High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Conventional Oxygen Therapy After Endotracheal Extubation: A Randomized Crossover Physiologic Study

Nuttapol Rittayamai; Jamsak Tscheikuna; Pitchayapa Rujiwit

doi:10.4187/respcare.02397

Research ArticleOriginal Research

High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Conventional Oxygen Therapy After Endotracheal Extubation: A Randomized Crossover Physiologic Study

Nuttapol Rittayamai, Jamsak Tscheikuna and Pitchayapa Rujiwit

Respiratory Care April 2014, 59 (4) 485-490; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.02397

Nuttapol Rittayamai

Division of Respiratory Diseases and Tuberculosis, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Find this author on Google Scholar
Find this author on PubMed
Search for this author on this site
For correspondence: [email protected]

Jamsak Tscheikuna

Division of Respiratory Diseases and Tuberculosis, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Find this author on Google Scholar
Find this author on PubMed
Search for this author on this site

Pitchayapa Rujiwit

Division of Pulmonary and Pulmonary Critical Care Disease, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand.

Find this author on Google Scholar
Find this author on PubMed
Search for this author on this site

Article
Figures & Data
Info & Metrics
References
PDF

You are using an old browser, click here to download PDF

PDF Container

PreviousNext

In this issue

Respiratory Care

Vol. 59, Issue 4

1 Apr 2014

Table of Contents
Table of Contents (PDF)
Cover (PDF)
Index by author

Download PDF

Article Alerts

User Name *

Password *

Email *

Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Your Email *

Your Name *

Send To *

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.

You are going to email the following High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Conventional Oxygen Therapy After Endotracheal Extubation: A Randomized Crossover Physiologic Study

Message Subject (Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care

Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.

Your Personal Message

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Citation Tools

High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Conventional Oxygen Therapy After Endotracheal Extubation: A Randomized Crossover Physiologic Study

Nuttapol Rittayamai, Jamsak Tscheikuna, Pitchayapa Rujiwit

Respiratory Care Apr 2014, 59 (4) 485-490; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.02397

Citation Manager Formats

BibTeX
Bookends
EasyBib
EndNote (tagged)
EndNote 8 (xml)
Medlars
Mendeley
Papers
RefWorks Tagged
Ref Manager
RIS
Zotero

High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Conventional Oxygen Therapy After Endotracheal Extubation: A Randomized Crossover Physiologic Study

Nuttapol Rittayamai, Jamsak Tscheikuna, Pitchayapa Rujiwit

Respiratory Care Apr 2014, 59 (4) 485-490; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.02397

Share This Article:

Tweet Widget
Facebook Like
Google Plus One

Jump to section

Article
Figures & Data
Info & Metrics
References
PDF

Cited By...

Keywords

high-flow nasal oxygen cannula
Non-rebreathing mask
endotracheal extubation
oxygen therapy-noninvasive ventilation

Main menu

User menu

Search

High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Conventional Oxygen Therapy After Endotracheal Extubation: A Randomized Crossover Physiologic Study

In this issue

Citation Manager Formats

Related Articles

Cited By...

Keywords

Info For

About Us

AARC

More