Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Open Forum
    • 2023 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Open Forum
    • 2023 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
EditorialEditorials

A Fresh Look at the Physiologic Effects of High-Flow Nasal Cannulae and the Role They Play in Patient Care

Richard B Wettstein
Respiratory Care April 2013, 58 (4) 715-716; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.02388
Richard B Wettstein
Department of Respiratory Care University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, Texas
MMEd RRT
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Treatment strategies to address oxygenation problems in critically ill patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure commonly fall into 3 categories: use of simple oxygen equipment, use of noninvasive ventilation, or use of invasive ventilation. These categories typically represent a stepwise approach to the management of patients with increased levels of oxygen demands.

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), nasal high-flow oxygen therapy, and high-flow therapy are terms used to describe flows of > 6 L/min delivered through nasal cannula. Most often these high flows are delivered through an air/oxygen blender and heated humidifier. What makes this therapy unique is that it not only provides oxygen therapy similar to other simple oxygen equipment, but it also provides a low level of CPAP. This CPAP effect was first noted by Locke et al in 1993,1 and since has been well documented by a number of authors.2–9

The greatest fear clinicians have regarding high-flow therapy is the lack of knowledge of how much pressure is delivered to the airways. Although concern has been raised by some authors6,7 regarding the CPAP pressure in premature infants, particularly those weighing < 1,000 g, similar concerns have not been documented in the adult population. Current evidence has demonstrated that airway pressures do not exceed 4–5 cm H2O at flows as high as 40 L/min.3,4,8,9 My colleagues and I, in an unpublished study of healthy adult volunteers using a HFNC system, also found that roughly 1 cm H2O of CPAP was associated with each 10 L/min increment in flow. The HFNC can then be considered a crossover strategy between basic oxygen equipment and noninvasive CPAP. In addition, it provides expanded capability while potentially maintaining some of the advantages of basic oxygen equipment. These potential advantages include increased patient adherence, increased patient comfort, and relatively low cost, compared to traditional noninvasive CPAP devices, and might free up ICU beds for patients requiring more invasive interventions.

Peters et al investigated the use of HFNC in patients with do-not-intubate status and publish their findings in this issue of Respiratory Care.10 This was a small clinical study that enrolled 50 consecutive patients (25 men and 25 women) who met the inclusion criteria (do-not-intubate, dyspnea, tachypnea, hypoxemia, PaCO2 ≤ 65 mm Hg, and pH ≥ 7.28). All 50 patients were placed on HFNC; the treatment was successful in maintaining 82% (41) of these patients. The remaining 18% (9) of patients required escalation to noninvasive ventilation. The authors' findings suggest that HFNC may serve as a viable alternative to use of traditional noninvasive CPAP devices in this patient population.

Logically, if a CPAP level is established using HFNC, there should be a corresponding increase in the functional residual capacity (FRC). This was verified in a study by Corley et al, published in the British Journal of Anaesthesia in 2011.11 Also in this issue, Riera and colleagues further expand the growing body of evidence that supports an increase in FRC when using HFNC.12 The authors used electrical impedance tomography to examine changes in lung volume (FRC) associated with the use of HFNC. They found that end-expiratory lung impedance increased with the use of HFNC, suggesting an increase in FRC. In patients with restrictive lung disease this has the potential to reduce the work of breathing by stabilizing alveoli and moving ventilation to a more compliant position on the volume/pressure curve. A study by Saslow et al found improved lung compliance with the use of HFNC in the neonatal population.13 It might be inferred that similar findings will be forthcoming in the adult population, given the documented presence of CPAP and increased FRC.

HFNC is suggested as a viable therapeutic alternative for providing supplemental oxygen to seriously ill and terminal patients suffering from hypoxemia and conditions requiring noninvasive CPAP. Considering the relatively low cost of many HFNC systems, and the potential for increased patient comfort and adherence compared to conventional noninvasive CPAP systems, respiratory therapists need to actively promote wider usage of this treatment modality.

