals provide specialized care for survivors of critical illness who require prolonged mechanical ventilation. These chronically ill patients often have multiple comorbidities and are colonized with antibiotic-resistant organisms. We investigated the association of comorbidities and colonization status with outcomes in patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation in an LTAC facility. We hypothesized that comorbidity burden and colonization with multiple drug resistant organisms would be associated with worse clinical outcomes.

METHODS: We performed a retrospective, cohort study of 157 mechanically ventilated subjects in an urban LTAC facility admitted from January 2007 to September 2009. Comorbidity burden was documented from pre-admission data using the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Colonization data were obtained from surveillance cultures. Outcomes studied included transfer back to acute care facilities, stay, and ventilator weaning status.

RESULTS: Within 60 days, 58.6% of subjects were transferred back to an acute care facility. The most common reason for transfer was infection/sepsis (37%). The Charlson Comorbidity Index of subjects transferred to acute care, versus those who were not, was 4.9 ± 3.1 versus 3.6 ± 2.7 (P = .01), an odds ratio of 1.1 for each 1-point increase in Charlson Comorbidity Index (95% CI 1.03–1.71, P = .02). Colonization with acinetobacter was associated with higher incidence of transfer (71% vs 51%, P = .01). The odds ratio for transfer to acute care was 1.3 for each additional organism colonizing a subject (95% CI 1.11–1.53, P = .006).

CONCLUSIONS: Higher comorbidity burden and colonization status were associated with increased risk of transfer to acute care. Further investigation is needed to clarify this relationship between comorbidity burden and colonization with change in clinical status.

Introduction

Patients treated in critical care units often require prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV) after recovering from catastrophic critical illness. PMV, defined as ventilator dependence for > 21 days,1 is associated with increased hospital morbidity and mortality.2 A multidisciplinary approach involving specialized care teams, high nurse to patient ratios, protocolized weaning practices, and sedation protocols has been shown to reduce duration of mechanical ventilation, morbidity, and mortality.3–7

Recently, long-term acute care (LTAC) hospitals have emerged to provide specialized care required for patients recovering from sequelae of critical illness such as PMV, severe malnutrition, physical deconditioning, and decubitus wounds.8–10 Chronically critically ill patients, such as those admitted to LTAC hospitals, often have high acuity of illness, multiple comorbidities, long hospitalizations, and frequent readmissions to acute care facilities, which increases their risk of colonization and infection with antibiotic-resistant organisms.11,12 These characteristics are associated with poor long-term outcomes and high mortality rates.13,14

Colonization of hospitalized patients with multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant enterococci, and Acinetobacter baumannii is increasing. Estimated prevalence of MRSA and acinetobacter colonization is estimated to be as high as 30%.13 Chronically ill patients in LTAC hospitals often have high acuity of illness, multiple comorbidities, prolonged hospitalizations, and frequent readmissions to acute care facilities, subjecting them to increased risk of colonization and subsequent infection with MDR organisms.14–17

To date there are few studies predicting adverse outcomes in patients admitted to LTAC facilities.14,18 We performed a retrospective cohort study investigating the association between comorbidities and colonization status with clinical outcomes of patients requiring PMV treated at an LTAC facility. We also examined factors affecting ability to wean from PMV. We hypothesized that comorbidity burden and colonization with MDR organisms would be associated with worse clinical outcomes, specifically transfer to acute care setting and successful weaning from PMV.

QUICK LOOK

Current knowledge

Long-term acute care hospitals provide specialized care for survivors of critical illness requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation. These patients often have multiple comorbidities and are colonized with multiple drug resistant organisms. The relationship of this comorbidity burden and multiple drug resistant colonization on outcomes has not been established.

What this paper contributes to our knowledge

When accounted for cumulatively, the total comorbidity burden, as represented by the Charlson Comorbidity Index and acinetobacter colonization, is independently associated with a higher likelihood of readmission to an acute care facility.

Methods

This study was approved by the University of Maryland School of Medicine institutional review board.

Study Design and Subject Selection

We performed a retrospective cohort study of mechanically ventilated in-patients at the University Specialty Hospital, an urban, long-term acute care (LTAC) facility affiliated with the University of Maryland Medical Center. University Specialty Hospital is a 180 bed, LTAC hospital operated by the University of Maryland Medical System. The Ventilator Unit has 60 beds and a patient-nurse ratio of 6.5:1, a respiratory therapist-patient ratio of 9:1, 24-hour hospitalist coverage, hemodialysis unit, and multidisciplinary support team consisting of physical, occupational, recreational, and speech therapists, and clinical pharmacist services, social worker, psychiatric liaisons, and nutritionists. Physical rehabilitation efforts consisted of passive range of motion exercises for ventilator dependent patients. Criteria for transfer from acute care hospitals to the ventilator unit included hemodynamic stability, tracheostomy, FIO2 ≤ 60% with SpO2 ≥ 90%, PEEP ≤ 10 cm H2O, and no need for cardiac monitoring, intravenous vasoactive medications, or continuous intravenous drips.

All subjects included in this study were ventilator-dependent with a tracheostomy (Shiley, Nellcor Puritan Bennett, Pleasanton, California). The subjects studied were identified from a ventilator weaning database kept for quality improvement purposes, admitted between January 2007 and September 2009. To eliminate possible violation of the assumption of independence of observations, subjects who were discharged to an acute care facility or another location and subsequently readmitted to University Specialty Hospital were excluded from the study upon readmission.

Data Collection

Data were extracted from electronic medical records, including demographic data, presence of indwelling lines (central venous catheters, Foley catheters), enteric access tubes, and colonization with MDR organisms. All comorbid illnesses were recorded per subject, and comorbidity burden was characterized from pre-LTAC admission data using the Charlson Comorbidity Index with the Deyo modification.19,20 The Charlson Comorbidity Index is a weighted scoring system that estimates 1-year mortality based on prior comorbid conditions, using the Internal Classification of Diseases (Ninth Revision) codes, with greater values representing greater comorbidity burden. Colonization data were obtained from routine rectal, nasal, and sputum surveillance cultures, collected from each subject on admission to the facility, and when clinically warranted (ie, fever, change in sputum consistency/color, change in oxygen requirements, suspected infection, or hemodynamic instability). Colonization data of interest included cultures found positive either on admission or during the LTAC stay, with MRSA MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa, extended spectrum β lactamase producing Klebsiella pneumoniae, and MDR Acinetobacter baumannii.

Clinical outcomes of interest included transfer to an acute care facility, colonization burden at 60 days, incidence of nosocomial infection, stay at the LTAC hospital, and ventilator weaning status (defined below). We had intended to include mortality at the LTAC hospital as an end point. However, overall mortality in the LTAC facility was very low (1.9%), primarily because subjects were transferred to the acute care hospital when they clinically deteriorated. Thus, mortality could not be analyzed in this study. Colonization was defined as a positive surveillance culture reflecting the presence of microorganisms (on skin, mucous membranes, open wounds, or in excretions or secretions) not causing adverse clinical signs or symptoms.21 Nosocomial infection was defined as positive culture, with evidence of immunologic response from the infected organ (ie, pyuria in a urinary tract infection, increased number of polymorphonuclear leukocytes on sputum culture, or bacteria in body fluids that are presumed sterile) acquired > 48 hours after the subject's hospitalization to the LTAC facility, which required therapy with antibiotics.21 These were categorized as bacteremia, urinary tract infection, pneumonia, soft tissue, and other if they did not fit into any of the other categories. Sepsis was defined according to consensus criteria as having 2 of 4 systemic inflammatory response criteria and evidence of infection, suspected or confirmed.22

The definition of successful weaning from PMV according to the National Association for Medical Direction of Respiratory Care guidelines is the ability to tolerate tracheostomy collar for 48 hours without mechanical ventilator support, or 7 days requiring only nocturnal ventilation for 8 or fewer hours.1 Weaning status was recorded as “weaned” or “not weaned” according to this definition. “Weaned” refers to subjects who were no longer ventilator dependent, as defined by the above National Association for Medical Direction of Respiratory Care guidelines during their stay in the LTAC.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using statistics software (GB Stat 9.0, GB Stat, Silver Spring, Maryland). Descriptive estimates of demographic and clinical characteristics are reported as mean and standard deviation and interquartile values. Frequency of distribution with percentages was calculated for categorical demographic data.

Logistic regression was performed to determine odds ratios to describe relationships between continuous variables over time. Comparisons of proportions (chi-square) were conducted when analyzing categorical variables, and comparisons of means were performed using the Student t test when appropriate.

Results

One hundred fifty-seven subject records were reviewed. Subject characteristics are shown in Table 1. The median age of our cohort was 60 years (range 22–97 y), 58.6% were African American, and 36.9% were white. Hypertension (63.1%), diabetes mellitus (43.3%), and cerebrovascular accident (29.9%) were the most frequent comorbidities in our cohort. Most subjects (63.7%) were admitted from a medical ICU, with smaller percentages of subjects admitted from trauma (7.0%) and surgical (4.5%) ICUs. There were one or more central venous catheters in 45.9% of the subjects.

View this table:
Table 1.

Subject Characteristics

Mean stay was 34.2 days (Table 2). Within 60 days 58.6% of subjects were transferred to an acute care facility. Organ system failures resulting in transfer are listed in Table 3, with the most common being suspected infection or sepsis (37%). Other reasons for transfer to an acute care facility included respiratory (tachypnea and/or oxygen desaturation), gastrointestinal (gastrointestinal bleed or surgical issues), cardiac (extreme tachycardia or decompensated heart failure), and neurologic (change in mental status) etiologies. Successful weaning occurred in 56.7% of the subjects.

View this table:
Table 2.

Outcomes of LTAC Cohort

View this table:
Table 3.

Reasons for Transfer to Acute Care Facility

The overall mean Charlson Comorbidity Index of our cohort was 4.3. The Charlson Comorbidity Index of subjects who were transferred to an acute care facility was 4.9 ± 3.1, compared to 3.6 ± 2.7 for those who were not (P = .01). An odds ratio of 1.1 for transfer to an acute care facility was calculated for each increase of one point in Charlson Comorbidity Index (95% CI 1.03–1.71, P = .02). No statistically significant associations between any individual comorbidity and outcomes were found.

The characteristics of subjects requiring transfer to acute care facilities are shown in Table 4. Of subjects colonized with acinetobacter in the sputum, 71.0% were transferred to acute care facilities, compared with 50.5% of subjects who were not colonized (P = .01). Mean stay in the LTAC was 30 days in subjects colonized with acinetobacter, compared to 37 days in subjects who were not colonized (P = .06). Colonization at any other site tested with MRSA, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, pseudomonas, and klebsiella did not have any statistically significant associations with transfer to acute care hospitals.

View this table:
Table 4.

Characteristics of Subjects Transferred to Acute Care Hospitals, Compared With Those Who Were Not Transferred

The odds ratio for transfer to acute care was 1.3 (95% CI 1.11–1.53, P = .006) for each additional organism colonizing a subject. Comparison of proportions using the chi-square test showed that all subjects who increased their overall colonization burden by 3 organisms in 60 days were transferred to acute care (P < .001).

In addition, we performed multiple logistic regression for determining predictors of transfer to an acute care facility. Included in the model were the only 2 variables predicting transfer in bivariate analysis: the age adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, and the presence of acinetobacter colonization at some point during the LTAC stay. Analysis showed that both variables were significant independent predictors of transfer to acute care facility (P = .003 for the overall prediction model). The odds ratios were as follows: for Charlson Comorbidity Index 1.154 for each 1 unit increase in Charlson Comorbidity Index (CI 1.027–1.295, P = .02), for the presence of acinetobacter 2.444 (CI 1.407–4.248, P = .01).

We determined whether the development of acinetobacter during the LTAC stay was a predictor of transfer to the acute care facility. Subjects were divided into 3 groups according to acinetobacter colonization status: those with initial cultures positive; those initially negative who remained negative during subsequent cultures (when subsequent cultures were drawn); and those initially negative who became positive during subsequent cultures (Table 5). Development of positive cultures for acinetobacter at any time was strongly associated with transfer to the acute care facility (P = .002).

View this table:
Table 5.

Transfer to Acute Care Facility by Development of Acinetobacter Colonization

Logistic regression analysis of age and ventilator weaning showed that the odds of successful weaning for every 5-year increase in age was 0.8 (95% CI 0.71–0.89, P < .001). There were no statistically significant associations between race, sex, or Charlson Comorbidity Index and ventilator weaning.

Discussion

Our study demonstrates that subjects with PMV from an LTAC hospital who had a higher total comorbidity burden, as represented by the Charlson Comorbidity Index, were more likely to require transfer to an acute care facility. Additionally, subjects who were colonized with multiple organisms were also more likely to be transferred, with acinetobacter being an organism that was independently associated with transfer. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the associations between comorbidities and bacterial colonization status with transfer to acute care facility in chronically ventilated LTAC patients.

Charlson Comorbidity Index was initially tested in a longitudinal study of general hospitalized patients, and subsequently validated in oncology.23 It has more recently been validated in studies involving patients with antibiotic-resistant organisms.24 Other scoring systems, such as the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II), and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), have been widely used as a measure of severity of illness and to predict outcomes in critically ill patients,25–27 but may not be applicable in determining severity of illness in LTAC patients. We used the Charlson Comorbidity Index to measure severity of illness of our patient population because of its ease of calculation and its suitability in our population, as a less acutely ill cohort. To our knowledge, ours is the first study that demonstrates the prognostic utility of Charlson Comorbidity Index in chronically ill patients requiring PMV. Although we had intended to include mortality as an outcome in our study, the low occurrence of death at the LTAC precluded this analysis.

The results of our study suggest that Charlson Comorbidity Index can be used to predict transfer as an adverse outcome in chronically critically ill patients. Although an increased number of comorbidities represented by the Charlson Comorbidity Index was associated with increased odds of transfer to an acute care facility, when individual comorbidities were examined for association with transfer, no statistically significant associations were found. This suggests that the total comorbidity burden (or cumulative number of comorbid illnesses experienced by an individual) may have a stronger relationship with worse outcomes than any one comorbid illness alone. Our findings demonstrate that, by considering a patient's comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index), it is possible to predict the need for acute care. Other scoring systems used in ICUs do not account for comorbid conditions, which may make them less useful in chronically ill patients who have multiple comorbidities. Therefore, as the number of these patients increases and research interest grows in this area, the Charlson Comorbidity Index may prove to be a simple and accurate instrument to classify the severity of illness and to predict transfer of chronically ventilated patients.

A second important finding in our study was the relationship demonstrated between increased colonization burden and transfer to acute care hospitals. Subjects who were colonized with multiple MDR organisms had a significantly greater rate of transfer to acute care facility for medical decompensation, with the most common cause being infectious/septic in origin. All subjects who increased their colonization burden by 3 organisms in 60 days were transferred to acute care hospitals. One may infer that this association is based on the higher incidence of infection in subjects colonized with multiple organisms. This association between colonization and infection has been shown in studies with MRSA.14

Only colonization with MDR acinetobacter was significantly associated with transfer to an acute care facility. This may suggest that colonization with MDR acinetobacter is a marker of more severe illness, or perhaps patient frailty, requiring management in an acute care setting. Additionally, our finding that those who developed cultures positive for acinetobacter during their LTAC facility admission had a high incidence of transfer to an acute care facility is consistent with other work that has demonstrated poor outcomes in patients colonized with MDR organisms.14,15,28

Subjects colonized with acinetobacter were also found to have shorter stay in the LTAC hospital, presumably because they developed a deterioration of clinical status requiring transfer to acute care earlier than subjects not colonized with this organism. Although there is some subjectivity to clinical judgment, specifically the severity of patient illness or acuity that would prompt a transfer to higher level of care, the hospitalists at our LTAC uniformly practiced transfer upon recognition of severe sepsis, as defined by accepted guidelines, thus providing some clinical consistency to the reasoning behind urgent or emergency acute care transfers.

Our study also showed an approximately 20% decreased odds of successful ventilator weaning for every 5-year increase in age. This observation that older patients are more difficult to wean from the ventilator is consistent with previous studies.29–31 Race, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index were not significant predictors of successful ventilator weaning.

Limitations of our study include its retrospective design, as well as the restricted generalizability of our population, which includes only chronically ventilated patients in an LTAC facility. Additionally, since overall colonization was recorded through day 60, regardless of the patient's stay in the LTAC hospital, it is possible that colonization status may have been influenced by the patients' prior stay at the acute care hospital. Patients with higher acuity that required transfer to acute care may have been more susceptible to colonization with MDR organisms. One final limitation of this study when using the Charlson Comorbidity Index to estimate severity of illness in this patient population is that, unlike other scoring systems that focus on acute illness, the Charlson Comorbidity Index cannot be quickly calculated by examination. Calculating a Charlson Comorbidity Index requires knowledge of a patient's medical history and comorbidities, which may be troublesome as chronically ill patients on mechanical ventilation are often not able to communicate this information with the physician themselves. Therefore there is strong reliance on prior medical documentation and information from the patient's family members, which may result in an inaccurate calculation of the Charlson Comorbidity Index.

Additionally, the need to transfer patients to an acute care facility from an LTAC hospital may depend on facility capabilities (ie, does the LTAC hospital have an ICU, continuous telemetry monitoring capability, and appropriate staffing and credentialing to manage more acutely ill patients?). Thus, the degree to which the results described can be generalized to all settings will depend on institutional factors such as practice culture, organization, technical capabilities of various hospital units, staffing models, and ease of access to acute care settings.

Conclusions

LTAC facilities provide care for patients requiring PMV with a high comorbidity burden and colonization with multiple MDR organisms. When accounted for cumulatively, total comorbidity burden as represented by Charlson Comorbidity Index and acinetobacter colonization is independently associated with a higher likelihood of transfer to acute care facilities. Thus, further investigation is necessary to elucidate this relationship between comorbidity burden and colonization with change in clinical status.

Footnotes

  • Correspondence: Elizabeth Lechner MD. E-mail: elech001{at}umaryland.edu.

  • The authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

  • See the Related Editorial on Page 383

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. MacIntyre NR,
    2. Epstein SK,
    3. Carson SS,
    4. Scheinhorn D,
    5. Christropher K,
    6. Muldoon S
    ; National Association for Medical Direction of Respiratory Care. Management of patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation: report of a NAMDRC consensus conference. Chest 2005;128(6):3937-3954.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Feng Y,
    2. Amoateng-Adjepong Y,
    3. Kaufman D,
    4. Gheorghe C,
    5. Manthous CA
    . Age, duration of mechanical ventilation, and outcomes of patients who are critically ill. Chest 2009;136(3):759-764.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Kahn JM,
    2. Goss CH,
    3. Heagerty PJ,
    4. Kramer AA,
    5. O'Brien CR,
    6. Rubenfeld GD
    . Hospital volume and the outcomes of mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med 2006;355(1):41-50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.
    1. Young MP,
    2. Gooder VJ,
    3. Oltermann MH,
    4. Bohman CB,
    5. French TK,
    6. James BC
    . The impact of a multidisciplinary approach on caring for ventilator-dependent patients. Int J Qual Health Care 1998;10(1):15-26.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.
    The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2000;342(18):1301-1308.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.
    1. Ely EW,
    2. Baker AM,
    3. Dunagan DP,
    4. Burke HL,
    5. Smith AC,
    6. Kelly PT,
    7. et al
    . Effect on the duration of mechanical ventilation of identifying patients capable of breathing spontaneously. N Engl J Med 1996;335(25):1864-1869.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Brook AD,
    2. Ahrens TS,
    3. Schaiff R,
    4. Prentice D,
    5. Sherman G,
    6. Shannon W,
    7. Kollef MH
    . Effect of a nursing-implemented sedation protocol on the duration of mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med 1999;27(12):2609-2615.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Scheinhorn DJ,
    2. Hassenpflug MS,
    3. Votto JJ,
    4. Chao DC,
    5. Epstein SK,
    6. Doig GS,
    7. et al
    . Ventilator-dependent survivors of catastrophic illness transferred to 23 long-term care hospitals for weaning from prolonged mechanical ventilation. Chest 2007;131(1):76-84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.
    1. Kahn JM,
    2. Benson NM,
    3. Appleby D,
    4. Carson SS,
    5. Iwashyna TJ
    . Long-term acute care hospital utilization after critical illness. JAMA 2010;303(22):2253-2259.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Munoz-Price LS
    . Long-term acute care hospitals. Clin Infect Dis 2009;49(3):438-443.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Stephens C,
    2. Francis SJ,
    3. Abell V,
    4. DiPersio JR,
    5. Wells P
    . Emergence of resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in critically ill patients within an acute care teaching hospital and a long-term acute care hospital. Am J Infect Control 2007;35(4):212-215.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Scheinhorn DJ,
    2. Hassenpflug MS,
    3. Votto JJ,
    4. Chao DC,
    5. Epstein SK,
    6. Doig GS,
    7. et al
    . Post-ICU mechanical ventilation at 23 long-term care hospitals: a multicenter outcomes study. Chest 2007;131(1):85-93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Furuno JP,
    2. Hebden JN,
    3. Standiford HC,
    4. Perencevich EN,
    5. Miller RR,
    6. Moore AC,
    7. et al
    . Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Acinetobacter baumannii in a long-term acute care facility. Am J Infect Control 2008;36(7):468-471.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Safdar N,
    2. Bradley EA
    . The risk of infection after nasal colonization with Staphylococcus aureus. Am J Med 2008;121(4):310-315.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Jung JY,
    2. Park MS,
    3. Kim SE,
    4. Park BH,
    5. Son JY,
    6. Kim EY,
    7. et al
    . Risk factors for multi-drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii bacteremia in patients with colonization in the intensive care unit [abstract]. BMC Infect Dis 2010;10:228.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.
    1. Carson S,
    2. Garrett J,
    3. Hanson LC,
    4. Lanier J,
    5. Govert J,
    6. Brake MC,
    7. et al
    . A prognostic model for one-year mortality in patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med 2008;36(7):2061-2069.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Nasraway SA,
    2. Button GJ,
    3. Rand WM,
    4. Hudson-Jinks T,
    5. Gustafson M
    . Survivors of catastrophic illness: outcome after direct transfer from intensive care to extended care facilities. Crit Care Med 2000;28(1):19-25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Carson SS,
    2. Bach PB,
    3. Brzozowski L,
    4. Leff A
    . Outcomes after long-term acute care: an analysis of 133 mechanically ventilated patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;159(5 Pt 1):1568-1573.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Charlson ME,
    2. Pompei P,
    3. Ales KL,
    4. MacKenzie CR
    . A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40(5):373-383.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Deyo RA,
    2. Cherkin DC,
    3. Ciol MA
    . Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemio 1992;45(6):613-619.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    1. Horan TC,
    2. Andrus M,
    3. Dudeck MA
    . CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control 2008;36(5):309-332. Erratum in: Am J Infect Control 2008;36(9):655.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Bone RC,
    2. Balk RA,
    3. Cerra FB,
    4. Dellinger RP,
    5. Fein AM,
    6. Knaus WA,
    7. et al
    . Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chest 1992;101(6):1644-1655.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. West DW,
    2. Satariano WA,
    3. Ragland DR,
    4. Hiatt RA
    . Comorbidity and breast cancer survival: a comparison between black and white women. Ann Epidemiol 1996;6(5):413-419.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. McGregor JC,
    2. Kim PW,
    3. Perencevich EN,
    4. Bradham DD,
    5. Furuno JP,
    6. Kaye KS,
    7. et al
    . Utility of the chronic disease score and Charlson Comorbidity index as comorbidity measures for use in epidemiologic studies of antibiotic-resistant organisms. Am J Epidemiol 2005;161(5):483-493.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Knaus WA,
    2. Draper EA,
    3. Wagner DP,
    4. Zimmerman JE
    . APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985;13(10):818-829.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.
    1. Le Gall J-R,
    2. Lemeshow S,
    3. Saulnier F
    . A new simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 1993;270(24):2957-2963.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Vincent JL,
    2. Moreno R,
    3. Takala J,
    4. Willatts S,
    5. De Mendonca A,
    6. Bruining H,
    7. et al
    . The SOFA (sepsis-related organ failure assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the working group on sepsis-related problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 1996;22(7):707-710.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Martinez-Pellús A,
    2. Ruiz Gómez J,
    3. Jaime Sánchez F,
    4. Simarro Córdoba E,
    5. Fernández Lozano JA
    . [Incidence of colonization and infection by Acinetobacter baumannii in an endemic setting (ICU). Analysis of risk factors by means of a surveillance study]. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 2002;20(5)194-199. Article in Spanish.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Krieger BP
    . Respiratory failure in the elderly. Clin Geriatr Med 1994;10(1):103-119.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. 30.
    1. Cohen IL,
    2. Lambrinos J
    . Investigating the impact of age on outcome of mechanical ventilation using a population of 41,848 patients from a statewide database. Chest 1995;107(6):1673-1680.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Perren A,
    2. Previsdomini M,
    3. Llamas M,
    4. Cerutti B,
    5. Gyorik S,
    6. Merlani G,
    7. Jolliet P
    . Patients' prediction of extubation success. Intensive Care Med 2010;36(12):2045-2052.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

 

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools

Jump to section

Related Articles

Cited By...

Keywords