Footnotes

  • Correspondence: Richard Wettstein MMEd RRT, Department of Respiratory Care, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio TX 78229. E-mail: wettstein{at}uthscsa.edu.
  • The author has disclosed no conflicts of interest.

  • See the Original Studies on Pages 589 and 597

  • Copyright © 2013 by Daedalus Enterprises

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Locke RG,
    2. Wolfson MR,
    3. Shaffer TH,
    4. Rubenstein SD,
    5. Greenspan JS
    . Inadvertent administration of positive end-distending pressure during nasal cannula flow. Pediatrics 1993;91(1):135-138.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Chatila W,
    2. Nugent T,
    3. Vance G,
    4. Gaughan J,
    5. Criner GJ
    . The effects of high-flow vs low-flow oxygen on exercise in advanced obstructive airways disease. Chest 2004;126(4):1108-1115.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Williams AB,
    2. Ritchie JE,
    3. Gerard C
    . Evaluation of a high-flow nasal oxygen delivery system: gas analysis and pharyngeal pressures. Intensive Care Med 2006;32(S1):S219.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Groves N,
    2. Tobin A
    . High flow nasal oxygen generates positive airway pressure in adult volunteers. Aust Crit Care 2007;20(4):126-131.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.
    1. Kahn DJ,
    2. Courtney SE,
    3. Steele AM,
    4. Habib RH
    . Unpredictability of delivered bubble nasal continuous positive airway pressure role of bias flow magnitude and nares-prong air leaks. Pediatr Res 2007;62(3):343-347.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Wilkinson DJ,
    2. Andersen CC,
    3. Smith K,
    4. Holberton J
    . Pharyngeal pressure with high-flow nasal cannulae in premature infants. J Perinatol 2008;28(1):42-47.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Kubicka ZJ,
    2. Limauro J,
    3. Darnall RA
    . Heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannula therapy: yet another way to deliver continuous positive airway pressure? Pediatrics 2008;121(1):82-88.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Parke RL,
    2. McGuinness SP,
    3. Eccleston ML
    . Nasal high-flow therapy delivers low level positive airway pressure. Br J Anaesth 2009;103(6):886-890.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Parke RL,
    2. Eccleston ML,
    3. McGuinness SP
    . The effects of flow on airway pressure during nasal high-flow oxygen therapy. Respir Care 2011;56(8):1151-1155.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Peters SG,
    2. Holets SR,
    3. Gay PC
    . High-flow nasal cannula therapy in do-not-intubate patients with hypoxemic respiratory distress. Respir Care 2013;58(4):597-600.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Corley A,
    2. Caruana LR,
    3. Barnett AG,
    4. Tronstad O,
    5. Fraser JF
    . Oxygen delivery through highflow nasal cannulae increase and-expiratory lung volume and reduce respiratory rate in post-cardiac surgical patients. Br J Anaesth 2011;107(6):998-1004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Riera J,
    2. Pérez P,
    3. Cortes J,
    4. Roca O,
    5. Masclans JR,
    6. Rello J
    . Effect of high-flow nasal cannula and body position on end-expiratory lung volume. a cohort study using electrical impedance tomography. Respir Care 2013;58(4):589-596.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Saslow JG,
    2. Aghai ZH,
    3. Nakhla TA,
    4. Hart JJ,
    5. Lawrysh R,
    6. Stahl GE,
    7. Pyon KH
    . Work of breathing using high-flow nasal cannula in preterm infants. J Perinatol 2006;26(8):476-480.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 58 (4)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 58, Issue 4
1 Apr 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Monthly Podcasts

 

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Fresh Look at the Physiologic Effects of High-Flow Nasal Cannulae and the Role They Play in Patient Care
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
A Fresh Look at the Physiologic Effects of High-Flow Nasal Cannulae and the Role They Play in Patient Care
Richard B Wettstein
Respiratory Care Apr 2013, 58 (4) 715-716; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.02388

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
A Fresh Look at the Physiologic Effects of High-Flow Nasal Cannulae and the Role They Play in Patient Care
Richard B Wettstein
Respiratory Care Apr 2013, 58 (4) 715-716; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.02388
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire